to represent them
as (multi)polygons IMO.
Teemu Koskinen
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
in my neighborhood by moving
them to coincide with the aerial images. In reality they already were in
the correct position as they were drawn from more accurate gps-traces.
Teemu Koskinen
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http
On Sat, 20 Mar 2010 11:50:13 +0200, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 20 March 2010 19:42, Teemu Koskinen teemu.koski...@mbnet.fi wrote:
I wish I had known that the Yahoo aerial images are not rectified, as I
blindly went and corrected all the roads in my neighborhood by moving
with only simple way with a width, a relation would be needed to tell
that you can hop from one way to the other, which is pretty cumbersome.
Also the width of a way can sometimes be so variable, that you would have
to split it in hundreds of pieces, which makes handling it very hard.
Teemu
contain
nulls, to avoid unnecessary nodes.
That way the area would have a direction, and it would be unnecessary to
use ways to indicate the direction in addition to the area.
This of course would need pretty major reworking of the database, editors
and renderers...
Regards Teemu Koskinen
On Wed, 19 Aug 2009 14:26:29 +0300, Erik Johansson e...@kth.se wrote:
Since this version can't be trained to handle white background signs,
I wonder what color are streetname signs around the world?
Netherlands white on blue
Sweden black on white
In Finland: Black on white
Could somebody please revert this changeset:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/2168210
The moving of the nodes across the Atlantic is obviously wrong.
Regards Teemu Koskinen
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http
On Tue, 18 Aug 2009 20:48:03 +0300, andrzej zaborowski balr...@gmail.com
wrote:
2009/8/18 Peter Miller peter.mil...@itoworld.com:
On 18 Aug 2009, at 14:57, Teemu Koskinen wrote:
Could somebody please revert this changeset:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/2168210
The moving
On Tue, 26 May 2009 08:44:54 +0300, Maarten Deen md...@xs4all.nl wrote:
I've searched the wiki and I have used the tag myself, but there seems
to be
no documentation for restriction= ?
How do you tag a restriction on a crossing between a major and a minor
road
where the major road is
On Tue, 26 May 2009 12:55:25 +0300, Richard Fairhurst
rich...@systemed.net wrote:
Teemu Koskinen wrote:
Could somebody revert the node changes in changeset 1315063,
someone accidentally moved big part of Hämeentie (a major street
in Helsinki). There are over a hundred moved nodes
km/h zone
can be followed from that point many kilometers, and the 40 km/h zone
extends tens of roads. There also might be other overlaps between them, or
with other zones.
Regards
Teemu Koskinen
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http
be happy as
they could just use the relation to draw the name, ref etc. of the road
while the data was split because of some other property changes, while
still have the ability to fine grain control for the routers.
Ed
Teemu Koskinen
___
talk
or we could
use some relation to group the pieces together but that too would require
support from the renderers.
Best
Steve
Regards Teemu Koskinen
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 22:25:36 +0300, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
On 23 Apr 2009, at 12:17, Teemu Koskinen wrote:
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 21:34:05 +0300, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
I don't see a clear explanation as to why there is ambiguity if you
don't do turn restrictions
14 matches
Mail list logo
