Re: [Talk-it] Tag presenti in Italia

2019-05-09 Thread Luca Delucchi
On Thu, 9 May 2019 at 10:29, Daniele Forsi wrote: > > Il giorno gio 9 mag 2019 alle ore 10:02 Luca Delucchi ha scritto: > > > Riusciamo almeno a correggere gli errori di digitalizzazione? (si > > potrebbe provare con la distanza di Levenshtein [0] o qualcosa di > > simile) > > per suggerire le

[OSM-ja] 5/14 一関市 花と泉の公園マッピングパーティ

2019-05-09 Thread Tomomichi Hayakawa
Tomです。 来週の14日に、一関市の花と泉の公園でマッピングパーティを開催します。 園内のMapillaryを中心にして、JOSMのハンズオンも予定しています。 平日ですので、募集人数は少なめに設定していますが、 多くの方のご参加をお待ちしています。 基本的に初心者向けですので、お気軽にご参加ください。 「スマホを使って 歩いて作る ぼたん園マップ」 ぼたん園内を散策して、楽しみながら地図を作ります。 ゆるーり観光しながら現地調査、ベゴニア館のレストランに移動して地図編集。 本イベントでは、ぼたん園の散策をした後、皆さんと一緒に地図を編集します。

Re: [OSM-talk] iD invents nosquare=yes for buildings which should not be squared

2019-05-09 Thread Greg Troxel
Michael Reichert writes: > JOSM runs its validation rules only on objects modified or created in > the current session. This seems more sensible both for experienced users > and newbies for two reasons: That seems like the right thing to do. > - Uses don't get overwhelmed with dozens or

[OSM-talk-fr] operateur d'un service postal post_office:type=post_partner

2019-05-09 Thread marc marc
Bonjour, Un service postal post_office:type=post_partner ne devrait-il se voir supprimer le operator="La Poste" ? il y en a actuellement 827 https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/IRp Je ne demande aussi si ce nettoyage nécessiterait brand/network="La Poste" pour faire la différence avec la collecte et

Re: [OSM-talk] iD invents nosquare=yes for buildings which should not be squared

2019-05-09 Thread Jmapb
On 5/9/2019 6:21 PM, Michael Reichert wrote: JOSM runs its validation rules only on objects modified or created in the current session. This seems more sensible both for experienced users and newbies for two reasons: - Uses don't get overwhelmed with dozens or hundreds of reports on objects

Re: [OSM-talk] iD invents nosquare=yes for buildings which should not be squared

2019-05-09 Thread Michael Reichert
Hi, Am 10.05.19 um 00:00 schrieb Jmapb: > This strikes me as a pretty bad idea. I map in NYC where we have lots, > lots, lots of nearly-square buildings with official footprints imported > from the city's open data initiative. When a mapper not familiar with > the history here gets a message from

Re: [OSM-talk] iD invents nosquare=yes for buildings which should not be squared

2019-05-09 Thread Christoph Hormann
On Thursday 09 May 2019, Simon Poole wrote: > > The question was not about validating square or not square buildings, > it is about storing a hint for iDs validation mechanism permanently > in OSMs data. There is some precedent for doing so, as was mentioned > in the github issue, still it is a

Re: [OSM-talk] iD invents nosquare=yes for buildings which should not be squared

2019-05-09 Thread Michael Reichert
Hi Mikel, Am 09.05.19 um 23:14 schrieb Mikel Maron: > Absolutely. My understanding is this feature will greatly improve data > quality in OSM. I think it's fair to validate squareness of existing > buildings. I did not say that I am against the validation rule itself. I agree that the rule is

Re: [OSM-talk] iD invents nosquare=yes for buildings which should not be squared

2019-05-09 Thread john whelan
I agree it's a bad idea inflating the database size and I don't agree that all buildings should be square. Let iD warn about buildings mapped in this session by all means but that does not require all existing buildings to be square. Cheerio John On Thu, 9 May 2019 at 18:02, Jmapb wrote: > On

Re: [OSM-talk] iD invents nosquare=yes for buildings which should not be squared

2019-05-09 Thread Jmapb
On 5/9/2019 4:14 PM, Michael Reichert wrote Quincy Morgan, one of the maintainers of iD, invented a new tag called nosquare=yes today which should be added to buildings which are not square and should not be flagged by iD's validator. This strikes me as a pretty bad idea. I map in NYC where

Re: [OSM-talk] iD invents nosquare=yes for buildings which should not be squared

2019-05-09 Thread Simon Poole
Am 09.05.2019 um 23:14 schrieb Mikel Maron: > > What do you think? Should the next version of iD be deployed on > www.openstreetmap.org? > > Absolutely. My understanding is this feature will greatly improve data > quality in OSM. I think it's fair to validate squareness of existing > buildings.

Re: [talk-cz] Body záchrany Lesy ČR

2019-05-09 Thread Majka
Souhlasím se vším uvedeným, jen source se aktuálně doporučuje (na import listu) jen na sadě změn, kde je uvedený. To ostatní všechno vyplývá z bodu jedna - každý import je třeba projednat tady a minimálně oznámit na import listu. Na 90% se proti tomu někdo ozve, tohle bude jednoznačně flagnuto

Re: [OSM-talk] iD invents nosquare=yes for buildings which should not be squared

2019-05-09 Thread Nelson A. de Oliveira
On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 6:18 PM Mikel Maron wrote: > Absolutely. My understanding is this feature will greatly improve data > quality in OSM. I think it's fair to validate squareness of existing > buildings. Appreciate the great work of the iD team. Instead inventing a new tag, it could simply

Re: [talk-cz] Body záchrany Lesy ČR

2019-05-09 Thread Jan Macura
Také zdravím, určitě díky za pěkné obohacení OSM a zařízení souhlasu od instituce! (btw, nebyl by písemně?) Mám ale několik připomínek, které mi kazí radost... Kde je souhlas komunity OSM s importem? Jak byly řešeny vzniknuvší duplicity v datech? Jak byly vybrány použité tagy? Proč jsou u bodů

Re: [OSM-talk] iD invents nosquare=yes for buildings which should not be squared

2019-05-09 Thread Yves
Not the first time tagging is bent to editor's will, but this one is gross. Yves Le 9 mai 2019 22:14:31 GMT+02:00, Michael Reichert a écrit : >Hi, > >this could be seen as a tagging discussion but I think that it is a >discussion on governance and power. That's why this email goes to the >Talk

Re: [OSM-talk] iD invents nosquare=yes for buildings which should not be squared

2019-05-09 Thread Mikel Maron
> What do you think? Should the next version of iD be deployed on > www.openstreetmap.org? Absolutely. My understanding is this feature will greatly improve data quality in OSM. I think it's fair to validate squareness of existing buildings. Appreciate the great work of the iD team.  Also

Re: [Talk-transit] Ideas for a simplified public transportation scheme

2019-05-09 Thread Markus
On Tue, 7 May 2019 at 21:15, Jarek Piórkowski wrote: > > 7c. From what I'm understand, this bus stop node does not have to be > connected to a pedestrian highway either, with routers presumably > jumping from the nearest highway? Yes, this is what OsmAnd does. > 8. A stop_location (to use ptv2

[Talk-de] iD führt nosquare=yes für nicht rechtwinklige Gebäude ein (WAS: Besorgt über den iD-Editor)

2019-05-09 Thread Michael Reichert
Hallo, Am 29.03.19 um 21:13 schrieb Christoph Hormann: > Was ich allerdings durchaus auch sehe ist ein zunehmender Trend, dass > wesentlich Projekte in OSM zunehmend von einer "selbstgekrönten" > technokratischen Elite dominiert werden, für die die Arbeit daran nicht > mehr Mittel zum Zweck

Re: [Talk-transit] Ideas for a simplified public transportation scheme

2019-05-09 Thread Markus
On Wed, 8 May 2019 at 22:15, Tijmen Stam wrote: > > On 06-05-19 19:29, Stephen Sprunk wrote: > > > > I'd love to see stop areas go away, or at least limited to instances > > where the link between stop position and platform can't be deduced from > > geometry. Heck, in most cases, the stop

[talk-cz] Body záchrany Lesy ČR

2019-05-09 Thread Spratek
Zdravím, se souhlasem Lesů ČR jsem na OSM nahrál kompletní seznam Bodů záchrany spravovaných Lesy ČR. Celkem jich je 2171. Přehledná mapka bodů je zde: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Body_z%C3%A1chrany_-_Lesy_%C4%8CR.jpg Doufám, že jich bude potřeba co nejmíň. Míru zdar.

[OSM-talk] iD invents nosquare=yes for buildings which should not be squared

2019-05-09 Thread Michael Reichert
Hi, this could be seen as a tagging discussion but I think that it is a discussion on governance and power. That's why this email goes to the Talk mailing list. Quincy Morgan, one of the maintainers of iD, invented a new tag called nosquare=yes today which should be added to buildings which are

Re: [Talk-transit] Ideas for a simplified public transportation scheme

2019-05-09 Thread Jo
The thing is, as the area around Stockholm clearly shows, highway=bus_stop is indeed sufficient. If I were to remove all the public_transport=platform/bus=yes tags from the stops in Belgium, it's very likely that nobody would notice. If I were to remove highway=bus_stop, all of sudden it would

Re: [Talk-transit] Ideas for a simplified public transportation scheme

2019-05-09 Thread DC Viennablog
Yes, one object would be nice, however, I think it should be versatile enough to be able to be a node, line or polygon. So basically what public_transport=platform is. I also don't mind it being called "platform", even if there is only a pole stuck in a field. That would not make p_t:v2 mapping

[Talk-GB] OSMF Board face-to face meeting: Suggest the topics and issues that matter to you

2019-05-09 Thread Rob Nickerson
Hi all, Some may be interested in completing the following super short survey: https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2019/05/09/osmf-board-face-to-face-meeting-suggest-the-topics-and-issues-that-matter-to-you/ For those who don't know, the OSMF is the "international not-for-profit organization

Re: [Talk-it] Aggiornamento distributori provincia di Taranto

2019-05-09 Thread Cascafico Giovanni
> > [1] http://audit.osmz.ru/project/FuelLE/ > Ooops, scusate: il link corretto è http://audit.osmz.ru/project/Fuel TA ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org

[OSM-ja] What is Japan_tagging?(Re: Proposed Japan tagging/Road typesの投票について)

2019-05-09 Thread 石野貴之
石野です。眠れないので続きを…・ Japan_tagging > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Japan_tagging > Map features > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:Map_Features > How to map a > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JA:How_to_map_a > のそれぞれの役割については、現時点での私の理解では ・Japan_tagging: 日本国内のマッピングで遵守すべき【仕様】 ・Map

Re: [Talk-transit] Ideas for a simplified public transportation scheme

2019-05-09 Thread Jo
I have been holding off to respond to this. Almost a decade ago I started asking for public_transport=platform combined with bus=yes to be rendered, so it would become possible to drop highway=bus_stop. After all those years it has become obvious that there is no willingness to do so. So it makes

[Talk-transit] Rendering for public_transport=platform cancelled?

2019-05-09 Thread Tijmen Stam
Dear all, One of the greatest oppositions to using full pt_v2 (and thus abolishment of the double-tagging with highway=bus_stop/railway=tram_stop nodes where a linear/area public_transport=platform exists) was that public_transport=platform isn't rendered on osm-carto. Now it seems, that

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Îlot central

2019-05-09 Thread osm . sanspourriel
En clair mettre suivant le cas crossing:island=yes ou traffic_calming=island ? Je suis d'accord. Ou as-tu d'autres cas où tu voudrais une voie séparée ? Par exemple s'il s'agit disons d'un long muret ? Jean-Yvon Le 09/05/2019 à 13:35, Florimond Berthoux - florimond.berth...@gmail.com a écrit :

Re: [talk-cz] Kontrola integrity relací silniční sítě

2019-05-09 Thread jzvc via talk-cz
Cus, zcela urcite narazite na preruseny (a zcela spravne) silnice vsech kategorii. Typicky to tak byva v okoli vojenskych ujezdu. Silnice tam kdysi vedla, byla verejna a jiz neni, ale cislo zustalo (toto budou prevazne II a III). U dalnic to zas typicky vypada tak, ze proste nestoji cela ...

Re: [OSM-talk] [Osmf-talk] OSMF Board face-to face meeting: Suggest the topics and issues that matter to you

2019-05-09 Thread Paul Norman
On 2019-05-09 3:48 a.m., Christoph Hormann wrote: On Thursday 09 May 2019, Dorothea Kazazi wrote: The OSMF Board is going to have a face-to-face meeting in Brussels later in May for strategy and planning and you can suggest the topics and issues that matter to you:

[OSM-ja] Proposed Japan tagging/Road typesの投票について

2019-05-09 Thread 石野貴之
石野です。 Japan_taggingのImplies変更に関する提案への投票ですが、 5月11日が期限であるにも関わらず、現在の投票がhayashiさんと私だけという極めて低調な現状です。 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_Japan_tagging/Road_types そもそもJapan_taggingとは何なのか、そしてそのImpliesを改定することにはどのような意味があるのか、ということについてコミュニティー内での共通した認識がほとんどないのではないでしょうか。

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Îlot central

2019-05-09 Thread Jean-Claude Repetto
Le 09/05/2019 à 13:35, Florimond Berthoux a écrit : Bonjour, Tous les îlots ne servent pas forcément à "apaiser le trafic", ça serait plutôt même le contraire pour certains. Je suis d'avis à n'utiliser traffic_calming=island seulement lorsque c'est bien le but visé. +1 Jean-Claude

[Talk-it] Aggiornamento distributori provincia di Taranto

2019-05-09 Thread Cascafico Giovanni
Ho appena pubblicato l'audit [1] per gli amenity|waterway=fuel della provincia di Taranto. L'aggiornamento riguarda: - aggiunta tipi carburante - aggiunta tag fixme "might be dismantled" laddove non ci sia match tra dataset MISE e - aggiunta tag fixme name laddove no match con brand - modifiche

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Îlot central

2019-05-09 Thread Florimond Berthoux
Bonjour, Tous les îlots ne servent pas forcément à "apaiser le trafic", ça serait plutôt même le contraire pour certains. Je suis d'avis à n'utiliser traffic_calming=island seulement lorsque c'est bien le but visé. Le mar. 7 mai 2019 à 23:08, Liozone a écrit : > > Je note que sur JOSM,

[talk-cz] Wikimedia Hackathon v Praze

2019-05-09 Thread Tom Ka
Ahoj, dostali jsme pozvánku s žádostí o šíření od kolegů z Wikimedie: blíží se pražský mezinárodní Wikimedia Hackathon 17. - 19. května 2019. V sobotu dopoledne proběhne setkání i v češtině! Témata zahrnují i věci kolem map, tak se neváhejte přidat.

Re: [Talk-transit] Ideas for a simplified public transportation scheme

2019-05-09 Thread Dave F via Talk-transit
On 08/05/2019 20:56, Tijmen Stam wrote: I never understood the whole railway=platform discussion. IHMO hw=bus_stop, hw=platform and rw=platform should die, and all be replaced by public_transport=platform You fail to say why. I have updated entire public transport concessions with almost

Re: [Talk-it] Tag presenti in Italia

2019-05-09 Thread Daniele Forsi
Il giorno gio 9 mag 2019 alle ore 11:23 Andrea Enzo ha scritto: > Si potrebbe realizzare in python, ci sono ottimi moduli, come questo [1]. > > > [1] https://github.com/seatgeek/fuzzywuzzy come è rispetto alle funzioni di PostgreSQL? https://www.postgresql.org/docs/11/fuzzystrmatch.html visto

Re: [Talk-it] Tag presenti in Italia

2019-05-09 Thread Andy Townsend
On 09/05/2019 08:45, Ale_Zena_IT via Talk-it wrote: In questo periodo per lavoro stò scremando i tag del planet ed ho trovato veramente di tutto. Se aprite taginfo scoprite che su OSM sono presenti oltre 74.000 chiavi. There are taginfo sites for many countries at

[Diversity-talk] OSMF seeks input for the upcoming board meeting

2019-05-09 Thread Heather Leson
Hi OpenStreetMap Foundations' board is meeting next weekend in Brussels. There is a short survey to get your input. Note - Allen Gunn of Aspiration Tech will be reviewing this and guiding us. Details:

Re: [Talk-it] Tag presenti in Italia

2019-05-09 Thread Andrea Enzo
Si potrebbe realizzare in python, ci sono ottimi moduli, come questo [1]. [1] https://github.com/seatgeek/fuzzywuzzy -- Inviato dal mio dispositivo Android con K-9 Mail. Perdonate la brevità.___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org

[OSM-talk] OSMF Board face-to face meeting: Suggest the topics and issues that matter to you

2019-05-09 Thread Dorothea Kazazi
Hello, The OSMF Board is going to have a face-to-face meeting in Brussels later in May for strategy and planning and you can suggest the topics and issues that matter to you: https://osmf.limequery.org/489698?lang=en The survey has just 3 questions. Thanks for participating :) warm greetings,

Re: [Talk-it] Tag presenti in Italia

2019-05-09 Thread Maurizio Napolitano
> Riusciamo almeno a correggere gli errori di digitalizzazione? (si > potrebbe provare con la distanza di Levenshtein [0] o qualcosa di > simile) Vuoi fare un bot? ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Talk-it] Tag presenti in Italia

2019-05-09 Thread Maurizio Napolitano
Mi sono trovato con un problema analogo guardando solo i valori associaati a "landuse" per l'Europa. Ho trovato molti errori di battitura, in altri casi l'assegnano del nome ed alltro ancora. Il più curioso è un "bales of hay" (balle di fieno) - https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/22963018 Dato

Re: [Talk-it] Grand-Saint-Bernard --> Edit-war

2019-05-09 Thread Andrea Albani
Il giorno gio 9 mag 2019 alle ore 09:45 Andrea Musuruane ha scritto: > Ciao, >se ricordo correttamente la parte svizzera è classificata come > autostrasse (con questo cartello: > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:AutostrasseCH.png) mentre la > parte italiana è classificata come

Re: [Talk-it] Tag presenti in Italia

2019-05-09 Thread Daniele Forsi
Il giorno gio 9 mag 2019 alle ore 10:02 Luca Delucchi ha scritto: > Riusciamo almeno a correggere gli errori di digitalizzazione? (si > potrebbe provare con la distanza di Levenshtein [0] o qualcosa di > simile) per suggerire le correzioni? Si potrebbe confrontare quelli più usati con quelli

Re: [Talk-it] Tag presenti in Italia

2019-05-09 Thread Luca Delucchi
On Thu, 9 May 2019 at 09:45, Ale_Zena_IT via Talk-it wrote: > > In questo periodo per lavoro stò scremando i tag del planet ed ho trovato > veramente di tutto. Se aprite taginfo scoprite che su OSM sono presenti oltre > 74.000 chiavi. > > Ieri ho scaricato l'Italia ed ho tirato giù la lista dei

Re: [Talk-it] Grand-Saint-Bernard --> Edit-war

2019-05-09 Thread Andrea Musuruane
Ciao, se ricordo correttamente la parte svizzera è classificata come autostrasse (con questo cartello: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:AutostrasseCH.png) mentre la parte italiana è classificata come autostrada (con questo cartello

[Talk-it] Tag presenti in Italia

2019-05-09 Thread Ale_Zena_IT via Talk-it
In questo periodo per lavoro stò scremando i tag del planet ed ho trovato veramente di tutto. Se aprite taginfo scoprite che su OSM sono presenti oltre 74.000 chiavi. Ieri ho scaricato l'Italia ed ho tirato giù la lista dei valori di highway, building, railway, amenity, natural, shop, place,

[Talk-it] Grand-Saint-Bernard --> Edit-war

2019-05-09 Thread Andrea Enzo
Buongiorno, Sul forum nel post Tunnel du Grand-Saint-Bernard [1] propongono di mettere sulla way del tunnel il tag highway=trunk. È secondo voi fattibile e/o corretto? Propongono anche una votazione. [1] https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=748162#p748162 -- Inviato dal mio