Alex L. Mauer wrote:
(I might not know offhand what psv_directions=no is, since psv is
not a common term around here.[..])
Nor, I think, would most from the US. When I first looked at the
description (public service vehicle) my first thought was emergency
vehicle (police, fire, ambulance).
-
De: Alex S. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
À: talk@openstreetmap.org
Envoyé: Vendredi 27 Juin 2008 13:14:38 GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin / Berne /
Rome / Stockholm / Vienne
Objet: Re: [OSM-talk] [tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (PSV_directions)
Alex L. Mauer wrote:
(I might not know offhand what
On my brainstorming page to improve the access restrictions scheme at
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Proposed_features/Access_restrictions
I was more thinking about a access=twoway or similar tag, so what you
want to do becomes: oneway=yes; psv=twoway
Greetings
Ben
On Friday 27
Hello,
When mapping, I noticed numerous one-way streets for cars have a specific lane
in the opposite direction for buses. The only official way to enter this in
OSM is to create two one-way ways, one for everyone and the other restricted to
buses.
So I proposed adding a PSV_direction tag
Hello,
When mapping, I noticed numerous one-way streets for cars have a specific lane
in the opposite direction for buses. The only official way to enter this in
OSM is to create two one-way ways, one for everyone and the other restricted to
buses.
So I proposed adding a PSV_direction tag
There's still this proposal
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Proposed_features/access:_name_space
which will solve your problem with access:psv:oneway=no
Ben
On Thursday 26 June 2008, Charlie Echo wrote:
Hello,
When mapping, I noticed numerous one-way streets for cars have a
/ Stockholm / Vienne
Objet: Re: [OSM-talk] [tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (PSV_directions)
There's still this proposal
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Proposed_features/access:_name_space
which will solve your problem with access:psv:oneway=no
Ben
On Thursday 26 June 2008
On Thursday 26 June 2008, Charlie Echo wrote:
The proposal you mention is a radical change in the way we would tag.
We would move from tag=value to tag:subtag:subtag=value.
Sure, it's very different to current tagging, but we need to think about
more complex access restrictions.
The proposal
/
Rome / Stockholm / Vienne
Objet: Re: [OSM-talk] [tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (PSV_directions)
On Thursday 26 June 2008, Charlie Echo wrote:
The proposal you mention is a radical change in the way we would tag.
We would move from tag=value to tag:subtag:subtag=value.
Sure, it's very
9 matches
Mail list logo
