[OSM-talk] Wrong scale in slippy map

2009-04-22 Thread Lars Aronsson
Looking at the area where I live, http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=58.407&lon=15.600&zoom=18&layers=B000FTF these buildings are 11 metres wide and not 22 metres as the scale indicates. The difference is explained by the latitude 58.4 degrees and cosine(60°) = 0.5. Maybe one year back, I repo

Re: [OSM-talk] more changeset question

2009-04-22 Thread Brett Henderson
Andy Allan wrote: 2009/4/22 Iván Sánchez Ortega : El Miércoles, 22 de Abril de 2009, maning sambale escribió: Thanks! seems reasonable for my regular editing session. What about bulk imports? There is one script to bulk-upload stuff in SVN (apps/utils/import/bulk_upload_06). It

Re: [OSM-talk] mapnik weekly rendering after API 0.6

2009-04-22 Thread Jon Burgess
On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 14:16 +, Joe Richards wrote: > Is the weekly Mapnik rendering process still running after the upgrade to API > 0.6? If so, which day is it scheduled for? It will still occurs on Wednesdays. I have started off the import this evening so it should begin rendering the late

Re: [OSM-talk] Any chance of getting RSS/Atom feeds for those changeset/history pages?

2009-04-22 Thread Iván Sánchez Ortega
El Miércoles, 22 de Abril de 2009, Frederik Ramm escribió: > This does not rule out the application of a convex hull but [...] > It is going to be expensive, and it is not going to avoid false positives > altogether, just reduce them... My point is that we could reach a compromise between no fal

Re: [OSM-talk] Any chance of getting RSS/Atom feeds for those changeset/history pages?

2009-04-22 Thread andrzej zaborowski
2009/4/22 Iván Sánchez Ortega : > El Miércoles, 22 de Abril de 2009, Frederik Ramm escribió: >> A proper monitoring function has to use the changeset bbox as an index >> only and then check whether the changeset *really* contains something in >> the area of interest to the subscriber. This is more

Re: [OSM-talk] Any chance of getting RSS/Atom feeds for those changeset/history pages?

2009-04-22 Thread Shaun McDonald
On 22 Apr 2009, at 21:08, Iván Sánchez Ortega wrote: > El Miércoles, 22 de Abril de 2009, Frederik Ramm escribió: >> A proper monitoring function has to use the changeset bbox as an >> index >> only and then check whether the changeset *really* contains >> something in >> the area of interest

Re: [OSM-talk] Any chance of getting RSS/Atom feeds for those changeset/history pages?

2009-04-22 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hi, Iván Sánchez Ortega wrote: > Maybe we could calculate the convex hull of the changeset and use that with > some postgis magic. It should be quicker than comparing all the elements in > the changeset to the bbox, and would not produce so many false positives. A considerable amount of brain p

Re: [OSM-talk] Any chance of getting RSS/Atom feeds for tho se changeset/history pages?

2009-04-22 Thread Iván Sánchez Ortega
El Miércoles, 22 de Abril de 2009, Frederik Ramm escribió: > A proper monitoring function has to use the changeset bbox as an index > only and then check whether the changeset *really* contains something in > the area of interest to the subscriber. This is more expensive in terms > of CPU power and

Re: [OSM-talk] Ruby Error while adding user as friend?

2009-04-22 Thread Thomas Wood
This has now been fixed. 2009/4/21 Ciprian Talaba : > Hi, > > I am getting a Ruby error when I am trying to add some user as my friend. It > seems to be related to some username (for now I can only notice this error > if the username contains a space). The error is below: > > The OpenStreetMap ser

[OSM-talk] (no subject)

2009-04-22 Thread Habib Habib
metni...@gmail.com ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

[OSM-talk] Africa Road data import

2009-04-22 Thread Robert Soden
Hello, I wrote a little while back that we would be working on some data imports for Africa. In short, we received permission from 2 different UN data repo's to contribute their base road, river, rail, and admin boundary data to OSM. So far, we have cleaned and imported 6 countries worth

Re: [OSM-talk] [OSM-talk-be] IMPORTANT - OSM API upgrade - Upgrade finished

2009-04-22 Thread Richard Fairhurst
I wrote: > We think we've found the issue. More in half an hour, hopefully. Fixed (hopefully) and committed. Will be live later when Tom has a chance to deploy it. For those interested, the database was changed in 0.6 to store relation members as 'Way', 'Node' or 'Relation'. Previously they were

Re: [OSM-talk] Any chance of getting RSS/Atom feeds for those changeset/history pages?

2009-04-22 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hi, Eugene Alvin Villar wrote: > Getting RSS/Atom feeds for these seems to be the logical next step. (I > prefer Atom 1.0 + GeoRSS extension instead of RSS 2.0, by the way.) I assume > that it'd be *extremely* easy to do this: just reformat the current > changeset list page's output. Yes, but as

[OSM-talk] SOTM Working Committee Update

2009-04-22 Thread Nick Black
The latest minutes from the SOTM organizing committee are here: http://docs.google.com/View?docid=dhdfbm9s_6cpp565d9 They include the announcement regarding the winning SOTM logo. -- Nick Black twitter.com/nick_b ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreet

Re: [OSM-talk] 404 error in History tab

2009-04-22 Thread Thomas Wood
Fixed in http://trac.openstreetmap.org/changeset/14694 Thanks for the report. 2009/4/22 Ed Avis : > I went to the Export tab on the main OSM site, then History, but that gave URI > ?bbox=-0.13434%2C51.52728%2C-0.11829%2C51.53819> > which is 404. > >

Re: [OSM-talk] [OSM-talk-be] IMPORTANT - OSM API upgrade - Upgrade finished

2009-04-22 Thread Richard Fairhurst
Ben Laenen wrote: > Little warning though: relations are completely broken with Potlatch. We think we've found the issue. More in half an hour, hopefully. cheers Richard -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A--OSM-talk-be--IMPORTANT---OSM-API-upgrade---Upgrade-finished-tp

Re: [OSM-talk] more changeset question

2009-04-22 Thread Andy Allan
2009/4/22 Iván Sánchez Ortega : > El Miércoles, 22 de Abril de 2009, maning sambale escribió: >> Thanks! seems reasonable for my regular editing session.  What about >> bulk imports? > > There is one script to bulk-upload stuff in SVN > (apps/utils/import/bulk_upload_06). It does split big files in

Re: [OSM-talk] Any chance of getting RSS/Atom feeds for those changeset/history pages?

2009-04-22 Thread Andy Allan
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Eugene Alvin Villar wrote: > Getting RSS/Atom feeds for these seems to be the logical next step. (I > prefer Atom 1.0 + GeoRSS extension instead of RSS 2.0, by the way.) I assume > that it'd be *extremely* easy to do this: just reformat the current > changeset list

Re: [OSM-talk] [josm-dev] Commit message not empty

2009-04-22 Thread Shaun McDonald
On 22 Apr 2009, at 15:45, Ed Loach wrote: >> more people (I speculate) are >> leaving >> their Potlatch comments empty. > > Perhaps I should RTFM (or RTFW), but I couldn't see anywhere obvious > to put a comment (and doing a quick wiki search am no clearer). > Checking my post-upgrade edits you c

[OSM-talk] Any chance of getting RSS/Atom feeds for those changeset/history pages?

2009-04-22 Thread Eugene Alvin Villar
Getting RSS/Atom feeds for these seems to be the logical next step. (I prefer Atom 1.0 + GeoRSS extension instead of RSS 2.0, by the way.) I assume that it'd be *extremely* easy to do this: just reformat the current changeset list page's output. I imagine the URLs would be like the following: Glo

Re: [OSM-talk] [josm-dev] Commit message not empty

2009-04-22 Thread Andy Allan
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 3:45 PM, Ed Loach wrote: >> more people (I speculate) are >> leaving >> their Potlatch comments empty. > > Perhaps I should RTFM (or RTFW), but I couldn't see anywhere obvious > to put a comment (and doing a quick wiki search am no clearer). > Checking my post-upgrade edits

Re: [OSM-talk] [OSM-talk-be] IMPORTANT - OSM API upgrade - Upgrade finished

2009-04-22 Thread Andy Allan
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Maarten Deen wrote: > Ben Laenen wrote: >> >> The server is now back into a usable state, if you want to start mapping >> again. >> >> Little warning though: relations are completely broken with Potlatch. >> Don't do anything with relations in there until it's fix

Re: [OSM-talk] [josm-dev] Commit message not empty

2009-04-22 Thread Ed Loach
> more people (I speculate) are > leaving > their Potlatch comments empty. Perhaps I should RTFM (or RTFW), but I couldn't see anywhere obvious to put a comment (and doing a quick wiki search am no clearer). Checking my post-upgrade edits you can tell the three I did with JOSM and the one I did

[OSM-talk] 404 error in History tab

2009-04-22 Thread Ed Avis
I went to the Export tab on the main OSM site, then History, but that gave URI which is 404. -- Ed Avis ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http:/

[OSM-talk] Setting comment on existing changeset

2009-04-22 Thread Ed Avis
Could the web interface allow changing the comment on an already-uploaded changeset? Similar to how version control systems like Subversion allow you to set the log message on an old commit, even though the commit itself is unchangeable. Ideally we'd all type in the changeset message when uploadi

Re: [OSM-talk] [josm-dev] Commit message not empty

2009-04-22 Thread Russ Nelson
On Apr 22, 2009, at 10:02 AM, Pieren wrote: > On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Frederik Ramm >> I can only hope that such childish protest behaviour is not the >> norm in OSM. >> > > It makes me angry because you and one or two other guys refuse to > understand that you cannot force people writ

Re: [OSM-talk] [josm-dev] Commit message not empty

2009-04-22 Thread David Earl
On 22/04/2009 15:02, Pieren wrote: > On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Frederik Ramm >> I can only hope that such childish protest behaviour is not the norm in OSM. >> > > It makes me angry because you and one or two other guys refuse to > understand that you cannot force people writing meaningful

[OSM-talk] mapnik weekly rendering after API 0.6

2009-04-22 Thread Joe Richards
Is the weekly Mapnik rendering process still running after the upgrade to API 0.6? If so, which day is it scheduled for? ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] [josm-dev] Commit message not empty

2009-04-22 Thread Pieren
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Frederik Ramm > I can only hope that such childish protest behaviour is not the norm in OSM. > It makes me angry because you and one or two other guys refuse to understand that you cannot force people writing meaningful comments in their commits and this will imply

Re: [OSM-talk] [OSM-talk-be] IMPORTANT - OSM API upgrade - Upgradefinished

2009-04-22 Thread Gregory Williams
> -Original Message- > From: talk-boun...@openstreetmap.org [mailto:talk- > boun...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of Maarten Deen > Sent: 22 April 2009 12:19 > To: talk...@openstreetmap.org > Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org > Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] [OSM-talk-be] IMPORTANT - OSM API upgrade - > U

Re: [OSM-talk] [OSM-talk-be] IMPORTANT - OSM API upgrade - Upgrade finished

2009-04-22 Thread Maarten Deen
Ben Laenen wrote: > > The server is now back into a usable state, if you want to start mapping > again. > > Little warning though: relations are completely broken with Potlatch. > Don't do anything with relations in there until it's fixed or you may > completely destroy existing relations. In fact

Re: [OSM-talk] more changeset question

2009-04-22 Thread Shaun McDonald
On 22 Apr 2009, at 11:41, Etienne Chové wrote: > Shaun McDonald a écrit : >> On 22 Apr 2009, at 10:56, maning sambale wrote: >> >>> limits to the number if node/way edits/deletion/addition per >>> changeset >>> >> >> There is a maximum of 50,000 nodes, ways or relations per changeset. >> There

Re: [OSM-talk] 500 Internal Server Error

2009-04-22 Thread Shaun McDonald
This was due to a database restart to increase the number of connections to the database server. Should now be back up now. Shaun On 22 Apr 2009, at 11:47, Barnett, Phillip wrote: > Getting problems accessing www.openstreetmap.org > > > PHILLIP BARNETT > SERVER MANAGER > > 200 GRAY'S INN ROAD

[OSM-talk] 500 Internal Server Error

2009-04-22 Thread Barnett, Phillip
Getting problems accessing www.openstreetmap.org PHILLIP BARNETT SERVER MANAGER 200 GRAY'S INN ROAD LONDON WC1X 8XZ UNITED KINGDOM T +44 (0)20 7430 4474 F E phillip.barn...@itn.co.uk http://WWW.ITN.CO.UK P Please consider the environment. Do you really need to print this email? Please Note:

Re: [OSM-talk] more changeset question

2009-04-22 Thread Etienne Chové
Shaun McDonald a écrit : > On 22 Apr 2009, at 10:56, maning sambale wrote: > >> limits to the number if node/way edits/deletion/addition per changeset >> > > There is a maximum of 50,000 nodes, ways or relations per changeset. > There is a maximum of 2000 nodes per way. Is-it possible to give ma

Re: [OSM-talk] more changeset question

2009-04-22 Thread Shaun McDonald
In fact this is documented on the wiki: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_Protocol_Version_0.6#New_Limits Shaun On 22 Apr 2009, at 11:33, maning sambale wrote: > Alright. Thanks for the info > > > On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 6:25 PM, Shaun McDonald > wrote: >> Bulk imports need to be split int

Re: [OSM-talk] more changeset question

2009-04-22 Thread Iván Sánchez Ortega
El Miércoles, 22 de Abril de 2009, maning sambale escribió: > Thanks! seems reasonable for my regular editing session. What about > bulk imports? There is one script to bulk-upload stuff in SVN (apps/utils/import/bulk_upload_06). It does split big files into smaller chunks. Expect it to be bug

Re: [OSM-talk] more changeset question

2009-04-22 Thread Shaun McDonald
Bulk imports need to be split into smaller uploads. The build uploaders will need to get smarter. Shaun On 22 Apr 2009, at 11:19, maning sambale wrote: > Thanks! seems reasonable for my regular editing session. What about > bulk imports? > > On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 6:17 PM, Shaun McDonald >

Re: [OSM-talk] more changeset question

2009-04-22 Thread maning sambale
Thanks! seems reasonable for my regular editing session. What about bulk imports? On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 6:17 PM, Shaun McDonald wrote: > > On 22 Apr 2009, at 10:56, maning sambale wrote: > >> limits to the number if node/way edits/deletion/addition per changeset >> > > > There is a maximum of

Re: [OSM-talk] more changeset question

2009-04-22 Thread Shaun McDonald
On 22 Apr 2009, at 10:56, maning sambale wrote: > limits to the number if node/way edits/deletion/addition per changeset > There is a maximum of 50,000 nodes, ways or relations per changeset. There is a maximum of 2000 nodes per way. Shaun ___ talk

Re: [OSM-talk] more changeset question

2009-04-22 Thread Iván Sánchez Ortega
El Miércoles, 22 de Abril de 2009, maning sambale escribió: > limits to the number if node/way edits/deletion/addition per changeset AFAIK, 5. -- -- Iván Sánchez Ortega You will soon meet a person who will play an important role in your life. signature.asc

[OSM-talk] more changeset question

2009-04-22 Thread maning sambale
limits to the number if node/way edits/deletion/addition per changeset -- cheers, maning -- "Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/ blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/ --

Re: [OSM-talk] We're back - forum login

2009-04-22 Thread Lambertus
A sudden upset stomach caused some delay, but the forum login is working again. Lambertus wrote: > marcus.wolsc...@googlemail.com wrote: >> Login in the forum still seems to be broken. >> Getting 400 Bad Request on login. >> > Yes, apparently the user details API call has changed enough to break

[OSM-talk] GPX track upload failure

2009-04-22 Thread Ed Avis
I tried to upload a .gpx file with about 4500 trackpoints, but when I press Upload the page waits for about a minute and then my web browser says 'The connection to the server was reset while the page was loading.'. This happens every time. (I was able to upload GPX files before, but they were us

Re: [OSM-talk] We're back

2009-04-22 Thread Richard Fairhurst
Ed Loach wrote: > When editing, Potlatch no longer shows what relations an > existing way is part of. I'm assuming this isn't deliberate. Still trying to track this one down. It works 100% as intended on my local test setup, with the latest svn code and the latest Potlatch (though still running