I agree that in this case I would tolerate it, but is it still allowed
to turn from East Mineral avenue to the North-South, unclassified
highway?
If not, one should add turn restrictions.
regards
m
On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 11:11 PM Tom Pfeifer wrote:
>
> On 03.07.2019 22:03, Jack Armstrong Dance
On the order of things.
Best to tell them what to do first. This provides some motivation.
Leave 'what not to do' for last, these tend to turn people away.
So I would do:
1 One feature, one OSM element
2 Good changeset comments (+Keep the history)
3 Editing Standards: (Alig
As mentioned, I plan to significantly shorten the "Keep the history"
section, with a link to the longer version at
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history instead.
I would probably support shortening the page even further, but I've
already had several edits reverted by other users who
Hmm... I would be all in favor of extending the See also... section and shorten
drastically the page to keep it simple.
Some of the good practices there are second order, don't you think?
Keeping history compared to Tag for the renderer, for example.
Yves
Le 4 juillet 2019 05:53:23 GMT+02:00, Jo
I've reordered and reworded several sections of the Good practice
page: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice
The page had grown over the years from 6 or 7 initial sections:
(First verion of page in 2008
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Good_practice&oldid=86242)
1) Do
Context is important. If it's being controlled as a separate way (like an
angled deceleration or acceleration lane, or a flush median porkchop, or
the gore on a median bullnose), that's a good candidate for
placement=transition.
Keep in mind this gets super messy if you dont take context and inte
On 03.07.2019 22:03, Jack Armstrong Dancer--- via talk wrote:
I've always had the impression we should not create separate traffic lanes unless "traffic flows are
physically separated by a barrier (e.g., grass, concrete, steel), which prevents movements between
said flows."
Yes, I agree in gen
I would consider such mapping as linked as incorrect and delete this extra ways
on encountering them in my normal mapping.
Is there any reason to handle this situation in other way? Maybe there are some
physical
barriers (for example concrete blocks) installed there?
3 Jul 2019, 22:03 by talk@
I've always had the impression we should not create separate traffic lanes unless "traffic flows are physically separated by a barrier (e.g., grass, concrete, steel), which prevents movements between said flows."In other words, paint is not a barrier. Should we create highway links based solely on
9 matches
Mail list logo
