2009/11/25 Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org
Hi,
Iván Sánchez Ortega wrote:
El Martes, 24 de Noviembre de 2009, Frederik Ramm escribió:
Maybe ~= 100km, but == 60 nm.
Am I the only one who has read that as 60 nanometers?
No, a certain Martin K. has already reported the same. I'd say
2009/11/23 Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net
Hi all,
I'm pleased to announce Potlatch 1.3 - a new version with one major
improvement.
Potlatch now lets you zoom in as far as zoom level 23. Previous
versions only went up to z19, and even then with some loss of
positional accuracy.
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 1:41 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/11/24 Anthony o...@inbox.org:
Nevermind. That's about half an inch, and it doesn't seem to be less
than a pixel (at my latitude/longitude, anyway). For some reason last
time i calculated it I thought it was
On 23 Nov 2009, at 16:58, Iván Sánchez Ortega wrote:
El Lunes, 23 de Noviembre de 2009, Richard Fairhurst escribió:
Potlatch now lets you zoom in as far as zoom level 23. Previous
versions only went up to z19, and even then with some loss of
positional accuracy.
I can already see the
On Wed, November 25, 2009 07:40, Peter Miller wrote:
On 23 Nov 2009, at 16:58, Iván Sánchez Ortega wrote:
El Lunes, 23 de Noviembre de 2009, Richard Fairhurst escribió:
Potlatch now lets you zoom in as far as zoom level 23. Previous
versions only went up to z19, and even then with some
El Martes, 24 de Noviembre de 2009, Frederik Ramm escribió:
Maybe ~= 100km, but == 60 nm.
Am I the only one who has read that as 60 nanometers?
--
--
Iván Sánchez Ortega i...@sanchezortega.es
http://ivan.sanchezortega.es
Proudly running Debian Linux with
I'm still reading it nanometers even after reading your email and after
spending 7 months in a flight simulator company!
2009/11/24 Iván Sánchez Ortega i...@sanchezortega.es
El Martes, 24 de Noviembre de 2009, Frederik Ramm escribió:
Maybe ~= 100km, but == 60 nm.
Am I the only one who has
Hi,
Iván Sánchez Ortega wrote:
El Martes, 24 de Noviembre de 2009, Frederik Ramm escribió:
Maybe ~= 100km, but == 60 nm.
Am I the only one who has read that as 60 nanometers?
No, a certain Martin K. has already reported the same. I'd say it
depends on context; nm is often, if sloppily,
Hi all,
I'm pleased to announce Potlatch 1.3 - a new version with one major
improvement.
Potlatch now lets you zoom in as far as zoom level 23. Previous
versions only went up to z19, and even then with some loss of
positional accuracy.
This makes Potlatch much more suitable for tracing
Richard Fairhurst wrote:
Hi all,
I'm pleased to announce Potlatch 1.3 - a new version with one major
improvement.
Potlatch now lets you zoom in as far as zoom level 23.
Excellent news. Thank you
Dave F.
___
talk mailing list
El Lunes, 23 de Noviembre de 2009, Richard Fairhurst escribió:
Potlatch now lets you zoom in as far as zoom level 23. Previous
versions only went up to z19, and even then with some loss of
positional accuracy.
I can already see the headlines of Potlatch 2.0:
Potlatch, now with more resolution
2009/11/23 Iván Sánchez Ortega i...@sanchezortega.es:
El Lunes, 23 de Noviembre de 2009, Richard Fairhurst escribió:
Potlatch now lets you zoom in as far as zoom level 23. Previous
versions only went up to z19, and even then with some loss of
positional accuracy.
I can already see the
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 12:37 AM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
2009/11/23 Iván Sánchez Ortega i...@sanchezortega.es:
El Lunes, 23 de Noviembre de 2009, Richard Fairhurst escribió:
Potlatch now lets you zoom in as far as zoom level 23. Previous
versions only went up to z19, and even then with
2009/11/24 Anthony o...@inbox.org:
Nevermind. That's about half an inch, and it doesn't seem to be less
than a pixel (at my latitude/longitude, anyway). For some reason last
time i calculated it I thought it was more.
You should use metric it's easier since metric distances were based on
a
Hi,
John Smith wrote:
You should use metric it's easier since metric distances were based on
a rough approximation of the circumference of the earth ;)
1 degree of latitude and at the equator, 1 degree of longitude ~=
100km
Maybe ~= 100km, but == 60 nm. One nautical mile is exactly one
2009/11/24 Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org:
Maybe ~= 100km, but == 60 nm. One nautical mile is exactly one minute of
Because they estimated the circumference to 36,000km, but it's over 40,000km
arc. Say again which system was naturally suited for all things geo?
1 nautical mile is exactly
2009/11/24 John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com:
1 nautical mile is exactly 1852m
Sorry, it was set to 1853m.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nautical_mile
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
17 matches
Mail list logo
