On Wed, 8 Dec 2010 15:58:07 +1000
John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8 December 2010 12:44, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Hi,
John Smith wrote:
Frederik seems to consistently misrepresent the license in this
sort of dishonest fashion,
Well at least I'm not
On 8 December 2010 10:37, Simon Ward si...@bleah.co.uk wrote:
On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 07:58:26PM +0100, Frederik Ramm wrote:
ODbL is not a PD license, so you do not have to be afraid.
The Contributor Terms effectively change the licence.
Frederik seems to consistently misrepresent the license
On 8 December 2010 00:50, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8 December 2010 10:37, Simon Ward si...@bleah.co.uk wrote:
On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 07:58:26PM +0100, Frederik Ramm wrote:
ODbL is not a PD license, so you do not have to be afraid.
The Contributor Terms effectively
On 8 December 2010 11:08, Grant Slater openstreet...@firefishy.com wrote:
Disappointing as ever... [citation needed]
What is disappointing is you can't or won't spend the time to brush up
on the history of the license debate, or when you see a false
statement being made repeatedly and you don't
Hi,
John Smith wrote:
Frederik seems to consistently misrepresent the license in this sort
of dishonest fashion,
Well at least I'm not misrepresenting my identity. I also think that all
imports should be banned, and that John Smith should circumnavigate
Australia in a dinghy in order to
On 8 December 2010 12:44, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Hi,
John Smith wrote:
Frederik seems to consistently misrepresent the license in this sort
of dishonest fashion,
Well at least I'm not misrepresenting my identity. I also think that all
So in other words it's ok to lie to
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 6:58 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Hi,
pec...@gmail.com wrote:
License is fine. It is CT which in fact still allows OSMF to change
data license to any other free license (which could be strip share
alike and attribution requirements) what blocks
7 matches
Mail list logo
