On 08/30/2010 10:41 AM, Graham Jones wrote:
I think we might need some finer grained assessment of c, because as
my son gets bigger (or I get older!) I am finding I give up on more
tracks than I used to...
Does anyone know if there is such a scheme in use already, or would we
need to invent a
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 2:53 PM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 2:40 AM, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote:
Then mark the reasons it's not suitable. We have this same discussion
with cycling (in fact, Peter Miller had an entire presentation on this
issue
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 3:10 PM, Craig Wallace craig...@fastmail.fm wrote:
On 30/08/2010 14:53, Steve Bennett wrote:
So you could end up mapping highway=path; bicycle=yes; width=1;
surface=dirt; in great detail, and totally miss the fact it's
unrideable.
Use mtb:scale and/or sac_scale, to
On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 2:40 AM, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote:
Then mark the reasons it's not suitable. We have this same discussion
with cycling (in fact, Peter Miller had an entire presentation on this
issue at SOTM09 - he just suggested the wrong solution :-) ). One
persons
On 30/08/2010 14:53, Steve Bennett wrote:
So you could end up mapping highway=path; bicycle=yes; width=1;
surface=dirt; in great detail, and totally miss the fact it's
unrideable.
Use mtb:scale and/or sac_scale, to tag how ridable/hikable it is.
Hi All,
I think the use of the existing tagging schemes for bicycle
suitability is the way to go - no point inventing another scheme.
One that I would like to use though is a scale for wheelchair accessibility.
I envisage a scheme along the lines of the mtb one where you could
have the range:
allow a
wheelchair user to realize I can reach point X on the trail, but will then
have to turn back.
---Original Email---
Subject :Re: [OSM-talk] Tagging Scheme Recommendations: highway=path,
footway,trail?
From :mailto:grahamjones...@googlemail.com
Date :Mon Aug 30 10:41:10 America
It's not detailled enough. A path is too narrow for a 4
wheels vehicle like a car but not for a 2 wheels vehicle
like a moped or a motorbike (or no
While that is often true, the criteria goes the other way:
- if the way is too narrow to fit a car (hey, my summer
car is only 1.48 m wide) or a
Snowmobiles (http://www.google.se/images?q=snowmobile) have a total
trackwith of about 1 m, so they are definitely narrower than cars.
Konrad
2010/8/26 M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com:
[...]
I don't know if snowmobiles are narrower than cars.
[...]
Pieren schrieb:
a 2 wheels vehicle like a moped or a motorbike (or no
wheels like a snowmobile ;-).
Who says that a snowmobile doesn't have wheels?
http://home.kairo.at/?d=gi=449m=ff.i=22196 (at the right - and yes,
Elvis was crazy for wanting to drive a snowmobile in Memphis) ;-)
Sorry, I
2010/8/27 Robert Kaiser ka...@kairo.at:
Who says that a snowmobile doesn't have wheels?
http://home.kairo.at/?d=gi=449m=ff.i=22196 (at the right - and yes,
yes, you can find all kind of weirdos, but generally they don't look like this.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:1951B12a.jpg
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 9:12 PM, John F. Eldredge j...@jfeldredge.com wrote:
Wouldn't that only be used on the section of the path that actually has the
steps, however? I am wondering how (or if) you would tag the entire path to
indicate that you can, legally, use a bicycle or motorcycle on
Maarten Deen wrote:
As highway=path means no motorized traffic, it might be a footpath or
cyclepath or bridleway (or others). That's the more specific part.
highway=path doesn't mean no motorized traffic, if means no wide vehicles.
So no cars, but mopeds are still allowed.
Greetings
Ben
On Thu, 26 Aug 2010 12:28:53 +0200, Ben Laenen benlae...@gmail.com
wrote:
Maarten Deen wrote:
As highway=path means no motorized traffic, it might be a footpath or
cyclepath or bridleway (or others). That's the more specific part.
highway=path doesn't mean no motorized traffic, if means no
On Thursday 26 August 2010 12:34:26 Maarten Deen wrote:
That is not how it is described in the wiki:
Then the wiki is wrong.
In the initial discussions about the path tag, one of the things that kept
cropping up was: snowmobile trail. Snowmobiles are definitely motorised.
--
m.v.g.,
Cartinus
n Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Cartinus carti...@xs4all.nl wrote:
On Thursday 26 August 2010 12:34:26 Maarten Deen wrote:
That is not how it is described in the wiki:
Then the wiki is wrong.
It's not detailled enough. A path is too narrow for a 4 wheels vehicle like
a car but not for a 2
reserved for
cases where there is a sign stating that restriction.
---Original Email---
Subject :Re: [OSM-talk] Tagging Scheme Recommendations: highway=path,
footway,trail?
From :mailto:pier...@gmail.com
Date :Thu Aug 26 08:07:18 America/Chicago 2010
n Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 1:12 PM
2010/8/26 John F. Eldredge j...@jfeldredge.com:
What additional tag would one use to state that a particular path is not
advisable for vehicular use (for instance, because it contains steps at one
or more points), but doesn't have a sign forbidding vehicular use?
this is not to solve by
2010/8/26 Pieren pier...@gmail.com:
n Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Cartinus carti...@xs4all.nl wrote:
On Thursday 26 August 2010 12:34:26 Maarten Deen wrote:
That is not how it is described in the wiki:
Then the wiki is wrong.
I agree with Cartinus here: the wiki is wrong. Path is not
to tag a path in
such a manner would be if it had stepping-stones across a stream, rather than a
bridge.
---Original Email---
Subject :Re: [OSM-talk] Tagging Scheme Recommendations: highway=path, footway,
trail?
From :mailto:dieterdre...@gmail.com
Date :Thu Aug 26 14:59:01 America
2010/8/26 John F. Eldredge j...@jfeldredge.com:
Wouldn't that only be used on the section of the path that actually has the
steps, however?
yes, of course. And dependant where (how far) you want to go, it might
also be suitable to take the path.
I am wondering how (or if) you would tag the
I've been looking at a lot of hiking trails on OSM in the Cascade Mountains
near Seattle. I've noticed a few different tags in regard to trail GPS
traces (highway=path,highway=footway,highway=trail,highway=footpath). The
wiki page on US roads tagging recommendations only has the following
advice
: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 4:30 PM
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [OSM-talk] Tagging Scheme Recommendations: highway=path, footway,trail?
I've been looking at a lot of hiking trails on OSM in the Cascade Mountains
near Seattle. I've noticed a few different tags in regard to trail GPS traces
On Wed, 25 Aug 2010 13:30:18 -0700, Greg Corradini
gregcorrad...@gmail.com wrote:
I've been looking at a lot of hiking trails on OSM in the Cascade
Mountains near Seattle. I've noticed a few different tags in regard to
trail GPS traces
24 matches
Mail list logo
