Re: [OSM-talk] Routing across parks

2015-03-18 Thread JB
Le 18/03/2015 11:31, Janko Mihelić a écrit : I'm not aware of any routers that routes across areas. They do exist: http://moodwalkr.makina-corpus.net/ ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] Routing across parks

2015-03-18 Thread Mike N
Are there routers that do shortest-path routing across areas? I do not have an example of an area without additional roads ready. I'm not aware of any routers that routes across areas. There's some prior work in OpenTripPlanner - http://blog.openplans.org/2012/06/b-roll-david-solves-t

Re: [OSM-talk] Routing across parks

2015-03-18 Thread Volker Schmidt
OK, my answer should have been more clear: 1. we need a tag for the area: stay_on_path=yes|no 2. we want routers to cross parks with stay_on_path=no ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] Routing across parks

2015-03-18 Thread Dave F.
On 18/03/2015 10:31, Janko Mihelić wrote: 2015-03-18 11:25 GMT+01:00 Maarten Deen >: Are there routers that do shortest-path routing across areas? I do not have an example of an area without additional roads ready. I'm not aware of any routers that routes acros

Re: [OSM-talk] Routing across parks

2015-03-18 Thread Janko Mihelić
2015-03-18 11:25 GMT+01:00 Maarten Deen : > > Are there routers that do shortest-path routing across areas? I do not > have an example of an area without additional roads ready. > I'm not aware of any routers that routes across areas. ___ talk mailing l

Re: [OSM-talk] Routing across parks

2015-03-18 Thread Dave F.
On 10/03/2015 17:02, Mike N wrote: On 3/10/2015 12:56 PM, Volker Schmidt wrote: If I understand correctly that you want routing to cross a park as long as the way in and the way out are connected to the perimeter of the park. This is only correct in parks where you are free to walk anywhere. Mos

Re: [OSM-talk] Routing across parks

2015-03-18 Thread Maarten Deen
On 2015-03-10 17:56, Volker Schmidt wrote: Subject: [OSM-talk] Routing across parks For example let's use parks. Both of the foot routers won't cross the park unless there's a specific path way. However, as users can wander about anywhere they like there are no marked paths

Re: [OSM-talk] Routing across parks

2015-03-18 Thread Dave F.
On 10/03/2015 16:56, Volker Schmidt wrote: Subject: [OSM-talk] Routing across parks For example let's use parks. Both of the foot routers won't cross the park unless there's a specific path way. However, as users can wander about anywhere they like there are

Re: [OSM-talk] Routing across parks

2015-03-17 Thread Paul Johnson
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 12:35 PM, moltonel 3x Combo wrote: > On 10/03/2015, Mike N wrote: > > On 3/10/2015 12:56 PM, Volker Schmidt wrote: > >> If I understand correctly that you want routing to cross a park as long > >> as the way in and the way out are connected to the perimeter of the > >> pa

Re: [OSM-talk] Routing across parks

2015-03-12 Thread Janko Mihelić
2015-03-10 17:56 GMT+01:00 Volker Schmidt : > > To solve this, one needs possibly a new (?) tag for parks like > stay_on_path=yes|no > Maybe we need a general tag that says if an area can be traversed by foot in any direction. Would foot=yes be enough?

Re: [OSM-talk] Routing across parks

2015-03-11 Thread moltonel 3x Combo
On 10/03/2015, Mike N wrote: > On 3/10/2015 12:56 PM, Volker Schmidt wrote: >> If I understand correctly that you want routing to cross a park as long >> as the way in and the way out are connected to the perimeter of the >> park. This is only correct in parks where you are free to walk anywhere.

Re: [OSM-talk] Routing across parks

2015-03-10 Thread Mike N
On 3/10/2015 12:56 PM, Volker Schmidt wrote: If I understand correctly that you want routing to cross a park as long as the way in and the way out are connected to the perimeter of the park. This is only correct in parks where you are free to walk anywhere. Most parks in continental Europe do not

Re: [OSM-talk] Routing across parks

2015-03-10 Thread Volker Schmidt
> Subject: [OSM-talk] Routing across parks > > For example let's use parks. Both of the foot routers won't cross the > park unless there's a specific path way. However, as users can wander > about anywhere they like there are no marked paths, not even worn > gro

Re: [OSM-talk] Routing across parks

2015-03-10 Thread Dave F.
Ah, thanks. With the X I assumed that was closing the side panel, not just clearing the data. On 10/03/2015 12:57, Richard Fairhurst wrote: Dave F. wrote: On Richard F. cycle.travel routing. How do reset & start again? There's a "Close route" button at the top of the turn-by-turn directions

Re: [OSM-talk] Routing across parks

2015-03-10 Thread Richard Fairhurst
Dave F. wrote: > On Richard F. cycle.travel routing. How do reset & start again? There's a "Close route" button at the top of the turn-by-turn directions - click that and it'll clear the route. cheers Richard -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Routing-across-par

[OSM-talk] Routing across parks

2015-03-10 Thread Dave F.
Hi With the addition of routing to the man page there's been a few cases of adding ways in order to get routing to work. This is not the fault of the people editing, but the routing software. For example let's use parks. Both of the foot routers won't cross the park unless there's a specific