Hi guys, based on the latest information, the start of
database/license migration activities on the server side will most
likely be on April 1, NOT March 27. So we have a few more days to
clean up. :)
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 4:36 PM, maning sambale
emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com wrote:
The planned
Here's is the revised schedule:
http://blog.osmfoundation.org/2012/03/27/service-schedule-march-april-2012/
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 4:00 AM, Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi guys, based on the latest information, the start of
database/license migration activities on the server
On Mar 24, 2012, at 9:52 AM, Toby Murray wrote:
I had someone respond to my license change email saying that they had
agreed to the new license and had checked the PD checkbox so that
their edits wouldn't be a concern in any future license change. Of
course with the new CT that wouldn't be a
Simon Poole writes:
We've been through this multiple times, but here we go again:
Obviously not enough times, because I hadn't heard of this before. I
was under the impression that when I said that my edits were in the
public domain, everybody believed me. I think other people probably
think
Am 24.03.2012 16:42, schrieb Russ Nelson:
Sorry to keep pushing so hard on this, but why delete map data
unnecessarily? Why delete MY data unnecessarily?
The first question you ask here I can take as serious: good one, and
IMHO you're right, I cannot say, why the OSMF don't want to count data
Am 24.03.2012 16:42, schrieb Russ Nelson:
Simon Poole writes:
b) the meaning of the PD-checkbox can't be reinterpreted after the fact
Yes, it can, and it should be. If I make a public declaration that I
do not intend to pursue copyright claims against anybody, or that I
think
Simon Poole writes:
http://www.osmfoundation.org/wiki/License/We_Are_Changing_The_License#What_Are_The_Choices.3F
What if someone refuses to choose? What is the policy there? If you
choose not to decide you still have made a choice, and the
implications of that choice are not described.
A series of people have expressed doubts on this thread that the proposed
rebuild plan is realistic and I haven't seen a response to this here.
If the current schedule is not realistic - is there an update to it in the
works?
Do we need to expect an extended time period of OpenStreetMap being
We've been through this multiple times, but here we go again:
a) there is no one to one relationship between wiki accounts and osm
accounts
b) the meaning of the PD-checkbox can't be reinterpreted after the fact
(yes it was not a very good idea to make it non-binding, but that is the
way it is)
Il giorno 22/mar/2012 11:00, Simon Poole si...@poole.ch ha scritto:
c) we are providing mechanisms (changeset level overrides, adoption)
that allow PD data to be carried forward, preferably after consultation
with the mapper in question
Simon
If PD option is a problem, users can have a
Not quite sure what your question is, but yes naturally any user that
hasn't agreed to the CTs can still agree and have his data included (at
least up to mid next week).
This should not be a problem for anybody that considers their
contributions PD anyway, but this is OSM, you can make a problem
Il giorno 22/mar/2012 11:14, Simon Poole si...@poole.ch ha scritto:
Not quite sure what your question is, but yes naturally any user that
hasn't agreed to the CTs can still agree and have his data included (at
least up to mid next week).
Nope, I've accepted long time ago but I checked the PD
The PD check box doesn't influence anything, so as a consequence it
doesn't cause any problems either.
Simon
Am 22.03.2012 11:20, schrieb sabas88:
Il giorno 22/mar/2012 11:14, Simon Poole si...@poole.ch
mailto:si...@poole.ch ha scritto:
Not quite sure what your question is, but yes
The planned db rebuild to switch to a new license (ODBL) will start in
March 27, 2012.
According to this page:
http://odbl.poole.ch/phillippines-20120213-20120314-poly.html , the
Philippines is ~94-98% ODBL compliant.
A webmap showing where areas are affected is here:
See http://www.osmfoundation.org/wiki/License/Rebuild_Plan
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On 21/03/12 08:26, Simon Poole wrote:
See http://www.osmfoundation.org/wiki/License/Rebuild_Plan
I think that date is very unlikely to be met.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 4:39 AM, Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu wrote:
On 21/03/12 08:26, Simon Poole wrote:
See http://www.osmfoundation.org/wiki/License/Rebuild_Plan
I think that date is very unlikely to be met.
Putting it a little differently, how confident is the Rebuild Team
that all of
Hi,
On Wed, 21 Mar 2012 06:17:06 -0400
Josh Doe j...@joshdoe.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 4:39 AM, Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu wrote:
On 21/03/12 08:26, Simon Poole wrote:
See http://www.osmfoundation.org/wiki/License/Rebuild_Plan
I think that date is very unlikely to be met.
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 7:39 PM, Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu wrote:
I think that date is very unlikely to be met.
I sincerely hope they don't even try. This is an entirely self-imposed
deadline with no external drivers at all - let's take our time and get
the best result possible.
Steve
Frederik Ramm wrote:
The April 1st proclamation did a lot of good in the past months because people
understood that we were serious, but clinging to it*now* is likely to
lead an unnecessarily downtime and sloppy work,
As I have said in the past ... any existing user who has not accepted the
東です。
4/1に向けたスケジュールが本日OSMFより公開されましたので
一部訳しました。
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSMFJ/License/Rebuild_Plan
量が多く訳し切れなかったので可能な方がおられましたらヘルプお願いします。
非互換データは物理削除ではなく、判断用の項目をひとつ増やして
論理的に削除する（APIで見せなくする）方向のようですね。
-- Forwarded message --
From: Simon Poole si...@poole.ch
Date: Wed, 21
21 matches
Mail list logo
