Am 10.03.2015 um 21:35 schrieb Stefan Keller:
> Hi,
>
> I have a problem with the usage values other yes in key building.
> It seems to me that this any other usage of building=yes (for area
> type) is almost purely redundant.
>
> When looking at taginfo [1], building has following three top mo
On 3/11/2015 6:37 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
nd common editor presets. In iD without "expert mode / all tags" the
only values for the building key are "yes" and "unknown" (which will not
set any key I believe), if other tags like amenity etc. are also set. No
way to enter free text then.
FWIW
2015-03-10 21:35 GMT+01:00 Stefan Keller :
> Then, when looking at the wiki page [2] it mostly points to
> alternative tags, like
> * building=apartment => tourism=apartment
>
the first is an apartment building, the latter a kind of accomodation
> * building=hotel => tourism=hotel
>
the fir
2015-03-10 21:48 GMT+01:00 Simon Poole :
> I suspect the numbers are strongly biased due to building outline imports.
>
+1 and common editor presets. In iD without "expert mode / all tags" the
only values for the building key are "yes" and "unknown" (which will not
set any key I believe), if ot
On 11/03/2015, Andreas Vilén wrote:
> I map buildings with the bulding_tools plugin and it would take
> considerably longer if I looked for a better tag for each building I map,
> and retag every tagged building=yes
The way I handle that is by tracing buildings by type. All houses
first, then all
On 10/03/2015, Stefan Keller wrote:
> Then, when looking at the wiki page [2] it mostly points to
> alternative tags, like
> * building=apartment => tourism=apartment
> * building=hotel => tourism=hotel
> * building=warehouse => shop=department_store (no indication to that
> in warehouse
> * build
I map buildings with the bulding_tools plugin and it would take
considerably longer if I looked for a better tag for each building I map,
and retag every tagged building=yes, so for that reason I almost never use
any other value. If you want to map towns of 20-50 000 inhabitants, or
larger rural ar
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 09:35:58PM +0100, Stefan Keller wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a problem with the usage values other yes in key building.
> It seems to me that this any other usage of building=yes (for area
> type) is almost purely redundant.
>
> When looking at taginfo [1], building has followi
Hi,
there was a discussion in the past about the difference.
building=church may be a building that looks like and perhaps was a
church once, but is e.g. a restaurant, disco or residential house now.
It may still be a church building, with a tower and a tower bell, high
curved windows and so on, w
Well I for one see hardly any usage of building=yes in my town
Kópavogur, in fact it has a usage of only 7,25% !
No imports were made so that could explain the low value of building=yes
apartments458
commercial85
construction2
garage771
garages168
house1025
indust
Hi,
I have a problem with the usage values other yes in key building.
It seems to me that this any other usage of building=yes (for area
type) is almost purely redundant.
When looking at taginfo [1], building has following three top most key usages:
yes 119260798 85%
house 11592812 8%
residentia
11 matches
Mail list logo
