Re: [OSM-talk] "The Future of Free and Open-Source Maps" Slashdot.org , Saturday February 17, 2018

2018-02-17 Thread Milo van der Linden
"but where Google starts to go haywire is in the properly mapped areas." As someone who lives remote in the Netherlands, I can agree to that. DHL, UPS, even ambulances; they are still unable to find my house although I am living here 7 years now. But, I think OSM is also going haywire in the Neth

Re: [OSM-talk] diversity-talk: No such list

2018-02-17 Thread Nelson A. de Oliveira
On Sat, Feb 17, 2018 at 7:03 PM, Andrew Hain wrote: > According to the Wayback Machine the last message was posted early in 2015. Actually on October 17 https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/diversity-talk While it's possible to see the archives, it's not possible to see the list details. _

Re: [OSM-talk] "The Future of Free and Open-Source Maps" Slashdot.org , Saturday February 17, 2018

2018-02-17 Thread Colin Smale
On 2018-02-17 22:02, Jakob Mühldorfer wrote: > Thanks for pointing it out to us! > > I too have some thoughts on points in the article. > One I agree with, one not > > Let me start with this one: > "No Support For Observational, or Other Datasets" > This is the point I agree with. > OSM is missi

Re: [OSM-talk] diversity-talk: No such list

2018-02-17 Thread Andrew Hain
According to the Wayback Machine the last message was posted early in 2015. -- Andrew From: Sérgio V. Sent: 17 February 2018 19:56:57 To: talk@openstreetmap.org Subject: [OSM-talk] diversity-talk: No such list Hi, I've just realized that in the https://

Re: [OSM-talk] "The Future of Free and Open-Source Maps" Slashdot.org , Saturday February 17, 2018

2018-02-17 Thread Jakob Mühldorfer
Thanks for pointing it out to us! I too have some thoughts on points in the article. One I agree with, one not Let me start with this one: "No Support For Observational, or Other Datasets" This is the point I agree with. OSM is missing out on some valuable information due to this strict "verifi

[OSM-talk] diversity-talk: No such list

2018-02-17 Thread Sérgio V .
Hi, I've just realized that in the https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Diversity at the bottom, /Resources, there's no such link to https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/diversity-talk If you click there , or search for it, it returns "No such list diversity-talk". Is it still alive? - -

Re: [OSM-talk] "The Future of Free and Open-Source Maps" Slashdot.org , Saturday February 17, 2018

2018-02-17 Thread Colin Smale
Java and Javascript have only those four letters in common. They are completely unconnected in all other respects. On 2018-02-17 19:54, john whelan wrote: > JAVA script is used by web sites. It does not require JAVA to be installed. > > JAVA itself may or may not be a security risk the issue is

Re: [OSM-talk] "The Future of Free and Open-Source Maps" Slashdot.org , Saturday February 17, 2018

2018-02-17 Thread john whelan
JAVA script is used by web sites. It does not require JAVA to be installed. JAVA itself may or may not be a security risk the issue is that it has been declared one by the US government in the past and that means many organisations will not permit it to be installed. Relevant because it is a con

Re: [OSM-talk] "The Future of Free and Open-Source Maps" Slashdot.org , Saturday February 17, 2018

2018-02-17 Thread Nicolás Alvarez
Curiously enough those same organizations and governments then run Java web apps on their servers. Java isn't a security risk, Java applets running inside a browser are the problem. And that's blocked by browsers nowadays. I don't understand why this is relevant to the original discussion though..

Re: [OSM-talk] "The Future of Free and Open-Source Maps" Slashdot.org , Saturday February 17, 2018

2018-02-17 Thread john whelan
The JAVA issue comes up as many use work machines and since JAVA has been identified by the US government as a security risk some time ago many organisations do not permit it's installation on their equipment. Which means in simple terms you can't use the building_tool plugin when mapping building

Re: [OSM-talk] "The Future of Free and Open-Source Maps" Slashdot.org , Saturday February 17, 2018

2018-02-17 Thread James
You would need to install mono to run it and not everyone has mono or wants it installed(thats the problem with Virtual Machine languages). We would also have to rename it to Cosm. Doesn't have a nice ring to it ;). On Feb 17, 2018 1:19 PM, "Mike N" wrote: > On 2/17/2018 11:01 AM, James wrote: >

Re: [OSM-talk] "The Future of Free and Open-Source Maps" Slashdot.org , Saturday February 17, 2018

2018-02-17 Thread Mike N
On 2/17/2018 11:01 AM, James wrote: except it wouldnt be multiplatform and only run on windows 🤢🤮. Java is a better alternative as it's a popular language and is multiplatform. C/c++ is a bit more complicated and not everyone can contribute. That's no longer true - .Net is open source and gene

Re: [OSM-talk] "The Future of Free and Open-Source Maps" Slashdot.org , Saturday February 17, 2018

2018-02-17 Thread Nicolás Alvarez
El 17 feb. 2018, a la(s) 06:56, Oleksiy Muzalyev escribió: > This article is on the front page of the Slashdot today: > > Fri 16 February 2018 "Why OpenStreetMap is in Serious Trouble" > > https://blog.emacsen.net/blog/2018/02/16/osm-is-in-trouble/ > > > "The Future of Free and Open-Source M

Re: [OSM-talk] "The Future of Free and Open-Source Maps" Slashdot.org , Saturday February 17, 2018

2018-02-17 Thread James
except it wouldnt be multiplatform and only run on windows 🤢🤮. Java is a better alternative as it's a popular language and is multiplatform. C/c++ is a bit more complicated and not everyone can contribute. On Feb 17, 2018 10:56 AM, "john whelan" wrote: > I think that highlights the point on the

Re: [OSM-talk] "The Future of Free and Open-Source Maps" Slashdot.org , Saturday February 17, 2018

2018-02-17 Thread john whelan
I think that highlights the point on the limited resources available on the resource side. What we have sort of works. Could it be better? Most probably. The JOSM editor is very nice but it runs over JAVA and JAVA has been recognised as a security problem and it not recommended for many corpora

Re: [OSM-talk] "The Future of Free and Open-Source Maps" Slashdot.org , Saturday February 17, 2018

2018-02-17 Thread Eugene Alvin Villar
On Sat, Feb 17, 2018 at 9:53 PM, john whelan wrote: > Possibly a technical working group to identify areas that could be > improved or even if we were to start over again how would we do it from a > technical point of view? Funding would be a different problem. > I believe the now-defunct Strat

Re: [OSM-talk] "The Future of Free and Open-Source Maps" Slashdot.org , Saturday February 17, 2018

2018-02-17 Thread john whelan
I think there are some valid points but change is hard and needs a lot more resources than we have available at the moment. HOT has a validation process but if you look at their projects its rarely used and when it is a new mapper has been permitted to validate. OSM has come as far as it has with

Re: [OSM-talk] "The Future of Free and Open-Source Maps" Slashdot.org , Saturday February 17, 2018

2018-02-17 Thread Michał Brzozowski
The emacsen's blog post is spot on. I see it as a call for change from a person who genuinely cares about OSM, not a bitter rant. When you say A and the world says B, it maybe well worth considering that B is the way to go. I think many other people share his views, but were afraid to voice it, j

Re: [OSM-talk] "The Future of Free and Open-Source Maps" Slashdot.org , Saturday February 17, 2018

2018-02-17 Thread Tomas Straupis
2018-02-17 11:56 GMT+02:00 Oleksiy Muzalyev wrote: > For instance, reviews. I hope it will not come to what there is at some > commercial maps, when one adds say a building and then has to wait for a > month that an almighty moderator approves it, so that it appears on the map. This is an expect

Re: [OSM-talk] "The Future of Free and Open-Source Maps" Slashdot.org , Saturday February 17, 2018

2018-02-17 Thread Maarten Deen
On 2018-02-17 10:56, Oleksiy Muzalyev wrote: This article is on the front page of the Slashdot today: Fri 16 February 2018 "Why OpenStreetMap is in Serious Trouble" https://blog.emacsen.net/blog/2018/02/16/osm-is-in-trouble/ Interesting that he mentions that "the proprietary mapping world has

[OSM-talk] "The Future of Free and Open-Source Maps" Slashdot.org , Saturday February 17, 2018

2018-02-17 Thread Oleksiy Muzalyev
This article is on the front page of the Slashdot today: Fri 16 February 2018 "Why OpenStreetMap is in Serious Trouble" https://blog.emacsen.net/blog/2018/02/16/osm-is-in-trouble/ "The Future of Free and Open-Source Maps" https://news.slashdot.org/story/18/02/16/2216228/the-future-of-free-and

[OSM-talk] weeklyOSM #395 2018-02-06-2018-02-12

2018-02-17 Thread weeklyteam
The weekly round-up of OSM news, issue # 395, is now available online in English, giving as always a summary of all things happening in the openstreetmap world: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/en/archives/10018/ Enjoy! weeklyOSM? who?: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WeeklyOSM#Available_Languages