Am 22.04.2015 um 19:12 schrieb EthnicFood IsGreat:
Thanks to everyone who contributed on this subject. I think I've got a
better understanding now of tagging buildings vs. tagging amenities. And
sorry if I should've posted to the tagging list instead. There are so many
lists. I think I'm
If you use a relation shouldn't it be a site relation instead of a
multipolygon?
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 4:24 PM Bryan Housel br...@7thposition.com wrote:
`amenity=hospital` is what makes it a proper hospital. You can create a
node where the hospital is, or an area around the property of the
Mark,
You're correct- there's no set standard here. OSM uses folksonomies
which overlap and change over time.
Specifically the question of tagging amenties or shops as buildings or
nodes is one where we as a community don't have complete consensus.
The general feeling in the US from my
`amenity=hospital` is what makes it a proper hospital. You can create a node
where the hospital is, or an area around the property of the hospital. Drawing
either a node or an area is ok, but drawing areas is preferred if you have time
for it.
If the hospital is just one building, you can
Hey
While this email would rather suit tagging@ or help.openstreetmap.org I
gonna try to answer:
First of all, please, do not mix building-use and building=*. The later
is for the construction type which might overlap with the actual use.
amenity=hospital is the tag for a hospital and needed to
On 21 April 2015 at 16:21, Jan van Bekkum jan.vanbek...@gmail.com wrote:
If you use a relation shouldn't it be a site relation instead of a
multipolygon?
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 4:24 PM Bryan Housel br...@7thposition.com
wrote:
`amenity=hospital` is what makes it a proper hospital. You
Am 21.04.2015 um 17:31 schrieb pmailkeey . pmailk...@googlemail.com:
No area should be plotted as a point. That's just one of OSM's nightmarish
disasters.
+1, basically you would tag buildings with the building tag, and either the
building type or yes as value, while functions are
7 matches
Mail list logo