On Mar 29, 2008, at 09:39, Andy Robinson wrote: > On 28/03/2008, Peter Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> 1) How does one tag something that is being considered seriously >> (such as >> the Mottram Tintwistle bypass), but which may well never get built? >> I think >> I will just put the estimated build date given by the highways >> agency for >> now. (I will also continue to use the tunnel trick to get it to >> render in >> the mean time).
> On the basis that we only put data into the project relating to > physical objects I dont think we should put any items in that "might" > get built. This should really go into a separate layer... If consensus is that this data should not go in the database, I'd suggest creating it in JOSM and saving to a .osm file. Then if you want to create a map that shows the proposed highway, you could include this file in the input to the renderer. Personally, I don't see any harm in adding the data to the OSM database for now -- it certainly shouldn't get rendered on the main maps, but that can be achieved by appropriate tagging. Cheers Robert _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
