On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 1:38 AM, Marc Gemis wrote:
> ok, multiple from in a relation will solve this.
> Isn't it a problem that some "from"s do not end in some "intersection"s ?
Perhaps 3 intersection roles, with the single carriageway segment between
the dual carriageways being the third inter
ok, multiple from in a relation will solve this.
Isn't it a problem that some "from"s do not end in some "intersection"s ?
On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 8:31 AM, Paul Johnson wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 1:28 AM, Marc Gemis wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 8:20 AM, Paul Johnson wrote:
>>
On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 1:28 AM, Marc Gemis wrote:
> On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 8:20 AM, Paul Johnson wrote:
> >
> >> to: the collection of ways one can travel to after stopping/giving
> >> way/waiting for traffic signal. This would include the from way so
> >> u-turns have to obey the sign/signal
On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 8:20 AM, Paul Johnson wrote:
>
>> to: the collection of ways one can travel to after stopping/giving
>> way/waiting for traffic signal. This would include the from way so
>> u-turns have to obey the sign/signal as well.
>
>
> Yes. At a minimum, a stop, give_way, traffic_si
On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 12:57 AM, Marc Gemis wrote:
> So would a stop sign / give way sign /traffic signal then be mapped as
>
> stop_position: node where on the street does one have to stop/give
> way/wait for traffic signal
>
My thinking on this is stop_position isn't necessary as, unlike publ
So would a stop sign / give way sign /traffic signal then be mapped as
stop_position: node where on the street does one have to stop/give
way/wait for traffic signal
sign : node (optional) the exact location of the sign
from: the way one is following to which the action has to be applied
(is this
On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 10:28 AM, Jean-Marc Liotier wrote:
> On Sun, 7 May 2017 01:57:54 -0500
> Paul Johnson wrote:
>
> > I think it's time that we seriously reconsider how stop signs, yield
> > signs and traffic calming devices are handled in all but the most
> > simple (all approaches to the
On Sun, 7 May 2017 01:57:54 -0500
Paul Johnson wrote:
> I think it's time that we seriously reconsider how stop signs, yield
> signs and traffic calming devices are handled in all but the most
> simple (all approaches to the affected node apply) cases. [..] I'm
> thinking it's time to start mappi
2017-05-07 9:30 GMT+02:00 Paul Johnson :
> On Sun, May 7, 2017 at 2:25 AM, Jo wrote:
>
>> What about a type=traffic_sign relation?
>>
>> Where traffic_sign could be stop, give_way, parking
>>
>
> I was thinking the typical highway=* tags for highway=stop,
> highway=traffic_signals and highway=giv
On Sun, May 7, 2017 at 2:25 AM, Jo wrote:
> What about a type=traffic_sign relation?
>
> Where traffic_sign could be stop, give_way, parking
>
I was thinking the typical highway=* tags for highway=stop,
highway=traffic_signals and highway=give_way.
> In case of a stop sign, we could include th
What about a type=traffic_sign relation?
Where traffic_sign could be stop, give_way, parking.
We can put a traffic_sign tag on nodes, where they get the
country_code:specific_national_code like BE:C1. Several traffic signs can
have an effect on several ways and nodes of the road network, so we co
On Sun, May 7, 2017 at 2:12 AM, Nicolás Alvarez
wrote:
>
> Do you know of a case where you would have a traffic calming device
> only affecting one direction, but not already have a reason to map
> each road direction as a separate way?
>
Somewhat commonly. Oklahoma and Texas have a strong tende
2017-05-07 3:57 GMT-03:00 Paul Johnson :
> I think it's time that we seriously reconsider how stop signs, yield signs
> and traffic calming devices are handled in all but the most simple (all
> approaches to the affected node apply) cases. This largely after having a
> protracted discussion with o
13 matches
Mail list logo