2011/5/29 Borbus bor...@gmail.com:
I think a much more useful application than those suggested already is
to identify all of the bridges that cross over a way. It's easy to find
all of the ways that go under a way, but what use is that? It's quite
important for waterways in general to be
I think a much more useful application than those suggested already is
to identify all of the bridges that cross over a way. It's easy to find
all of the ways that go under a way, but what use is that? It's quite
important for waterways in general to be able to find every bridge that
will be
Hi
This wiki page:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Bridges_and_Tunnels
talks about adding a relation to the way going under the bridge.
This statement:
allows both the way(s) crossing the structure /and/ those passing under
it to be identified (river and most canals
Dave F. wrote:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Bridges_and_Tunnels
[...]
This statement:
allows both the way(s) crossing the structure /and/ those passing under
it to be identified (river and most canals bridges only pass /over/ the
waterway, and using only the Way tag
On 28-5-2011 18:46, Tobias Knerr wrote:
With a relation, these calculations would not be necessary.
The people that come up with these types of relations seem to forget
that spatial data is what OSM is all about.
For instance, using the osm2pgsql schema:
5 matches
Mail list logo