sent from a phone
> On 26. Apr 2018, at 21:55, Simon Poole wrote:
>
> It would seem that a simple way to make the tagging in the first case
> less ambivalent would be to add a tag segregated=yes/no (so a unisex=yes
> segregated=yes facility would only have gender specific
Somehow I don't see anything on the wiki page that supports this lengthy
thread.
The issue may be that there are (at least) two ways to map a toilet
facility:
- rough, one node or area for the whole thing, indicating that unisex,
female and male apply to the options available within, making it
> That's one of my original questions. What (if any) data consumers are
using this data/tags?
>
> If some popular site/app was using it to display a map that's one thing.
If no-one is using the data, and many data contributors (mappers) are
using "unisex=yes" as gender neutral, then it doesn't
On 26/04/18 01:00, Nicolás Alvarez wrote:
If most existing data is using unisex to mean "there are both male and
female toilets", then it doesn't matter one bit what the wiki says.
Reusing the tag to mean "there are gender-neutral toilets" will cause
confusion with that existing data.
That's
sent from a phone
> On 26. Apr 2018, at 00:21, Tobias Knerr wrote:
>
> This may be a stupid question, but where are you all getting this
> definition from?
>
> I assumed the key already had the meaning that Rory is suggesting here.
admittedly from Rory who wrote in
What I see most often is a room with toilets for men, another room with
toilets for women and a toilet for people with disabilities, usually a
somewhat higher pot in a relatively big room with a larger door. The last
one is gender neutral, of course. I don't think anyone maps that
explicitly, as
2018-04-25 19:21 GMT-03:00 Tobias Knerr :
> On 25.04.2018 15:23, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>> Unisex=yes is defined as a shortcut for male=yes + female=yes
>
> This may be a stupid question, but where are you all getting this
> definition from?
>
> I assumed the key already
On 25.04.2018 15:23, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> Unisex=yes is defined as a shortcut for male=yes + female=yes
This may be a stupid question, but where are you all getting this
definition from?
I assumed the key already had the meaning that Rory is suggesting here.
And at least on the
sent from a phone
> On 25. Apr 2018, at 09:35, Rory McCann wrote:
>
> My proposal improves the meaning (IMO). A "unisex hairdresser" is like a
> "unisex toilet": all people, regardless of gender, facilitated in the same
> mixed place. Not many unisex hairdressers are
My proposal improves the meaning (IMO). A "unisex hairdresser" is like a
"unisex toilet": all people, regardless of gender, facilitated in the
same mixed place. Not many unisex hairdressers are gender segregated,
with males in one room, and women in another! My proposal is that
"unisex=yes"
FYI The unisex tag is also used as a shorthand for female=yes, male=yes on
shop=hairdresser [1] . Giving it another meaning on toilets might cause
extra confusion.
regards
m
[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:shop=hairdresser
Op di 24 apr. 2018 18:27 schreef Rory McCann
11 matches
Mail list logo