David Earl wrote:
> Would it really be that much slower: yes it is more work, but OTOH, it
> is fewer disk writes?
The daily diffs are approximately 6MB of data to write but take a couple
of minutes to produce. The disk overhead is negligible. But this also
means that the compression overhead
On Monday 23 June 2008 15:33:17 80n wrote:
> Osmaxpi uses the minute diffs which have proven to be very reliable.
>
> Occasionally, I'll run a resync against the whole planet file just to make
> sure that everything is tickety-boo, but I haven't needed to do that for a
> long time.
>
> 80n
That's
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 9:44 AM, Frederik Ramm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > The coastline checker won't see anything after the 19th because the
> > daily diff for that day is missing. Either the diff will appear or it
> > will resync on the next planet dump.
>
> That's a problem I am hav
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 10:44 AM, Frederik Ramm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Would it be possible to issue "extra" planet dumps after events that disrupt
> the diff chain, like we had last week? So that those who rely on diffs for a
> current version of the data have a clean start to work on, witho
On 23/06/2008 12:00, Brett Henderson wrote:
> Frederik Ramm wrote:
>> Sure, I can do that. I was assuming they would somehow be incomplete
>> as well but if they are ok then I can just switch to using these.
> The hourly & minute are definitely more reliable than daily. I won't be
> surprised to
Frederik Ramm wrote:
> Sure, I can do that. I was assuming they would somehow be incomplete
> as well but if they are ok then I can just switch to using these.
The hourly & minute are definitely more reliable than daily. I won't be
surprised to see missing data in daily files. If you see *any*
Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> A third option would be to simply save the last 24 diffs and then
> concatenate them appropriately. Some XML mangling may be required,
> but that's certainly less of a processing burden than to go to the
> database for information you already did extract
True, that would a
Hi,
> I never got around to checking out what happened to the diffs during
> that period, apologies. Are you sure that there's a gap in data?
I was assuming there must be, but I might be wrong. Osmosis doesn't
refuse to apply a diff even if some of the objects arent' there. (Which
is a good
I never got around to checking out what happened to the diffs during
that period, apologies. Are you sure that there's a gap in data? It
isn't a huge amount of effort to re-generate a daily file, that can be
generated at any time.
I'm not sure how simple it is for you to utilise, but the hour
Hi,
> The coastline checker won't see anything after the 19th because the
> daily diff for that day is missing. Either the diff will appear or it
> will resync on the next planet dump.
That's a problem I am having (for the Geofabrik Excerpts) as well - once
a daily diff has failed, I'm stuck for
10 matches
Mail list logo
