=10.22065&layers=TBTTT
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/2568465
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/2568460
I don't know if it renders them also without the stop_area relation...
/bruno
--
CONTACTS http://tracciabi.li/~bruno/contacts.html 2nd email br...@tracciabi.li
GN
proach gives me, I usually feel like "couldn't they just
compromise on ONE way of tagging this? what if I tag it wrong?", but
that's probably my fault...
/bruno
* Yes, I'm talking about public_transport
--
CONTACTS http://tracciabi.li/~bruno/contacts.html 2nd em
ble to see the map only after allowing the browser to share my
location (I always browse in privacy mode).
It works; in Jakarta
http://tracciabi.li/~bruno/av/ss_20121115-120336.png
No POI is shown in Milan (Italy) or Mumbai (India), but in both cities I
saw some strange grey small squares with
0
elements I modified?
Those which ARE airport will get their (annoying) amenity=airport tag
back and keep aeroway=aerodrome.
Those which are NOT airports will get stripped of also
aeroway=aerodrome.
--
CONTACTS ==> http://tracciabi.li/~brun
On dom, 2012-06-17 at 16:30 +0200, colliar wrote:
> It is your decision but you will probably gain more friends by reverting
> and making more careful mechanical edits including reporting about it in
> advance.
"reverting" means to upload the old version of those nodes/relati
sorry for the mess :-|
What do we do?
/bruno
[1] http://tracciabi.li/~bruno/av/amenity-airport.osm
--
CONTACTS ==> http://tracciabi.li/~bruno/contacts.html <==
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
6 matches
Mail list logo
