2011/2/16 Elizabeth Dodd ed...@billiau.net:
On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 20:56:54 -0500
Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
Since giving long ground-level ways nonzero layers screws up every
place they cross another way, it seems clear what should be done.
-1 is used for rivers commonly over
On Tue, 15 Feb 2011 20:56:54 -0500
Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
Since giving long ground-level ways nonzero layers screws up every
place they cross another way, it seems clear what should be done.
-1 is used for rivers commonly over long distances where traced and no
idea where
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 12:12:34AM +0100, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2011/2/14 Andrew Guertin andrew.guer...@uvm.edu:
Second, an underground building. Connects to other buildings that are at
ground level and have basements.
layer=-1 for the underground building. You could maybe also try
2011/2/15 Jacek Konieczny jaj...@jajcus.net:
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 12:12:34AM +0100, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2011/2/14 Andrew Guertin andrew.guer...@uvm.edu:
Second, an underground building. Connects to other buildings that are at
ground level and have basements.
layer=-1 for the
Jacek Konieczny wrote:
layer=-1 tells only that the thing is under layer=0 and over layer=-2,
nothing in relation to 'ground level' (some rivers or roads may have
layer=-1 or layer=1 on most of its length).
No, ground level is layer 0. A nonzero layer on a ground-level feature is an
2011/2/15 Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com:
Jacek Konieczny wrote:
layer=-1 tells only that the thing is under layer=0 and over layer=-2,
nothing in relation to 'ground level' (some rivers or roads may have
layer=-1 or layer=1 on most of its length).
No, ground level is layer 0. A nonzero
On 15 February 2011 23:11, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
Jacek Konieczny wrote:
layer=-1 tells only that the thing is under layer=0 and over layer=-2,
nothing in relation to 'ground level' (some rivers or roads may have
layer=-1 or layer=1 on most of its length).
No, ground
On 2/15/2011 5:38 PM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2011/2/15 Nathan Edgars IInerou...@gmail.com:
Jacek Konieczny wrote:
layer=-1 tells only that the thing is under layer=0 and over layer=-2,
nothing in relation to 'ground level' (some rivers or roads may have
layer=-1 or layer=1 on most of its
2011/2/16 Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com:
-1,
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Layer
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:layer
our wiki is becoming something like the bible: you can find a page for
every opinion ;-)
I don't have a big problem with layer=0 being considered ground
On 2/15/2011 7:52 PM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2011/2/16 Nathan Edgars IInerou...@gmail.com:
-1,
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Layer
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:layer
our wiki is becoming something like the bible: you can find a page for
every opinion ;-)
I don't have a
On Wed, 2011-02-16 at 01:52 +0100, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2011/2/16 Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com:
-1,
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Layer
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:layer
our wiki is becoming something like the bible: you can find a page for
every opinion ;-)
David Murn wrote:
Well, the page seems to contradict itself, suggesting that a tunnel
under a building is layer=0.
Depends if the tunnel goes underground or just through a building while
remaining at ground level (though the latter case might be better described
as covered).
David Murn
I have a few buildings that are not simply at ground level, and I can't
find how to map them on the wiki.
First off, a skywalk between two buildings. Nothing fancy, although it
does go over a road.
Second, an underground building. Connects to other buildings that are at
ground level and have
On 15 February 2011 10:26, Andrew Guertin andrew.guer...@uvm.edu wrote:
I have a few buildings that are not simply at ground level, and I can't
find how to map them on the wiki.
First off, a skywalk between two buildings. Nothing fancy, although it
does go over a road.
building=yes
Hi,
On 14 February 2011 22:37, Robin Paulson robin.paul...@gmail.com wrote:
On 15 February 2011 10:26, Andrew Guertin andrew.guer...@uvm.edu wrote:
I have a few buildings that are not simply at ground level, and I can't
find how to map them on the wiki.
First off, a skywalk between two
On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 16:26 -0500, Andrew Guertin wrote:
I have a few buildings that are not simply at ground level, and I can't
find how to map them on the wiki.
First off, a skywalk between two buildings. Nothing fancy, although it
does go over a road.
As said before, use
Hi Andrew,
I'm not that sure but there seem to be a building:levels:aboveground
besides the building:levels tag. So levels-aboveground=levels below ground?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM-3D#Buildings
Currently we put all 3D experts together to make a better roadmap on
what and how to
2011/2/14 Andrew Guertin andrew.guer...@uvm.edu:
Second, an underground building. Connects to other buildings that are at
ground level and have basements.
layer=-1 for the underground building. You could maybe also try covered=yes
Third, a building with a courtyard, and a basement that also
18 matches
Mail list logo
