On Mon, June 13, 2011 14:45, Nick Hocking wrote:
I just added some more new roads to the Canberra area. They were rendered
in Bing maps within 10 seconds of uploading to OSM!!!
Now that's instant gratification. Also bing maps are the slippiest
around by a healthy margin. I can be zoomed in,
Hi Grant
http://www.bing.com/maps/explore/#5003/s=wp=c/5872/style=Mapniklat=-35.206078lon=149.103028z=17pid=50735
Tose are the newly added roads. Ive been using Bing's mapnik facility for a
few months now - It's really good.
___
talk mailing list
I was going to say something similar about the main OSM mapnik rendering.
Last night the high zoom level had rendered by the time I had closed
Potlatch2.
Well done to those running our rendering servers!
Graham
from my phone
On 13 Jun 2011 07:04, Grant Slater openstreet...@firefishy.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 04:07:33PM +1000, Nick Hocking wrote:
http://www.bing.com/maps/explore/#5003/s=wp=c/5872/style=Mapniklat=-35.206078lon=149.103028z=17pid=50735
Tose are the newly added roads. Ive been using Bing's mapnik facility for a
few months now - It's really good.
That
Jochen,
I see attribution on my browser (bottom left corner). Rendering is, I think
standard mapnik, looks ok to me.
Andrew E, did you try my link and zoom over to Korea. I think you'll find
all the OSM data there looking quite good.
Cheers
Nick
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Jochen Topf
On Mon, June 13, 2011 16:07, Nick Hocking wrote:
Jochen,
I see attribution on my browser (bottom left corner). Rendering is, I
think standard mapnik, looks ok to me.
Andrew E, did you try my link and zoom over to Korea. I think you'll find
all the OSM data there looking quite good.
I
On 13 June 2011 17:07, Nick Hocking nick.hock...@gmail.com wrote:
Jochen,
I see attribution on my browser (bottom left corner). Rendering is, I think
standard mapnik, looks ok to me.
Andrew E, did you try my link and zoom over to Korea. I think you'll find
all the OSM data there looking
http://www.bing.com/maps/explore/#5003/s=wp=c/5872/style=Mapniklat=37.506163lon=127.050212z=14pid=50735
Works for me. But I'll go check out Yahoo and Google and see what the diffs
are
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Andrew Errington
a.erring...@lancaster.ac.uk wrote:
On Mon, June 13, 2011
2011 07:08
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [OSM-talk] Bing Maps are amazing
Hi Grant
http://www.bing.com/maps/explore/#5003/s=w
http://www.bing.com/maps/explore/#5003/s=wp=c/5872/style=Mapnikla
t=-35.206078lon=149.103028z=17pid=50735
p=c/5872/style=Mapniklat=-35.206078lon=149.103028z
On 13 June 2011 18:01, Ed Loach e...@loach.me.uk wrote:
If I recall correctly, the Mapnik “Openstreetmap Mode” requires Silverlight,
so the link below might show you a different view if you don’t have it
installed. Or perhaps I’m thinking of the Map App, if that is different?
I'd forgotten
On Mon, June 13, 2011 17:01, Ed Loach wrote:
If I recall correctly, the Mapnik #65533;Openstreetmap Mode#65533;
requires
Silverlight, so the link below might show you a different view if
you don#65533;t have it installed. Or perhaps I#65533;m thinking of
the Map App, if
that is different?
On 13.06.2011 08:01, Grant Slater wrote:
Do you mean Bing or MapQuest? I wasn't aware that Bing was using OSM data yet.
Example link?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bing#OpenStreetMap_via_the_Bing_Maps_APIs
http://www.bing.com/maps/explore/#5003/s=w/5872/style=Mapnikpid=50735
needs
2011/6/13 Stephan Knauss o...@stephans-server.de:
needs Silverlight
that is really amazing...
I don't have silverlight so I only get their dumb standard map...
cheers,
Martin
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
at 05:07:31PM +1000, Nick Hocking wrote:
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:07:31 +1000
From: Nick Hocking nick.hock...@gmail.com
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Bing Maps are amazing
Jochen,
I see attribution on my browser (bottom left corner). Rendering is, I think
standard
On 13.06.2011 11:44, Jochen Topf wrote:
FF 3.6.17 on Linux, no Silverlight.
This seams to be the reason. Bing should not silently fall back to other
data but nag you to install Silverlight.
I CC'ed Steve.
@Steve: Consider a nag screen or even better provide the tiles using the
plain JS API
On 13/06/11 11:29, Stephan Knauss wrote:
This seams to be the reason. Bing should not silently fall back to other
data but nag you to install Silverlight.
I'd rather it didn't because I'm not going to install Silverlight (in
fact I couldn't even if I wanted to). It would be a lot better if it
On 13.06.2011 12:40, Borbus wrote:
On 13/06/11 11:29, Stephan Knauss wrote:
This seams to be the reason. Bing should not silently fall back to other
data but nag you to install Silverlight.
I'd rather it didn't because I'm not going to install Silverlight (in
fact I couldn't even if I wanted
On 13/06/2011 16:34, Stephan Knauss wrote:
As long as MS wants to promote Silverlight using the OSM layer they
should at least not silently fall back to another map. So either serve
OSM with plain JS or tell the user it won't.
If you believe the news / rumour sites, they might not be
18 matches
Mail list logo
