> People want to introduce new stuff.
'Nobody' corrects old stuff. (Or more correctly few improve old stuff ...
like sport=football.)
As a validator I spend most of my time fixing things. If a HOT mapper has
been mapping for a day and draws a motorway between two small villages two
kilometers
On 09-Nov-17 07:47 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
sent from a phone
On 8. Nov 2017, at 18:47, Andy Townsend > wrote:
This is certainly how the centre of London got mapped, and many other
places too I suspect
we still have some of them
sent from a phone
> On 8. Nov 2017, at 18:47, Andy Townsend wrote:
>
> This is certainly how the centre of London got mapped, and many other places
> too I suspect
we still have some of them lingering around in the middle of the center and
nobody seems to see it as
sent from a phone
> On 8. Nov 2017, at 16:23, Andrew Buck wrote:
>
> If it is an untagged way that covers the whole block of buildings I
> would say just delete it.
I’ve seen this also in places around me, and when I knew the situation I
retagged them from building
What you can also do is map 1 new building properly and then use replace
geometry, if history seems important enough to preserve.
Polyglot
2017-11-08 18:47 GMT+01:00 Andy Townsend :
> On 08/11/2017 17:40, john whelan wrote:
>
>> ... and to be honest how does one correct this
On 08/11/2017 17:40, john whelan wrote:
... and to be honest how does one correct this stuff? Move the points
so only one building is mapped? Delete and redraw would be faster but
then you lose the history.
There are lots of examples in OSM of things being mapped "roughly" first
and then
These days most of my time is spent "validating" on HOT projects. I've
found that if I can give feedback to the mapper within 24 hrs we usually
get more mapping from them and of higher quality. Then I find you get into
diminishing returns. At three months afterwards quite often you'll get no
>
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/330511654#map=16/20.5184/-13.0507
>
> But you really need to zoom in using JOSM to see the problem.
>
> The best way to describe it is the road network is a grid but each block of
> buildings has been mapped as a single building rather than the six to a
>
On 08/11/2017 12:51, john whelan wrote:
One mapper has a thousand untagged ways in Mauritania most of which
are of this type. I have sent a note to them but not yet heard
anything back.
You may have already also done some of these, for completeness and for
the benefit of anyone unfamiliar
If it is an untagged way that covers the whole block of buildings I
would say just delete it. It is not accurate data anyway, so not really
worth keeping. I know we try very hard to clean up data from newbies,
but this I think is beyond the point where it makes sense to.
-AndrewBuck
On
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/330511654#map=16/20.5184/-13.0507
But you really need to zoom in using JOSM to see the problem.
The best way to describe it is the road network is a grid but each block of
buildings has been mapped as a single building rather than the six to a
dozen separate
11 matches
Mail list logo