Erik Johansson wrote:
FTR I think you all should map for child strollers and add
ramp=yes/no tag to steps.. :-)
You may be kidding, but that actually is a useful feature for wheelchair
access - wheelchair routing is a special case of pedestrian routing,
that requires this sort of tag...
On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 9:48 PM, Jens Müller b...@tessarakt.de wrote:
Am 03.05.2010 19:29, schrieb Richard Mann:
I think routers would be better served if we identify good through
routes (ie the equivalent of highway=primary for motorists), and
record them as relations,
I thought a router is
I don't care very much about your routes, if they have to figure out in OSM
or not and how to tag them. What I don't want is to see the roads, streets,
avenues, boulevards cut at each intersection because some route is turning
left or turning right at that point.
I start to see this in Paris where
On 09.05.2010 13:18, Jens Müller wrote:
Am 03.05.2010 13:31, schrieb Felix Hartmann:
Subject: Philosophy about Autorouting for Cyclists and new key
class:bicycle
What do you mean by Autorouting? Something else than just routing?
Well when I say autorouting I mean that a computer
Hey Felix
In OpenSatNav we use the phrase turn by turn routing or turn by turn
navigation. Some call it real time or live navigation.
Steve
On 10 May 2010 15:05, Felix Hartmann extremecar...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 09.05.2010 13:18, Jens Müller wrote:
Am 03.05.2010 13:31, schrieb Felix
Am 03.05.2010 13:31, schrieb Felix Hartmann:
Subject: Philosophy about Autorouting for Cyclists and new key
class:bicycle
What do you mean by Autorouting? Something else than just routing?
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 10:48 PM, Jens Müller b...@tessarakt.de wrote:
Am 03.05.2010 19:29, schrieb Richard Mann:
I think routers would be better served if we identify good through
routes (ie the equivalent of highway=primary for motorists), and
record them as relations,
I thought a router is
Am 09.05.2010 21:16, schrieb Erik Johansson:
On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 10:48 PM, Jens Müllerb...@tessarakt.de wrote:
Am 03.05.2010 19:29, schrieb Richard Mann:
I think routers would be better served if we identify good through
routes (ie the equivalent of highway=primary for motorists),
Felix Hartmann wrote:
On 03.05.2010 21:47, Ben Laenen wrote:
Here's the thing: we just do not map unofficial routes. Only the ones
that are signposted. There are enough sites where you can submit your
route suggestions, and there's no reason why this should be in the OSM
database.
Well
On 04.05.2010 11:40, Ben Laenen wrote:
Felix Hartmann wrote:
On 03.05.2010 21:47, Ben Laenen wrote:
Here's the thing: we just do not map unofficial routes. Only the ones
that are signposted. There are enough sites where you can submit your
route suggestions, and there's no
Richard Mann wrote:
I think routers would be better served if we identify good through
routes (ie the equivalent of highway=primary for motorists), and
record them as relations, perhaps
network=lcn+status=unofficial+signposted=no. But Andy's a strict
objectivist, which rather gets in the
On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 10:19:39AM +0200, Jean-Marc Liotier wrote:
After fifteen years of riding across Paris, I have developed a pretty
good mental model of the city. I would not be capable of describing my
routing algorithm offhand, but it features (in decreasing order of
objectivity)
You may be interested in the CycloPath project. http://cyclopath.org/
It is an OSM-like project for bicycle routes in Minneapolis - St.
Paul, Minnesota, USA. A user can edit the cycle 'ways' and rate
preferences for different ways. CycloPath can then generate
preferable routes for that user.
Even though there is a huge userbase in OSM that are avic cyclists, most
of the information is still car centric, even though there are good
intentions to change this. The problem is, we are living in a motorcar
centric society, hence our whole road network is based on the idea to
enable
I think routers would be better served if we identify good through
routes (ie the equivalent of highway=primary for motorists), and
record them as relations, perhaps
network=lcn+status=unofficial+signposted=no. But Andy's a strict
objectivist, which rather gets in the way of documenting this sort
On 03.05.2010 19:29, Richard Mann wrote:
I think routers would be better served if we identify good through
routes (ie the equivalent of highway=primary for motorists), and
record them as relations, perhaps
network=lcn+status=unofficial+signposted=no. But Andy's a strict
objectivist, which
Felix Hartmann wrote:
If in OSM we really want to get in more mountainbikers, we have to start
with unofficial routes. I will think about it for the night, and put up
a wiki page tomorrow, put some notices on this on the big forums
(hopefully they will get ~5000 pageviews, put them in my
On 03.05.2010 21:47, Ben Laenen wrote:
Felix Hartmann wrote:
If in OSM we really want to get in more mountainbikers, we have to start
with unofficial routes. I will think about it for the night, and put up
a wiki page tomorrow, put some notices on this on the big forums
(hopefully they
Felix Hartmann wrote:
Sadly though many people in OSM are not able to leave their small
focussed mind and cannot espace their caged mind and try to use a
motorist perspective to do bicycle autorouting (e.g. CycleStreets
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/CycleStreets or
On Tue, 4 May 2010, Ben Laenen wrote:
Here's the thing: we just do not map unofficial routes. Only the ones that
are signposted. There are enough sites where you can submit your route
suggestions, and there's no reason why this should be in the OSM database.
-1
Am 03.05.2010 21:12, schrieb Felix Hartmann:
My actual position on this is, I will write a wiki page, with a note to
say bug off people against unofficial routes (because for mountainbiking
they will in a matter of days be largely more than signposted routes),
we will tag them
2010/5/3 Richard Mann richard.mann.westoxf...@googlemail.com:
I think routers would be better served if we identify good through
routes (ie the equivalent of highway=primary for motorists), and
record them as relations, perhaps
network=lcn+status=unofficial+signposted=no. But Andy's a strict
On 04.05.2010 01:41, Ulf Lamping wrote:
Am 03.05.2010 21:12, schrieb Felix Hartmann:
My actual position on this is, I will write a wiki page, with a note to
say bug off people against unofficial routes (because for mountainbiking
they will in a matter of days be largely more than
23 matches
Mail list logo
