Re: [OSM-talk] Odd mapping in Atar Mauritania

2017-11-08 Thread john whelan
> People want to introduce new stuff. 'Nobody' corrects old stuff. (Or more correctly few improve old stuff ... like sport=football.) As a validator I spend most of my time fixing things. If a HOT mapper has been mapping for a day and draws a motorway between two small villages two kilometers

Re: [OSM-talk] Odd mapping in Atar Mauritania

2017-11-08 Thread Warin
On 09-Nov-17 07:47 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: sent from a phone On 8. Nov 2017, at 18:47, Andy Townsend > wrote: This is certainly how the centre of London got mapped, and many other places too I suspect we still have some of them

Re: [OSM-talk] Odd mapping in Atar Mauritania

2017-11-08 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 8. Nov 2017, at 18:47, Andy Townsend wrote: > > This is certainly how the centre of London got mapped, and many other places > too I suspect we still have some of them lingering around in the middle of the center and nobody seems to see it as

Re: [OSM-talk] Odd mapping in Atar Mauritania

2017-11-08 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 8. Nov 2017, at 16:23, Andrew Buck wrote: > > If it is an untagged way that covers the whole block of buildings I > would say just delete it. I’ve seen this also in places around me, and when I knew the situation I retagged them from building

Re: [OSM-talk] Odd mapping in Atar Mauritania

2017-11-08 Thread Jo
What you can also do is map 1 new building properly and then use replace geometry, if history seems important enough to preserve. Polyglot 2017-11-08 18:47 GMT+01:00 Andy Townsend : > On 08/11/2017 17:40, john whelan wrote: > >> ... and to be honest how does one correct this

Re: [OSM-talk] Odd mapping in Atar Mauritania

2017-11-08 Thread Andy Townsend
On 08/11/2017 17:40, john whelan wrote: ... and to be honest how does one correct this stuff?  Move the points so only one building is mapped?  Delete and redraw would be faster but then you lose the history. There are lots of examples in OSM of things being mapped "roughly" first and then

Re: [OSM-talk] Odd mapping in Atar Mauritania

2017-11-08 Thread john whelan
These days most of my time is spent "validating" on HOT projects. I've found that if I can give feedback to the mapper within 24 hrs we usually get more mapping from them and of higher quality. Then I find you get into diminishing returns. At three months afterwards quite often you'll get no

Re: [OSM-talk] Odd mapping in Atar Mauritania

2017-11-08 Thread Volker Schmidt
> > http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/330511654#map=16/20.5184/-13.0507 > > But you really need to zoom in using JOSM to see the problem. > > The best way to describe it is the road network is a grid but each block of > buildings has been mapped as a single building rather than the six to a >

Re: [OSM-talk] Odd mapping in Atar Mauritania

2017-11-08 Thread Andy Townsend
On 08/11/2017 12:51, john whelan wrote: One mapper has a thousand untagged ways in Mauritania most of which are of this type.  I have sent a note to them but not yet heard anything back. You may have already also done some of these, for completeness and for the benefit of anyone unfamiliar

Re: [OSM-talk] Odd mapping in Atar Mauritania

2017-11-08 Thread Andrew Buck
If it is an untagged way that covers the whole block of buildings I would say just delete it. It is not accurate data anyway, so not really worth keeping. I know we try very hard to clean up data from newbies, but this I think is beyond the point where it makes sense to. -AndrewBuck On

[OSM-talk] Odd mapping in Atar Mauritania

2017-11-08 Thread john whelan
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/330511654#map=16/20.5184/-13.0507 But you really need to zoom in using JOSM to see the problem. The best way to describe it is the road network is a grid but each block of buildings has been mapped as a single building rather than the six to a dozen separate