tiger is up to date on the web map using the current data i just think he picked the wrong year, also all he got was a white line in his first try. Way: 813726663 Changeset # 89220282
>Monday, August 17, 2020 6:16 PM -05:00 from Mike Thompson ><miketh...@gmail.com>: > >1) Best not to delete and start over as the history will be lost. >2) Do you have an accurate source that has a license that is compatible with >OSM? Could you share a link to it? >3) General observation is that there is a lot of territory that is not >enclosed by any admin level 8 boundary, which in a built up area like this, >seems unusual to me. > >Mike >On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 5:04 PM 80hnhtv4agou--- via Talk-us < >talk-us@openstreetmap.org > wrote: >>this is not the current boundary, could be more than 10 years + old, >> >>can’t the whole relation, #126598, northbrook, be deleted and then put back >>in. >> >>i tried by hand but this is to much to trace. >> >>>Monday, August 17, 2020 4:43 PM -05:00 from Paul Johnson < >>>ba...@ursamundi.org >: >>> >>>On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 4:02 PM 80hnhtv4agou--- via Talk-us < >>>talk-us@openstreetmap.org > wrote: >>>>can somebody who knows how to use Tiger data fix this ? >>> >>>Fix what?? >>>_______________________________________________ >>>Talk-us mailing list >>>Talk-us@openstreetmap.org >>>https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >>Talk-us mailing list >>Talk-us@openstreetmap.org >>https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
