Peter Childs schrieb:
> 2009/8/28 :
>
>>> On 27/08/09 12:13, Jack Stringer wrote:
>>>
>>>
lock=yes
lock_name=Withrington Bottom Lock
>>> When you are tagging a way, you can't use name= because that will
>>> already contain the name of the canal. Hence lock_name=.
On 28/08/09 13:07, wynnd...@lavabit.com wrote:
>> On 27/08/09 12:13, Jack Stringer wrote:
>>
>>> lock=yes
>>> lock_name=Withrington Bottom Lock
>>
>> When you are tagging a way, you can't use name= because that will
>> already contain the name of the canal. Hence lock_name=.
>>
> Why would you want
gt; To: talk@openstreetmap.org
> Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] waterway=lock
>
> > On 27/08/09 12:13, Jack Stringer wrote:
> >
> >> lock=yes
> >> lock_name=Withrington Bottom Lock
> >
> > When you are tagging a way, you can't use name= because that will
>
map.org
> Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] waterway=lock
>
> On 27/08/09 14:27, Mike Harris wrote:
> > On a related canal issue, I have a problem with deciding
> how to tag a
> > canal bridge as a segment of a way. The way will often already have
> > name= and ref= tags as
Peter Childs wrote:
> I have no knowledge of Canals and shipping, so maybe we need an
> expert on how to map waterways properly.
Yeah, maybe we could ask the editor of the biggest-selling waterway
magazine, established since 1972 and which publishes a series of detailed
pull-out waterway maps ev
2009/8/28 Richard Fairhurst :
>
> Peter Childs wrote:
>> The Canal way will need to be split at the lock gates, (or in
>> some cases where a diversion starts (due to some rivers
>> going over weirs) while there is a lock for boats.
>
> (UK-specific tagging stuff follows)
>
> Ideally I'd like to dis
Peter Childs wrote:
> The Canal way will need to be split at the lock gates, (or in
> some cases where a diversion starts (due to some rivers
> going over weirs) while there is a lock for boats.
(UK-specific tagging stuff follows)
Ideally I'd like to discourage people from using a (non-closed
2009/8/28 :
>> On 27/08/09 12:13, Jack Stringer wrote:
>>
>>> lock=yes
>>> lock_name=Withrington Bottom Lock
>>
>> When you are tagging a way, you can't use name= because that will
>> already contain the name of the canal. Hence lock_name=.
>>
> Why would you want to repeat the name of a canal on
> On 27/08/09 12:13, Jack Stringer wrote:
>
>> lock=yes
>> lock_name=Withrington Bottom Lock
>
> When you are tagging a way, you can't use name= because that will
> already contain the name of the canal. Hence lock_name=.
>
Why would you want to repeat the name of a canal on its individual nodes?
I
On 27/08/09 14:27, Mike Harris wrote:
> On a related canal issue, I have a problem with deciding how to tag a canal
> bridge as a segment of a way. The way will often already have name= and ref=
> tags as a highway; but I want to add a name= and ref= tag for the canal
> bridge. Not keen on name_1 o
On 27/08/09 12:13, Jack Stringer wrote:
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Dlock_gate
> Shows to tag both ends of the lock. If there is a name just to use name.
This was the original tag. However, it has various problems - for
example, it makes it hard to render a lock as a single
ap
> Subject: [OSM-talk] waterway=lock
>
> Just looking at Keepright and I can see loads of waterway=lock
>
> What is the preferred way to record the information?
>
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Dlock_gate
> Shows to tag both ends of the lock. If
2009/8/27 Jack Stringer :
> Just looking at Keepright and I can see loads of waterway=lock
>
> What is the preferred way to record the information?
>
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Dlock_gate
> Shows to tag both ends of the lock. If there is a name just to use name.
>
> http://w
Just looking at Keepright and I can see loads of waterway=lock
What is the preferred way to record the information?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Dlock_gate
Shows to tag both ends of the lock. If there is a name just to use name.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:lock
Say
14 matches
Mail list logo
