Re: [OSM-talk] Relicensing timeline

2012-04-09 Thread Andrew
Elena ``of Valhalla'' gmail.com> writes: > We would like not to do that mostly for one reason: the streets > we want to map are in an area where gps reception isn't very good, > so we planned to use walking papers (or other printouts of current > OSM data). > > If the license switch hasn't ha

Re: [OSM-talk] Relicensing timeline

2012-04-07 Thread Elena ``of Valhalla''
On 2012-04-07 at 13:37:16 -0400, Richard Weait wrote: > On the other hand, perhaps > your mapping party does not need to be after the license switch? We would like not to do that mostly for one reason: the streets we want to map are in an area where gps reception isn't very good, so we planned

Re: [OSM-talk] Relicensing timeline

2012-04-07 Thread Richard Weait
On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Elena ``of Valhalla'' wrote: > Hello > > Are there any news on a date when we can expect that any data that > is going to be deleted is no longer in the database? The most-recent update is here: http://blog.osmfoundation.org/2012/04/05/license-change-update-getti

[OSM-talk] Relicensing timeline

2012-04-07 Thread Elena ``of Valhalla''
Hello Are there any news on a date when we can expect that any data that is going to be deleted is no longer in the database? In one of the town I map we're going to lose quite a number of pedestrian streets and we have decided to organize a mapping party to recreate them (and add missing POIs