://www.soc.org.uk/
SoC conference 2008:
http://www.abdn.ac.uk/cartographers08/
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stephen Wing
Sent: 01 April 2008 07:05
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Mapping Mottram and Tintwistle proposed bypass
On 31/03
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Simon Hewison
Sent: 04 April 2008 16:56
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Mapping Mottram and Tintwistle proposed bypass
Steve Chilton wrote:
Stephen - Presume you are reasonably local to area mentioned in your
note.
I have often wondered about
Steve Chilton wrote:
Stephen - Presume you are reasonably local to area mentioned in your note.
I have often wondered about an artefact at the lower end of the M1:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=51.60727lon=-0.24076zoom=17layers=B0FT
] [mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Stephen Wing
*Sent:* 01 April 2008 07:05
*To:* talk@openstreetmap.org
*Subject:* Re: [OSM-talk] Mapping Mottram and Tintwistle proposed bypass
On 31/03/2008, *Jon Burgess* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have deployed Steve's changes and one example which
On 01/04/2008, Norbert Hoffmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, so how do I tag a section of highway that is going to be grubbed up
and
returned to nature (which is happening for short sections of the A14 at
Haughley Bends)?
highway=trunk
construction=disused
I think
highway=disused
At 09:01 AM 4/2/2008, Stephen Wing wrote:
On 01/04/2008, Norbert Hoffmann
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, so how do I tag a section of highway that is going to be grubbed up and
returned to nature (which is happening for short sections of the A14 at
Haughley Bends)?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stephen Wing wrote:
| On 01/04/2008, *Norbert Hoffmann* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|
| Ok, so how do I tag a section of highway that is going to be grubbed
| up and
| returned to nature (which is happening for
Message-
From: Jon Burgess [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 31 March 2008 23:31
To: Peter Miller
Cc: 'Steve Chilton'; 'Dave Stubbs'; 'Talk Openstreetmap'
Subject: [Spam] Re: [OSM-talk] Mapping Mottram and Tintwistle proposed
bypass
I have deployed Steve's changes and one example which has
Peter Miller wrote:
Ok, so how do I tag a section of highway that is going to be grubbed up and
returned to nature (which is happening for short sections of the A14 at
Haughley Bends)?
I am currently using the following coding:
highway=trunk
construction=disused
Does that seem ok?
I think
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 10:08 PM, Peter Miller
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for that Robert. A few other questions:
1) How does one tag something that is being considered seriously (such as
the Mottram Tintwistle bypass), but which may well never get built? I think
I will just put the
) Munro; Talk Openstreetmap
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Mapping Mottram and Tintwistle proposed bypass
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 10:08 PM, Peter Miller
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for that Robert. A few other questions:
1) How does one tag something that is being considered seriously
Subject: RE: [OSM-talk] Mapping Mottram and Tintwistle proposed bypass
In an attempt to avoid this kind of false tagging for rendering I have a
submitted an addition to the mapnik style tonight.
It will render highway=construction or highway=proposed from z12 upwards.
It will also render a text
: [OSM-talk] Mapping Mottram and Tintwistle proposed bypass
Excellent. Thanks Steve.
So how should a proposed road be tagged? Should it be highway=proposed
Proposed=trunk Name=foo bypass?
Peter
-Original
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 31 March 2008 20:53
To: Dave Stubbs; Peter Miller
Cc: Talk Openstreetmap
Subject: RE: [OSM-talk] Mapping Mottram and Tintwistle proposed bypass
In an attempt to avoid this kind of false tagging for rendering I have a
submitted an addition to the mapnik
Andy Robinson wrote:
Something
like highway=trunk and proposed=true would be good enough for me.
If you make that highway=proposed and proposed=trunk only those, that want
to render proposed streets, have to change their rulefiles.
On Mar 29, 2008, at 09:39, Andy Robinson wrote:
On 28/03/2008, Peter Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) How does one tag something that is being considered seriously
(such as
the Mottram Tintwistle bypass), but which may well never get built?
I think
I will just put the estimated build
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Peter Miller wrote:
|
| This job does raise an important question about how to map and model
| proposed roads. We have used the tags ‘highway=trunk’ and ‘tunnel=yes’
| and name=’Mottram … bypass (proposed)’, ‘proposed=trunk’ and added a
| note. It
-
From: Robert (Jamie) Munro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 28 March 2008 12:29
To: Peter Miller; Talk Openstreetmap
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Mapping Mottram and Tintwistle proposed bypass
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Peter Miller wrote:
|
| This job does raise
18 matches
Mail list logo
