Re: [OSM-talk] Taginfo challenge

On 16/03/2015 00:16, Rob Nickerson wrote: Not necessarily as fixing the tag could also result in the data being rendered therefore making it more visible for people to come in and fix (if a local community of OSMers exists). Other non-destructive actions might me to include key capitalisations

Re: [OSM-talk] Collecting various road situations

On 14-03-15 17:38, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:> Thanks for examples! I am still looking for well mapped area with many > pedestrian roads, living streets, > footways, cycleways... Something like this? --- m.v.g., Cartinus ___

Re: [OSM-talk] Collecting various road situations

Thanks, that would work well! 2015-03-16 10:46 GMT+01:00 Cartinus : > On 14-03-15 17:38, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:> Thanks for examples! I am > still looking for well mapped area with many > > pedestrian roads, living streets, > > footways, cycleways... > > Something like this? > >

[OSM-talk] SafeThru spam via PN

Hi, I have received spam via PN (for the first time ever) by user "SafeThru". He/She sent the same text a few hours before to b...@openstreetmap.de, the email address of the team of German Wochennotiz (Weekly). SafeThru is promoting a strange non-free, proprietary Android app called "SafeThru" an

Re: [OSM-talk] Taginfo challenge

I've found a dozen really incompetent imports by following up on oddities in Taginfo. Simply fixing the tags would do nothing but mask the bad data. It would allow me to actually find the stuff that really wrong. As it stands now I'm not going to waste my time fixing 200 capital language spel

Re: [OSM-talk] Taginfo challenge

Hi, On 03/16/2015 08:54 PM, Andreas Goss wrote: >> I've found a dozen really incompetent imports by following up on >> oddities in Taginfo. Simply fixing the tags would do nothing >> but mask the bad data. > > It would allow me to actually find the stuff that really wrong. As it > stands now I'm

[OSM-talk] Geofabrik routing validator.

Hello everyone, The wiki does not explain 'islands', although a tooltip on the geofabrik webpage explains that it indicates "groups of ways not reachable". In this tiny area there are some hiking trails and sections of track that clearly *are* reachable, but are marked in purple as an error. htt

Re: [OSM-talk] Geofabrik routing validator.

On 3/16/2015 11:33 PM, Andrew Errington wrote: What is the problem? Is it a data problem or a mistake in the error detector? It could be the access=yes tag (which means access is permitted, although it's redundant). Access=yes for what modes? I'd be surprised if it included motor_vehicle, whi