On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 12:37 AM, Brendan Morley morb@beagle.com.au wrote:
On 11/06/2011 10:02 AM, Nic Roets wrote:
Not at all - I know of no form of democracy that distinguishes between
grudging acceptance or evangelical zeal.
Dermot,
I would quite like to take my data and start my
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Nic Roets nro...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm much more worried about the effects of a fork. If we spend time
updating a number of forks, it will detract from time that we could
have spent mapping.
It's much better if we a democratic process and settle the license
On 12 June 2011 19:29, Nic Roets nro...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm much more worried about the effects of a fork. If we spend time
updating a number of forks, it will detract from time that we could
have spent mapping.
I was in that frame of thinking 3-6 months ago, but unless something
radical
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 11:42 AM, Mike Dupont
jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com wrote:
The code is the law,
http://www.lessig.org/content/standard/0,1902,4165,00.html and we need to
change the code so that these discussions about licensing and all that are
less important.
If it was easy,
I am not saying it is easy.
But if you keep most imports as thier own layers and only merge when
trusted, look at how git manages many branches, you pull only from trusted
branches. In my module TIGER would be its own layer that would not be
merged at all, it would be kept separate. You would
On 11/06/2011 10:02 AM, Nic Roets wrote:
Not at all - I know of no form of democracy that distinguishes between
grudging acceptance or evangelical zeal.
Dermot,
I would quite like to take my data and start my own PD / CC0 project.
Nic,
Before you go doing that, please consider the
6 matches
Mail list logo
