[OSM-talk] Odp: Re: Old phone line or old power line?
What can I do to stop information from you? I removed it many times in spam but your address seems to be one exception: I get messages again. This is nothing against you as a person or against your content. I see you are from Russia and I really like russian people,have many friends there.I like Russia as well. The reason is: my engagement in OSM is recently less, so I try to read only messages written from less friends. Best regards, Marek Dnia 27 czerwca 2020 21:32 80hnhtv4agou--- via talk talk@openstreetmap.org napisał(a): if you want more information, you have to give more information. Saturday, June 27, 2020 2:23 PM -05:00 from Mike Thompson miketh...@gmail.com: On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 12:21 PM Bryan Housel bhou...@gmail.com wrote: I’d tag as `abandoned:power=minor_line` since you said it is down in places. It is impossible to tell from the picture what its original purpose was, but this doesn’t matter much if you just want to get it mapped. Thanks Brian, I will proceed along those lines. I would still be interested to hear from experts in the utility field as to what the original purpose of the lines were. Since this is in the US, one case assume standard household voltage (given the size of the insulators and the fact that it terminiantes at an old house in ruins), which back in the day was 110. In which case, there would be a considerably percentage voltage drop over the many km distnace this line spans. Mike __ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org lists.openstreetmap.org lists.openstreetmap.org __ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org lists.openstreetmap.org lists.openstreetmap.org ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
[OSM-talk] Odp: Re: highway=* + area=yes vs area:highway=*
We have also mechanism for area routing but, thats true graphs are easier.. Dnia 10 sierpnia 2018 13:52 Tom Pfeifer t.pfei...@computer.org napisał(a): On 10.08.2018 13:20, djakk djakk wrote: No, all highways are areas :) Mapping them as a line is a manual generalization ;) 1., yes. 2., no, it is a mental abstraction, necessary to apply the mathematical graph theory for routing. On 10.08.2018 12:02, Tomasz Wójcik wrote: ... it looks like highway=* + area=yes isnt incorrect, its just not documented. As said before, it was documented already on the area=* page. It might need to be more explicit on the highway pages. tom __ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org lists.openstreetmap.org lists.openstreetmap.org ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
[Talk-GB] Flood in Nepal
Hi guys, here an video from Nepal: www.youtube.com www.youtube.com Help is needed here: tasks.hotosm.org tasks.hotosm.org tasks.hotosm.org tasks.hotosm.org tasks.hotosm.org tasks.hotosm.org tasks.hotosm.org tasks.hotosm.org ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Re: [OSM-talk] Odd edits by rowers2 in Cameroon
Rowers2 is doing a good job, he is a kind of "turbomapper".See this: http://demo.f4map.com/#lat=51.0959006lon=17.0250060zoom=163D model of Wroclaw in Poland, done by rowers2.He makes also many of bug fixes in Poland.Cheers,Marek Dnia 12 listopada 2015 0:29 Jo napisał(a): He has indeed done some good work as well. I removed the 10-15% that wasn't. Jo 2015-11-12 0:19 GMT+01:00 john whelan jwhelan0...@gmail.com:Looking more closely he's dropped in some 24,000 objects in this bit of Cameroon most are useful and legit. I've dropped him a message and hopefully he'll clean up the the data. Thanks John On 11 November 2015 at 18:08, Michał Brzozowski www.ha...@gmail.com wrote:I meant they are purely fictional. He created these rows of buildings to test something, like different 3d attributes or whatever. They shouldn't exist in OSM. The legit ones I refered to are eg. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/341996660 which are just at one corner of your bbox. Michał On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 11:55 PM, Jo winfi...@gmail.com wrote: The buildings are not in Cameroon though. I wrote him a changeset comment: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34368108#map=3/31.80/21.27 Polyglot 2015-11-11 23:49 GMT+01:00 Michał Brzozowski www.ha...@gmail.com: I seem to know why he's doing this and at users:Poland forum he was instructed not to do this. He's testing rendering of OSM-3D in some web maps (f4map?). Feel free to delete it. For the future, use changeset comments first, if you didn't. It his activity persists, go DWG on him. The takeaway is that whoever is he testing against, should offer some testing with our dev database or .osm files. As per point on the second column, these are legit buildings, visible on Bing. Michał On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 11:27 PM, john whelan jwhelan0...@gmail.com wrote: Visible at 7.4396667 7.4711556 15.5891705 15.6047916 There is nothing visible in Bing or Mapbox but that doesn't mean much but the shape and detail of the edits are suspicious to me and they seem to have made a very large number of edits recently in their history. Could someone be nice and take a peek? Thanks John ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] Future Group
Dear Andy, I join to the future working group. I´m sad about this stagnation. I invite you to the next telco after 27.nov.2014 Skype iD: marekOSMPolska Best, Marek Dnia 17 listopada 2014 20:11 Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk napisał(a): After SotM in Birmingham, I was invited to join the OSM Future Group: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Future(page includes a list of members, and a timetable.) and agreed to do so (Indeed, I paid a subscription solely in order to be eligible to do so). That group has not met nor communicated since then. Should we presume the group is defunct, and mark the age accordingly? -- Andy Mabbett @pigsonthewing http://pigsonthewing.org.uk ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] amenity=bicycle_repair_station :::: only 18 so far
Erlangen,Germany,opposite to the central Rathaus ,o) BR, Marek Dnia 15 listopada 2014 12:51 Simon Poole si...@poole.ch napisał(a): Bryce, where are these common? Not something I've seen here (in a wide sense of the word). Simon Am 15.11.2014 02:32, schrieb Bryce Nesbitt: I'd like to encourage people to map bicycle repair stations. There are only 18 in the database right now. Can we double that this week? http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dbicycle_repair_station -- Separately I'm torn if it's better to map operator= for the party responsible or operated_by=. The first form results in many renderings of the name, which is usually not helpful. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] Addresses are a tiny fraction of what we do (was: The world’s best addressable map)
No one does imports without audit of random samples. We do it as well. The percentage of errors checked in tested area corresponds to the average content errors created by OpenStreetMap mappers. Of course, this must be checked each time, if we import data. We should never believe in the quality of whole geodatabase, if we check only the part. Best regards, Marek Dnia 3 listopada 2014 4:38 Russ Nelson nel...@crynwr.com napisał(a): Paweł Marynowski writes: When you make import, people are starting make notes about imprecise data. I would note that, for decades, the best way to get correct information on the Internet has been to post incorrect information. I don't think that has changed, so yeah, let's import data even if its quality is not 100%. -- --my blog is at http://blog.russnelson.com Crynwr supports open source software 521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315-600-8815 Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | Sheepdog ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] Steve's better map
+1.. Dnia 31 października 2014 21:44 Michael Kugelmann michaelk_...@gmx.de napisał(a): Am 31.10.2014 12:56, schrieb Simon Poole: I commented on the better map vision here http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/SimonPoole/diary/25975 .I really recomend to read this blog, very clear words. Thanks Simon! And I also advocate to read the newest blog from Simon: http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/SimonPoole/diary/25977 Best regards, Michael. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] Drones
Sometime I think, it wolud be nice to start with developing of our own aplication for capturing of: 1. Aerial images 2. Terrain model information 3. 3D information about buildings We have enoug knowdlege in the cloud to do it. What we need is one or 2 universities for staering the develepment and (probably) crowd funding for getting it open source. I can write mockup for such solution. BR, Marek Kleciak Dnia 25 lipca 2014 2:24 Clifford Snow napisał(a): On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Jóhannes Birgir Jensson lt;j...@betra.isgt; wrote:I'm curious to know if any OSM groups are currently running their own drones for imagery. In Iceland we have been looking longingly at the eBee https://www.sensefly.com/drones/ebee.html but so far haven't started fundraising for it. Are there similarly sophisticated yet cheaper options around and currently in use? Haven't flown any...yet, but think it has real possibilities to help map. Satellite imagery always seems out of date or cloud covered. Being able to capture new buildings using drones seem like a good fit. I have seen 3D modeling using images taken from quadcopters. The possibilities of what can be done with open source software are pretty amazing. We are going to have a demo of aerial imagery using kits at an upcoming OSM 10th Anniversary event in Seattle. That is weather permitting. Clifford --@osm_seattleosm_seattle.snowandsnow.usOpenStreetMap: Maps with a human touch___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
[OSM-talk] Fwd: Re: Upcoming changes to OpenStreetMap.org website
+1. The same reasons. I woluls suggest adding of helpful links with the collection like: wheelmap.org openfiremap.org opensciencemap.org Best, Marek Dnia 13 listopada 2013 12:15 Christian Quest lt;cqu...@openstreetmap.frgt; napisał(a): +1 ! When I present OSM to local authorities, I usually start with a joke... in OpenStreetMap only one word is right: open street ? whe're not doing only street mapping map ? we're not only making maps Changing OSM's name is way too late, but at least we should have a clear statement about not only streets and not only map(s)... 2013/11/13 rainerU lt;ra...@sfr.frgt; The text OpenStreetMap is a free and editable map of the world maintained by an active community of contributors. has always been on the main page and has never been correct because it repeats one of the main misunderstandings about OSM. Now that this text is the only one on the front page it is time to fix this: OSM is not a map but a database. Rainer ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk -- Christian Quest - OpenStreetMap France Un nouveau serveur pour OSM... http://donate.osm.org/server2013/ ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
