The proposal you mention is a radical change in the way we would tag. We would move from tag=value to tag:subtag:subtag=value.
In your example, access:psv:oneway=no could also be access:oneway:psv=no or even psv:access:oneway=no with the same spirit (I mean we can decide to put access first, but the next subtags should be all defined and ordered, or we would have to tolerate mis-order) ----- Mail Original ----- De: "Ben Laenen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> À: [email protected] Cc: "Charlie Echo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Envoyé: Jeudi 26 Juin 2008 14:06:20 GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin / Berne / Rome / Stockholm / Vienne Objet: Re: [OSM-talk] [tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (PSV_directions) There's still this proposal http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Proposed_features/access:_name_space which will solve your problem with access:psv:oneway=no Ben On Thursday 26 June 2008, Charlie Echo wrote: > Hello, > > When mapping, I noticed numerous one-way streets for cars have a > specific lane in the opposite direction for buses. The only > "official" way to enter this in OSM is to create two one-way ways, > one for everyone and the other restricted to buses. So I proposed > adding a PSV_direction tag (which may be merged with the psv tag, > which has some unuseful values). > > The tag would be: psv_direction > The value would be : > - both > - direct_only (which is the direction of the Way, and may be valid > even if cars are authorized in both directions, but busses only in > one direction) - opposite_only > - no (if buses are forbidden in both directions) > > > I'm expecting your Comments with pleasure! > Best, > Charlie Echo > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
