I tried but many conflicts appeared in JOSM I'm not experienced to do it.
Please if someone can do it. It's not only this 3 changeset but most of that
user.
>>Saturday, October 24, 2020 10:57 AM -05:00 from Erick de Oliveira Leal <
>>erickdeoliveiral...@gmail.com >:
>>
>>Good morning, a
In ID, on your profile page is, Other nearby users, and the home location, map
the point is other locals based on my (our) edits know where we (I) live, but
come on
don’t edit the building i (we) live in !___
talk mailing list
In ID, on your profile page is, Other nearby users, and the home location, map
the point is other locals based on my (our) edits know where we (I) live, but
come on
don’t edit the building i (we) live in !___
Talk-us mailing list
I'll certainly get the chance to survey many of the estimated
stop positions I remotely mapped. I hope to see you around as we continue
working on the same things.
On Sat, Aug 22, 2020, 12:21 PM 80hnhtv4agou--- via Talk-transit <
talk-tran...@openstreetmap.org > wrote:
>>it was one pers
>it was one person in CA adding 400 unverified tags to rail service in chicago.
>
>one just 818 m, away from my home.
>
>>Saturday, August 22, 2020 12:32 PM -05:00 from Martin Koppenhoefer <
>>dieterdre...@gmail.com >:
>>
>>sent from a phone
>>
>>> On 22. Aug 2020, at 10:15, pangoSE <
>it was one person in CA adding 400 unverified tags to rail service in chicago.
>
>one just 818 m, away from my home.
>
>>Saturday, August 22, 2020 12:32 PM -05:00 from Martin Koppenhoefer <
>>dieterdre...@gmail.com >:
>>
>>sent from a phone
>>
>>> On 22. Aug 2020, at 10:15, pangoSE <
>it was one person in CA adding 400 unverified tags to rail service in chicago.
>
>one just 818 m, away from my home.
>
>>Saturday, August 22, 2020 12:32 PM -05:00 from Martin Koppenhoefer <
>>dieterdre...@gmail.com >:
>>
>>sent from a phone
>>
>>> On 22. Aug 2020, at 10:15, pangoSE <
FYI;
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Vandalism
Purposeful removal or degradation of data that are known to be correct,
Deliberate adding incorrect data;
People who revert other people's work should expect to be able to demonstrate
that the reversion was well reasoned and proportionate
FYI;
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Vandalism
Purposeful removal or degradation of data that are known to be correct,
Deliberate adding incorrect data;
People who revert other people's work should expect to be able to demonstrate
that the reversion was well reasoned and proportionate
different. The two border towns I
>checked just north in Lake County appear to line up perfectly with the Cook
>County data so this might just be a Cook County issue. This is a start but
>there's lots of work to do there.
>
>On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 9:10 PM 80hnhtv4agou--- v
different. The two border towns I
>checked just north in Lake County appear to line up perfectly with the Cook
>County data so this might just be a Cook County issue. This is a start but
>there's lots of work to do there.
>
>On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 9:10 PM 80hnhtv4agou--- v
most likely has the most authoritative dataset. You can
>>download it here:
>>https://hub-cookcountyil.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/534226c6b1034985aca1e14a2eb234af_2?geometry=-88.214%2C42.072%2C-87.560%2C42.161
>>
>>
>>On 8/18/2020 8 :51 PM, Mike Thompson wr
lines no relations yes
>Tuesday, August 18, 2020 7:52 PM -05:00 from Mike Thompson
>:
>
>
>On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 6:42 PM 80hnhtv4agou--- via Talk-us <
>talk...@openstreetmap.org > wrote:
>>i will fix anything that i missed but the lines are truth.
lines no relations yes
>Tuesday, August 18, 2020 7:52 PM -05:00 from Mike Thompson
>:
>
>
>On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 6:42 PM 80hnhtv4agou--- via Talk-us <
>talk-us@openstreetmap.org > wrote:
>>i will fix anything that i missed but the lines are truth.
. There are cairns at both corners. If the professional
>> surveyors couldn't close the line, what hope do I have? (Nobody
>> actually cares. It's wilderness anyway.)
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 8:03 PM 80hnhtv4agou--- via Talk-us <
>> talk...@openstreetmap.org &
. There are cairns at both corners. If the professional
>> surveyors couldn't close the line, what hope do I have? (Nobody
>> actually cares. It's wilderness anyway.)
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 8:03 PM 80hnhtv4agou--- via Talk-us <
>> talk-us@openstreetmap.org &
to change, but I can't change without actual
>information.
>
>On Tue, 2020-08-18 at 18:43 +0300, 80hnhtv4agou--- via Talk-us wrote:
>> i am looking at the TIRGER web, show’s the real map online and
>> nothing you did matches.
>>
>> i live here and a block away from
to change, but I can't change without actual
>information.
>
>On Tue, 2020-08-18 at 18:43 +0300, 80hnhtv4agou--- via Talk-us wrote:
>> i am looking at the TIRGER web, show’s the real map online and
>> nothing you did matches.
>>
>> i live here and a block away from
eset comment that
>> noted that the fixed relation didn't match and earlier unbroken
>> relation, in particular around the Edens Spur. I then changed the
>> border in this area to match the 2019 Tiger data in that area only.
>>
>> James
>>
>> On Tue, 2020
Changeset #89220282
>Monday, August 17, 2020 6:34 PM -05:00 from Mike Thompson
>:
>
>
>On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 5:24 PM 80hnhtv4agou--- via Talk-us <
>talk-us@openstreetmap.org > wrote:
>>tiger is up to date on the web map using the current data i just thi
in a built up area like this,
>seems unusual to me.
>
>Mike
>On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 5:04 PM 80hnhtv4agou--- via Talk-us <
>talk-us@openstreetmap.org > wrote:
>>this is not the current boundary, could be more than 10 years + old,
>>
>>can’t the whole relation, #
0 at 4:02 PM 80hnhtv4agou--- via Talk-us <
>talk-us@openstreetmap.org > wrote:
>>can somebody who knows how to use Tiger data fix this ?
>
>Fix what??
>___
>Talk-us mailing list
>Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
>https:
can somebody who knows how to use Tiger data fix this ?
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Did someone on this List, contribute to this Wiki.?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Dstop
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Did someone on this List, contribute to this Wiki.?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Dstop
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Did someone on this List, contribute to this Wiki.?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3Dstop
___
Talk-transit mailing list
Talk-transit@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
in the united states the hole thing starts out as gravel ,
>Saturday, July 18, 2020 3:44 PM -05:00 from Mike Thompson
>:
>
>
>On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 2:23 PM Mark Wagner < mark+...@carnildo.com > wrote:
>
>>* Two adjacent sections of track being tagged as "grade 2" and "grade
>> 4"
the Tag:railway=stop, has some of the same issues.
>Saturday, July 18, 2020 12:27 PM -05:00 from Jarek Piórkowski
>:
>
>On Sat, 18 Jul 2020 at 13:17, Daniel Capilla < dcapil...@gmail.com > wrote:
>> When we started mapping the bus routes in Málaga, Alan Grant and I came
>> to the conclusion
i think it is the same tag format that only will show on the standard map the
street name because no one puts the
the route no on the name line and that is the only thing the non editor see’s
not like the transit map where there is a route line.
the point is there is no pop up on the
In the USA bus stops (flag stops) are located for the most part at named
intersections, that is at where the street
sign is.
so you DO know where you are. but on the OSM standard map the bus stop tag
depending on the
editor does not show the route number, can you have the route
Are wi-fi passwords and the IP number of a hot spot, located in MC Donald,
burger-king, Starbucks,
motel 6, super 8, best western ect. public ?
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Are wi-fi passwords and the IP number of a hot spot, located in MC Donald,
burger-king, Starbucks,
motel 6, super 8, best western ect. public ?
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
if you want more information, you have to give more information.
>Saturday, June 27, 2020 2:23 PM -05:00 from Mike Thompson
>:
>
>
>On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 12:21 PM Bryan Housel < bhou...@gmail.com > wrote:
>>
>> I’d tag as `abandoned:power=minor_line` since you said it is down in
>
>>wrote:
>>>I made edits from 2000km away from where I live. But I was there on
>>>vacation. It's possible that these editors were there, even if they
>>>aren't locals ;)
>>>
>>>Just be happy about good edits in your region and talk to them
>
>>wrote:
>>>I made edits from 2000km away from where I live. But I was there on
>>>vacation. It's possible that these editors were there, even if they
>>>aren't locals ;)
>>>
>>>Just be happy about good edits in your region and talk to them
ything better. You have the power
>to fix this yourself. What's holding you back?
>On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 10:20 AM 80hnhtv4agou--- via Talk-us <
>talk...@openstreetmap.org > wrote:
>>I meant everbody is if they are not local.
>>
>>
>>>Tuesday, June 16,
ything better. You have the power
>to fix this yourself. What's holding you back?
>On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 10:20 AM 80hnhtv4agou--- via Talk-us <
>talk-us@openstreetmap.org > wrote:
>>I meant everbody is if they are not local.
>>
>>
>>>Tuesday, June 16,
Jun 16, 2020 at 9:11 AM 80hnhtv4agou--- via Talk-us <
>talk...@openstreetmap.org > wrote:
>>Added a service road.
>>Edited about hours ago by
>>Version #1 · Changeset #86698283
>>
>>https://imgur.com/gallery/k6Zjnqm
>>
>>
>>
>&g
I meant everbody is if they are not local.
>Tuesday, June 16, 2020 12:17 PM -05:00 from Maarten Deen :
>
>On 2020-06-16 18:09, 80hnhtv4agou--- via talk wrote:
>> Added a service road.
>>
>> Edited about hours ago by
>>
>> Version #1 · Changeset #86
I meant everbody is if they are not local.
>Tuesday, June 16, 2020 12:17 PM -05:00 from Maarten Deen :
>
>On 2020-06-16 18:09, 80hnhtv4agou--- via talk wrote:
>> Added a service road.
>>
>> Edited about hours ago by
>>
>> Version #1 · Changeset #86
Added a service road.
Edited about hours ago by
Version #1 · Changeset #86698283
https://imgur.com/gallery/k6Zjnqm
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Added a service road.
Edited about hours ago by
Version #1 · Changeset #86698283
https://imgur.com/gallery/k6Zjnqm
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
n D. wrote:
>>>>tunnel looks better than bridge, water is still visible under the layer of
>>>>bridge, or area, does not hide water.
>>>>
>>>>tunnel hides water.
>>>>
>>>>>Friday, June 5, 2020 8:43 AM -05:00 from Dave F via
OK !
>Saturday, June 13, 2020 4:25 PM -05:00 from Shawn K. Quinn
>:
>
>On 6/13/20 09:08, 80hnhtv4agou--- via Talk-us wrote:
>> If you people want me to prove my edit by adding a source, and a
>> person from the data group as an editor,
>>
>> asks me to
OK !
>Saturday, June 13, 2020 3:56 PM -05:00 from Mike Thompson
>:
>
>
>On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 11:20 AM 80hnhtv4agou--- via Talk-us <
>talk-us@openstreetmap.org > wrote:
>>
>> I am not copying any thing, just looking at a satellite view from google .
OK !
>Saturday, June 13, 2020 3:56 PM -05:00 from Mike Thompson
>:
>
>
>On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 11:20 AM 80hnhtv4agou--- via Talk-us <
>talk...@openstreetmap.org > wrote:
>>
>> I am not copying any thing, just looking at a satellite view from google .
oduce detailed maps.
>
>
>On 06/06/2020 01:57, John D. wrote:
>>tunnel looks better than bridge, water is still visible under the layer of
>>bridge, or area, does not hide water.
>>
>>tunnel hides water.
>>
>>>Friday, June 5, 2020 8:43 AM -05:00 f
I am not copying any thing, just looking at a satellite view from google .
it was a ruler.
>Saturday, June 13, 2020 9:40 AM -05:00 from Lester Caine :
>
>On 13/06/2020 15:08, 80hnhtv4agou--- via talk wrote:
>> why are you telling me I can not use google as a map source
I am not copying any thing, just looking at a satellite view from google .
it was a ruler.
>Saturday, June 13, 2020 9:40 AM -05:00 from Lester Caine :
>
>On 13/06/2020 15:08, 80hnhtv4agou--- via talk wrote:
>> why are you telling me I can not use google as a map source
is it just rivers or would that included polygons, river banks, area ?
Saturday, June 13, 2020 11:44 AM -05:00 from Joseph Eisenberg
:
I mostly have mapped in parts of Indonesia where there was no data, and the new
road or river was mapped for the first time.
Usually I try to split roads
>i did that it was 10 feet than someone says it can not be 10 feet a mile or so
>down the road and he is right
>
>so i changed it but it was 10 feet where i was.
>
>>Saturday, June 13, 2020 11:44 AM -05:00 from Joseph Eisenberg <
>>joseph.eisenb...@gmail.com >:
>>
>>I mostly have mapped in
d include using its ruler if the
>purpose of using the ruler is to edit OSM.
>
>[0] 2.d of https://www.google.com/help/terms_maps/
>On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 9:47 AM 80hnhtv4agou--- via Talk-us <
>talk...@openstreetmap.org > wrote:
>>because i was asked to change
d include using its ruler if the
>purpose of using the ruler is to edit OSM.
>
>[0] 2.d of https://www.google.com/help/terms_maps/
>On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 9:47 AM 80hnhtv4agou--- via Talk-us <
>talk-us@openstreetmap.org > wrote:
>>because i was asked to change
ically, with local edits, I put "Local knowledge" as the source. Sounds
>>>>more highbrow than "my eyeballs".
>>>I usually put survey/memory depending on how recent my data is.
>>>>IMO, if somebody is challenging one of your local edits, if they are not
&
ically, with local edits, I put "Local knowledge" as the source. Sounds
>>>>more highbrow than "my eyeballs".
>>>I usually put survey/memory depending on how recent my data is.
>>>>IMO, if somebody is challenging one of your local edits, if they are not
&
;>something that relates to a mapping standard or best practice. Then, learn
>>from your mistakes and move on.
>+1
>>On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 9:32 AM 80hnhtv4agou--- via Talk-us <
>>talk-us@openstreetmap.org > wrote:
>>>this was a tool on the map that measured distanc
;>something that relates to a mapping standard or best practice. Then, learn
>>from your mistakes and move on.
>+1
>>On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 9:32 AM 80hnhtv4agou--- via Talk-us <
>>talk...@openstreetmap.org > wrote:
>>>this was a tool on the map that measured distanc
this was a tool on the map that measured distance.
>Saturday, June 13, 2020 9:29 AM -05:00 from Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-us
>:
>
>You are not allowed to use Google Maps as source.
>
>Have you used Google Maps to edit OSM?
>
>"since all the maps on OSM are old news like in my local area
this was a tool on the map that measured distance.
>Saturday, June 13, 2020 9:29 AM -05:00 from Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-us
>:
>
>You are not allowed to use Google Maps as source.
>
>Have you used Google Maps to edit OSM?
>
>"since all the maps on OSM are old news like in my local area
If you people want me to prove my edit by adding a source, and a person from
the data group as an editor,
asks me to prove it, and i redo my edit and he does not get back to me, why are
you telling me I can not use
google as a map source, since all the maps on OSM are old news. like in my
If you people want me to prove my edit by adding a source, and a person from
the data group as an editor,
asks me to prove it, and i redo my edit and he does not get back to me, why are
you telling me I can not use
google as a map source, since all the maps on OSM are old news. like in my
>I understand fred, how do you know the date of the satelite view, in pre-fab a
>building can go up
>
>in a day.
>>Friday, June 12, 2020 7:24 PM -05:00 from Dave F via talk <
>>talk@openstreetmap.org >:
>>
>>On 12/06/2020 15:32, 80hnhtv4agou--- via
local area is 7 mouths old +, why would
anybody want me to edit in theirs backyard ?
On 12/06/2020 15:32, 80hnhtv4agou--- via talk wrote:> I am confused
>
>>> are you telling me being in chicago, where i can go to the place i am>
>>> editing, not relying on satellite vi
I am confused,
are you telling me being in chicago, where i can go to the place i am editing,
not relying on satellite view
which is behind by at least 7 month or more here, i should be messing around in
London.
>Friday, June 12, 2020 9:26 AM -05:00 from Dave F via talk
>:
>
>On
I should have said, he is obsessed with rivers in this area, and I have
stepped on his toes, but I was going
by the wiki,
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Tag:waterway%3Driverbank#Problems_with_giant_river_multipolygons
>I meant he is a person that is obsessed with his map and that rivers in this
>town are his and not to touch his edits.
>
>
>>Wednesday, June 10, 2020 6:21 PM -05:00 from Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-us <
>>talk...@openstreetmap.org >:
>>
>>I am not a native speaker, but as far as I know
geset: 85357849 comment is "multipolygons for the entire river offer
>>no tangible advantages and not to be used."
>>
>>Sorry but I don't think that is a great comment.
>>Is there any advantage in what you did?
>>If so, what did you do and what are the a
what was done i have had 2
people ask me to explane my
one edit and have me look what i did and correct not jump in and demand.
>Wednesday, June 10, 2020 4:53 PM -05:00 from Andy Townsend < ajt1...@gmail.com
>>:
>
>On 10/06/2020 22:41, 80hnhtv4agou--- via Talk-us wrote:
>
this is a good one because i had a back and forth discussion with somebody that
was
calling me out on my edit because from space this looked like a flat surface
and then explaned
how to list it as non active.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/802256628#map=16/42.1110/-87.8160
but the thing
this is a good one because i had a back and forth discussion with somebody that
was
calling me out on my edit because from space this looked like a flat surface
and then explaned
how to list it as non active.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/802256628#map=16/42.1110/-87.8160
but the thing
Last week I edited a 10 year old, 81 mile MultiPolygon with GHOSTS in the
ID editor, all I know, Someone
took offence to that,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/85357849#map=13/42.0813/-87.8854
and attacked all my edits of that day, and as he moved from north to south,
every
Last week I edited a 10 year old, 81 mile MultiPolygon with GHOSTS in the
ID editor, all I know, Someone
took offence to that,
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/85357849#map=13/42.0813/-87.8854
and attacked all my edits of that day, and as he moved from north to south,
every
i found source-date,
but if i can not on the ground verifies i do not think i should change, they
did not like non gofers
waking around.
>Tuesday, June 9, 2020 5:14 AM -05:00 from Mateusz Konieczny via talk
>:
>
>
>
>
>Jun 9, 2020, 00:26 by t...@openstreetmap.org:
>>just to be safe
i found source-date,
but if i can not on the ground verifies i do not think i should change, they
did not like non gofers
waking around.
>Tuesday, June 9, 2020 5:14 AM -05:00 from Mateusz Konieczny via talk
>:
>
>
>
>
>Jun 9, 2020, 00:26 by talk@openstreetmap.org:
>>just to be safe
this was solved when someone said you can write your own.
>Monday, June 8, 2020 9:35 PM -05:00 from Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com>:
>
>On 9/6/20 12:01 am, 80hnhtv4agou--- via talk wrote:
>> YES !, i guess what i am saying i would like to see more drop down
>> o
just to be safe i went to a pre-edit location, less than 5 miles 2 hours by
public transportation.
the satellite view was wrong, the river area were ponds because of the dam,
which was not there in 1969
when we went down the river in cement tubs, and the golf cart paths were all
marked
just to be safe i went to a pre-edit location, less than 5 miles 2 hours by
public transportation.
the satellite view was wrong, the river area were ponds because of the dam,
which was not there in 1969
when we went down the river in cement tubs, and the golf cart paths were all
marked
hat you have
>selected.
>If you have the stream selected you will be offered tunnel/culvert/layer/etc
>as options.
>If you have the highway selected you will be offered bridge/tunnel/ford/etc.
>
>Is this the reason you are not seeing the options you expect?
>
>On 8 Jun 2020, a
hat you have
>selected.
>If you have the stream selected you will be offered tunnel/culvert/layer/etc
>as options.
>If you have the highway selected you will be offered bridge/tunnel/ford/etc.
>
>Is this the reason you are not seeing the options you expect?
>
>On 8 Jun 2020, at 10
elected you will be offered tunnel/culvert/layer/etc
>as options.
>If you have the highway selected you will be offered bridge/tunnel/ford/etc.
>
>Is this the reason you are not seeing the options you expect?
>
>
> On 8 Jun 2020, at 10:49 pm, 80hnhtv4agou--- via talk <
&
tta
>:
>
>If this is the changeset ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86230442 ),
>where is the discussion?
>Ale
>On 07/06/20 17:33, 80hnhtv4agou--- via talk wrote:
>>86230442
>>>Sunday, June 7, 2020 8:47 AM -05:00 from Dave F via talk <
>>>talk@openstreetma
tta
>:
>
>If this is the changeset ( https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/86230442 ),
>where is the discussion?
>Ale
>On 07/06/20 17:33, 80hnhtv4agou--- via talk wrote:
>>86230442
>>>Sunday, June 7, 2020 8:47 AM -05:00 from Dave F via talk <
>>>t...@openstreetma
>i guss what i am saying, add a tunnel is wrong, when the road is on the
>bridge, and the drop down box
says culvert. again i am only seeing the ID map.
>
>i just tried it, it only says add a tunnel, then river is under bridge.
>
>
>>Monday, June 8, 2020 7:00 AM -05:00 from Mateusz
>in the ID editor, if you draw a stream - river line, and it crosses a road,
>you get a warning, with the suggestion
>
>add a bridge or tunnel.
>
>>Monday, June 8, 2020 5:13 AM -05:00 from Martin Koppenhoefer <
>>dieterdre...@gmail.com >:
>>
>>Am Sa., 6. Juni 2020 um 18:02 Uhr schrieb Dave
>86230442
>>Sunday, June 7, 2020 8:47 AM -05:00 from Dave F via talk <
>>talk@openstreetmap.org >:
>>
>>Provide a link to the changeset.
>>
>>DaveF
>>
>>On 07/06/2020 14:07, 80hnhtv4agou--- via talk wrote:
>>> IF someone, n
IF someone, not local, relying on satellite views, goes after my good faith
edit, based on my on the ground
surveillance thinks my edit was wrong trying to fix broken polygon’s, that are
making ghosts lines on the
ID edit page. sends me a change-set discussion notice, telling me not to
IF someone, not local, relying on satellite views, goes after my good faith
edit, based on my on the ground
surveillance thinks my edit was wrong trying to fix broken polygon’s, that are
making ghosts lines on the
ID edit page. sends me a change-set discussion notice, telling me not to
then why is the picture on top of the bridge when bridge is added.
>Friday, June 5, 2020 8:46 AM -05:00 from Mateusz Konieczny via talk
>:
>
>
>
>
>Jun 5, 2020, 14:45 by talk@openstreetmap.org:
>>if water goes under a bridge, why in the ID editor is it pictured on top of
>>the bridge,
if water goes under a bridge, why in the ID editor is it pictured on top of
the bridge,
when the river stream comes to the bridge can you split and add tunnel ?
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
if water goes under a bridge, why in the ID editor is it pictured on top of
the bridge,
when the river stream comes to the bridge can you split and add tunnel ?
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
then why are there tags ?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Demolished_Railway
and if the platform posts are still there ?
>Tuesday, May 26, 2020 4:52 PM -05:00 from Jack Armstrong
>:
>
>Thanks. I'll try that.
>
>>From: Warin < 61sundow...@gmail.com >
>>
>>Advise them to enter the
i would delete what i did, expanding on someone else edit, but what about
something like a road
that was never built and was mapped 7 years ago, with an edit 1 year ago ?
>Sunday, May 24, 2020 11:39 PM -05:00 from Jack Armstrong
>:
>
>Greetings.
>
>Recently, a user mapped “razed”
it was tagged ( proposed ), and asphalt.
>Monday, May 25, 2020 11:56 AM -05:00 from Mateusz Konieczny via talk
>:
>
>I would say that anyone has right to remove such objects.
>
>I am also unsure what would even be a correct tagging. never_existed:highway=*?
>
>(sole reason for possible
? should a highway never built in 2011, mapped, that goes through a farm still
be there even if tagged
right, and if not who has a right to remove it ?
>Monday, May 25, 2020 10:10 AM -05:00 from Mateusz Konieczny via talk
>:
>
>May 25, 2020, 16:48 by colin.sm...@xs4all.nl:
>>On
water lagoon system, which should
>be mapped with coastline, since it is marine salt-water.
>
>-- Joseph Eisenberg
>On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 7:57 PM 80hnhtv4agou--- via talk <
>talk@openstreetmap.org > wrote:
>>>has a ghosts water multipolygon,
>>>
>
>has a ghosts water multipolygon,
>
>that keep moving over land.
>
>https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Nominatim/Polygons
>
>i can not see the break, and every in the middle is a relation ship.
>
>
___
talk mailing list
>As to a mapping rule, do we node, (the point symbol in ID edit) put signs on
>the map,
>
>and under what authority do we not put signs on the map.
>
>>Saturday, April 25, 2020 7:02 AM -05:00 from Warin < 61sundow...@gmail.com >:
>>
>>On 25/4/20 8:35 pm, Oleksiy Muzalyev wrote:
>>> Here are
if in the ID editor there are points for picnic tables, what about a point tags
as a sign.
>Thursday, April 23, 2020 11:13 PM -05:00 from stevea
>:
>
>Y'know, I might suggest some wiki-reading. Perhaps 80hnhtv4agou takes a look
>at our wiki for leisure=park (messy as it has been) and how
* how do you close out the trace on the map after edit ?
* how do you tag a sign, mall, park, forest, that is name of the place, place
name.
--
___
talk mailing list
150519-1693688.html
>The body below surface, buried underground would be called a "cable room".
>All the best
>François
>Le dim. 19 avr. 2020 à 23:14, 80hnhtv4agou--- via talk <
>talk@openstreetmap.org > a écrit :
>> this is an enclosure just put in the g
1 - 100 of 129 matches
Mail list logo
