Re: [OSM-talk] mapping driveways

2009-03-12 Thread Ted Mielczarek
On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 10:20 PM, Ulf Lamping wrote: > First of all, you should NEVER remove anything from the database, unless > you have made certain by your own eye that the object in question is an > error and not existing in reality! Even than take care not to remove > anything marked as aban

Re: [OSM-talk] mapping driveways

2009-01-26 Thread Ed Loach
> This is only what I do - it may be wrong as I am relatively new > here - so tell me, please, and I will amend my wicked ways! I've not been tempted to add nodes for trees yet, though there is a sign on a lamppost near here regarding tree preservation orders where specifically numbered trees ar

Re: [OSM-talk] mapping driveways

2009-01-26 Thread Mike Harris
o:ulf.lamp...@googlemail.com] Sent: 25 January 2009 15:19 To: Greg Troxel Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] mapping driveways Greg Troxel schrieb: > First of all, you should NEVER remove anything from the database, > unless you have made certain by your own eye that the object in &g

Re: [OSM-talk] mapping driveways

2009-01-26 Thread Mike Harris
tell me, please, and I will amend my wicked ways! Mike Harris -Original Message- From: Matthias Julius [mailto:li...@julius-net.net] Sent: 25 January 2009 04:44 To: talk@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] mapping driveways Ulf Lamping writes: > First of all, you shoul

Re: [OSM-talk] mapping driveways

2009-01-25 Thread Russ Nelson
On Jan 25, 2009, at 8:25 AM, Greg Troxel wrote: > Perhaps the wiki should have some sort of "what should be on the map" > section that explains this point more. The consensus seems to be "Everything that's nailed down and a few things that aren't", but I may be wrong, and am happy to be correct

Re: [OSM-talk] mapping driveways

2009-01-25 Thread Ulf Lamping
Greg Troxel schrieb: > First of all, you should NEVER remove anything from the database, > unless you have made certain by your own eye that the object in > question is an error and not existing in reality! Even than take care > not to remove anything marked as abandoned or alike, that mark

Re: [OSM-talk] mapping driveways

2009-01-25 Thread Greg Troxel
First of all, you should NEVER remove anything from the database, unless you have made certain by your own eye that the object in question is an error and not existing in reality! Even than take care not to remove anything marked as abandoned or alike, that marks this object was once her

Re: [OSM-talk] mapping driveways

2009-01-25 Thread Lars Aronsson
Greg Troxel wrote: > So my real question boils down to: when there is an area perhaps > 100m long and 3m wide paved to get to a single house, should > that be represented, and how? How do we do this so it's clearly > rendered differently than a proper road. To me, that is a service road (high

Re: [OSM-talk] mapping driveways

2009-01-24 Thread Matthias Julius
Ulf Lamping writes: > First of all, you should NEVER remove anything from the database, unless > you have made certain by your own eye that the object in question is an > error and not existing in reality! Even than take care not to remove > anything marked as abandoned or alike, that marks th

Re: [OSM-talk] mapping driveways

2009-01-24 Thread Ulf Lamping
Greg Troxel schrieb: > Sorry if this is on the wiki - I've tried to read the relevant parts. > > I live in a semi-rural area where there are a lot of long driveways. > Some of these show up on the map, mostly due to MassGIS bulk imports. > > For commercial places, and other places where the publi

[OSM-talk] mapping driveways

2009-01-24 Thread Greg Troxel
Sorry if this is on the wiki - I've tried to read the relevant parts. I live in a semi-rural area where there are a lot of long driveways. Some of these show up on the map, mostly due to MassGIS bulk imports. For commercial places, and other places where the public might go, I've set a few to th