2011/2/15 Jacek Konieczny <[email protected]>: > On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 12:12:34AM +0100, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote: >> 2011/2/14 Andrew Guertin <[email protected]>: >> > Second, an underground building. Connects to other buildings that are at >> > ground level and have basements. >> layer=-1 for the underground building. You could maybe also try covered=yes > > layer=-1 tells only that the thing is under layer=0 and over layer=-2, > nothing in relation to 'ground level'
I wasn't referring to "ground level" but to the other buildings that are above and to the earth / ways / landuse / natural features / landcover that are probably above. > (some rivers or roads may have > layer=-1 or layer=1 on most of its length). In our data yes. In reality besides tunnels you would hardly find this (assuming that it is easier to understand for mappers to set layer=1 for objects above then "default" layer=-1 for stuff that "might" cross underneath other objects. > For underground roads and waterways 'tunnel=yes' works well. Would it be > applicable to buildings? consider tunnel=culvert for underground waterways (depending on the situation) > And in some cases I guess a footway or other tunnel may be a good > representation of the underground connection of buildings. +1 cheers, Martin _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
