All,
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 3:51 AM, Elena ``of Valhalla''
elena.valha...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2012-03-29 at 11:06:38 +0200, Jochen Topf wrote:
The storage part is not true any more. Bing used OSM data to mask out
military
areas in Germany, so the Bing images are now automatically
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 03:58:46PM -0600, Martijn van Exel wrote:
Does anyone know of applications in the OSM ecosystem that systematically
download large areas' worth of Bing Aerial tiles?
The license[0] implies that this is not allowed because 1) you cannot
'copy, store, archive, or create a
Sorry, but your statement wrt Bing imagery is not true (and very silly).
Just because Bing/MS may have committed a minor breach of CC-by-SA 2.0
terms
doesn't change anything wrt their rights in their products. You may
naturally ask
them to cease distributing such material and could potentially
discuss licensing. :-)
Jochen
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 11:31:41AM +0200, Simon Poole wrote:
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 11:31:41 +0200
From: Simon Poole si...@poole.ch
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Applications systematically consuming Bing Aerial
tiles
Sorry, but your statement
On 2012-03-29 at 11:06:38 +0200, Jochen Topf wrote:
The storage part is not true any more. Bing used OSM data to mask out military
areas in Germany, so the Bing images are now automatically CC-BY-SA.
No, they are not.
If they did that (I haven't followed the related threads and I don't
know
Am 29. März 2012 11:51 schrieb Elena ``of Valhalla'' elena.valha...@gmail.com:
Having a license applying in an automatic way would not make sense:
consider the case of product X owned by A and given under a restrictive
license to B (the usual case with areal pics, btw); if B used
X together
All,
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 3:51 AM, Elena ``of Valhalla''
elena.valha...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2012-03-29 at 11:06:38 +0200, Jochen Topf wrote:
The storage part is not true any more. Bing used OSM data to mask out
military
areas in Germany, so the Bing images are now automatically
Disclaimer: I'm not a lawyer, but I have studied copyright law and cases
and have actual friend as copyright lawyer (rarity even these days).
There are many ways how this is not even close to any substantial
copyright violation, and very few how it could be.
First of all, there's not enough
Hi,
On 03/29/2012 04:53 PM, Peteris Krisjanis wrote:
First of all, there's not enough proof of copyright violation. There's
no proof that assumed deravative work is generated using our work
That was my position initially as well but it has meanwhile been proven
beyond reasonable doubt, and
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 05:53:12PM +0300, Peteris Krisjanis wrote:
Disclaimer: I'm not a lawyer, but I have studied copyright law and cases
and have actual friend as copyright lawyer (rarity even these days).
There are many ways how this is not even close to any substantial
copyright
Hi,
Does anyone know of applications in the OSM ecosystem that systematically
download large areas' worth of Bing Aerial tiles?
The license[0] implies that this is not allowed because 1) you cannot
'copy, store, archive, or create a database of the content' (par.2) and 2)
you must be 'using only
11 matches
Mail list logo
