Anybody object to adopting a Code of Conduct for behaviour with
OpenStreetMap mailing lists, fora, blogs, and other communication
channels? Would anyone find it a burden to keep their expression
within the guidelines expressed in the first portion of the Code of
Conduct DRAFT found here?
Am 16.10.2010 10:05, schrieb Richard Weait:
Anybody object to adopting a Code of Conduct for behaviour with
OpenStreetMap mailing lists, fora, blogs, and other communication
channels?
Yes, unless absolutely necessary (which I currently can't see), we
should *absolutely* avoid such guidelines.
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 7:36 PM, Ulf Lamping ulf.lamp...@googlemail.com wrote:
In the long run they tend to do more harm than good.
Hi, can you give an example of this? I'm at a loss to understand how
asking people to follow simple rules like be collaborative and be
considerate could end up
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 4:05 AM, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
Anybody object to adopting a Code of Conduct for behaviour with
OpenStreetMap mailing lists, fora, blogs, and other communication
channels? Would anyone find it a burden to keep their expression
within the guidelines
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 7:36 PM, Ulf Lamping ulf.lamp...@googlemail.com
wrote:
In the long run they tend to do more harm than good.
Hi, can you give an example of this? I'm at a loss to understand how
asking people
On 16 October 2010 19:08, Al Haraka alhar...@gmail.com wrote:
initiatives mentioned before. However, I think we should keep it
plain and simple and remove some caustic behavior that seems to be
returning to the list after a hiatus. Collaboration and consideration
Most of the caustic
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 12:13 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 16 October 2010 19:08, Al Haraka alhar...@gmail.com wrote:
initiatives mentioned before. However, I think we should keep it
plain and simple and remove some caustic behavior that seems to be
returning to the list
On 16 October 2010 19:21, Al Haraka alhar...@gmail.com wrote:
I did not single out anyone on purpose, because this is not going to
be productive OR solve the current issue. Whether it is SteveC or any
This thread/idea started because of suggestions made previously by
SteveC and now he's the
Am 16.10.2010 10:54, schrieb Steve Bennett:
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 7:36 PM, Ulf Lampingulf.lamp...@googlemail.com wrote:
In the long run they tend to do more harm than good.
Hi, can you give an example of this?
The german Wikipedia has so much please do this, please read that ,
please
On Sat, 16 Oct 2010 11:32:32 +0200
Ulf Lamping ulf.lamp...@googlemail.com wrote:
I'm very much in favour of adopting such a policy. At the very
least, we can then stop debating whether or not we need such
policies, and whether or not people's behaviour is harmful - we can
simply discuss
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 8:06 PM, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
As an alternative, consider email filters. Filters can be per sender
or per keyword, depending on your email system.
I guess these are two totally different schools of thought:
1) There is one community, one pool of
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 8:32 PM, Ulf Lamping ulf.lamp...@googlemail.com wrote:
The german Wikipedia has so much please do this, please read that ,
please follow ..., ... that it turns out to be no more fun working there.
I've almost stopped it for exact this reason.
And the English Wikipedia
Am 16.10.2010 14:15, schrieb Steve Bennett:
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 8:32 PM, Ulf Lampingulf.lamp...@googlemail.com wrote:
The german Wikipedia has so much please do this, please read that ,
please follow ..., ... that it turns out to be no more fun working there.
I've almost stopped it for
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 4:05 AM, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
Anybody object to adopting a Code of Conduct for behaviour with
OpenStreetMap mailing lists, fora, blogs, and other communication
channels?
It's a good idea in theory, but I'm afraid it wouldn't work in
practice within
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 4:05 AM, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
Anybody object to adopting a Code of Conduct for behaviour with
OpenStreetMap mailing lists, fora, blogs, and other communication
channels? Would anyone find it a burden to keep their expression
within the guidelines
Oh hardly. All I have done is call out Anthony and link to the things he denies
about wikipedia.
You, too, are another example of someone using a fake name and occasionally
trolling,
Steve
stevecoast.com
On Oct 16, 2010, at 3:13 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 16 October
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 11:55 PM, Ulf Lamping
ulf.lamp...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hmmm, you obviously did not read the Violations_and_Enforcement section of
the wiki page :-(
My mistake. Yeah, it's not well worded. It has a top-down heavy-handed
feel to it: Be good. Or bad things will happen to
On 17 October 2010 00:36, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
Oh hardly. All I have done is call out Anthony and link to the things he
denies about wikipedia.
What specifically has any of that to do with OSM?
You, too, are another example of someone using a fake name and occasionally
Steve
stevecoast.com
On Oct 16, 2010, at 8:43 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 17 October 2010 00:36, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
Oh hardly. All I have done is call out Anthony and link to the things he
denies about wikipedia.
What specifically has any of that to
On 17 October 2010 00:58, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
I wish i had a pony.
This is why things end up in a endless debate, people pose serious
questions and you either can't be bothered, or won't respond properly
so the debate can move forward.
Well that's kind of hilarious given you cut out the first half of my email
where I exactly answered your question Duane.
Steve
stevecoast.com
On Oct 16, 2010, at 9:02 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 17 October 2010 00:58, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
I wish i had a
On 17 October 2010 01:16, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
Well that's kind of hilarious given you cut out the first half of my email
where I exactly answered your question Duane.
What ever you say Mark, but then again I've come to expect side
stepping from you, making any claim you wish
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 4:02 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 17 October 2010 00:58, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
I wish i had a pony.
This is why things end up in a endless debate, people pose serious
questions and you either can't be bothered, or won't respond properly
Fair point Dave. I'm joining you guys and filtering from now on.
:0:
* ^(to|cc|bcc).*...@inbox.org|\
^(to|cc|bcc).*deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com|\
^(to|cc|bcc).*ed...@billiau.net
.spam/
On Oct 16, 2010, at 9:25 AM, Dave Stubbs wrote:
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 4:02 PM, John Smith
On Saturday 16 October 2010 17:40:36 SteveC wrote:
:0:
* ^(to|cc|bcc).*...@inbox.org|\
^(to|cc|bcc).*deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com|\
^(to|cc|bcc).*ed...@billiau.net
.spam/
:0:
* ^(to|cc|bcc).*...@inbox.org|\
^(to|cc|bcc).*deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com|\
^(to|cc|bcc).*ed...@billiau.net
On Oct 16, 2010, at 9:50 AM, Iván Sánchez Ortega wrote:
On Saturday 16 October 2010 17:40:36 SteveC wrote:
:0:
* ^(to|cc|bcc).*...@inbox.org|\
^(to|cc|bcc).*deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com|\
^(to|cc|bcc).*ed...@billiau.net
.spam/
:0:
* ^(to|cc|bcc).*...@inbox.org|\
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 10:36 AM, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
Oh hardly. All I have done is call out Anthony and link to the things he
denies about wikipedia.
1) You've done much more than that, publicly insulting many people
other than myself.
2) Even if your claims about me were true,
On Sat, 16 Oct 2010 09:40:36 -0600
SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
Fair point Dave. I'm joining you guys and filtering from now on.
:0:
* ^(to|cc|bcc).*...@inbox.org|\
^(to|cc|bcc).*deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com|\
^(to|cc|bcc).*ed...@billiau.net
.spam/
This is why I find this
28 matches
Mail list logo
