On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 1:54 PM, Emilie Laffray emilie.laff...@gmail.comwrote:
That would mean that Mapnik needs to be checking a secondary field to
determine what to display. If the renderer doesn't do that, you will end up
with a map that is poorer in the end. In your case, that would mean
2009/9/30 Gustav Foseid gust...@gmail.com:
snip
+1
I fail to see any disadvantages of using landuse=farm + farm=orchard (or
something similar). Waisting a few bits in a database is simply not a
problem.
If you pre-process the information, eg osm2pgsql drops the type of
farm use into the
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 8:28 AM, Gustav Foseid gust...@gmail.com wrote:
If using farm as a base tag (or forest), you will make sure that thos not
interested in the details, still can use the data. To me that is a very
clear advantage.
You have two choices: Let those interested in detail check
Am 28.09.2009 20:40, Pieren:
Hi all,
This is not my proposal but this tag is used by the Corine Land Cover
current import in France corresponding to the class 2.2.2 of this
european program (Agricultural areas - Permanent crops - Fruit trees
and berry plantations).
I would like to push
2009/9/29 Claudius claudiu...@gmx.de:
Am 28.09.2009 20:40, Pieren:
Hi all,
This is not my proposal but this tag is used by the Corine Land Cover
current import in France corresponding to the class 2.2.2 of this
european program (Agricultural areas - Permanent crops - Fruit trees
and berry
2009/9/29 Peter Childs pchi...@bcs.org:
While some farmers may rotate their land, partially with Orchards this
is not as likely as with grassland and ploughed Fields
+1
I'd also like to see differentiation of conventional orchards and
meadow orchards (de:Streuobstwiese). See Wikipedia:en for
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 12:43 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/9/29 Peter Childs pchi...@bcs.org:
I'd also like to see differentiation of conventional orchards and
meadow orchards (de:Streuobstwiese). See Wikipedia:en for details in
English.
Please add your comments
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 12:12 PM, Claudius claudiu...@gmx.de wrote:
I'd rather like to see this merged into some more generic
landuse=agricultural
tagging-scheme. Which would cover general farmland (currently tagged
as landuse=farmland) as well. Any farmer within the OSM crowd that could
[mailto:pchi...@bcs.org]
Sent: 29 September 2009 11:24
Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] [tagging] Feature Proposal - landuse=orchard
2009/9/29 Claudius claudiu...@gmx.de:
Am 28.09.2009 20:40, Pieren:
Hi all,
This is not my proposal but this tag is used by the Corine
Land
2009/9/29 Mike Harris mik...@googlemail.com:
Landuse=agricultural vs. Landuse=grassland
And for the former:
Agriculture=arable / pastoral / orchard / plantation
This seems saner, that way if you aren't sure of the land use due to
time of year the aerial imagery was take or what not you can
2009/9/29 Claudius Henrichs claudiu...@gmx.de
No, I rather meant
landuse=agricultural
+
agricultural=orchard/field/crop/salt
and thus keeping the information but in the same time grouping agricultural
landuses under one tag.
That would mean that Mapnik needs to be checking a secondary
2009/9/29 Emilie Laffray emilie.laff...@gmail.com:
That would mean that Mapnik needs to be checking a secondary field to
determine what to display. If the renderer doesn't do that, you will end up
with a map that is poorer in the end. In your case, that would mean
increasing the size of the
2009/9/29 Pieren pier...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 12:43 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/9/29 Peter Childs pchi...@bcs.org:
I'd also like to see differentiation of conventional orchards and
meadow orchards (de:Streuobstwiese). See Wikipedia:en for details
Emilie Laffray wrote:
That would mean that Mapnik needs to be checking a secondary field to
determine what to display. If the renderer doesn't do that, you will end
up with a map that is poorer in the end. In your case, that would mean
That's not really so different as highway + access, or
Hi all,
This is not my proposal but this tag is used by the Corine Land Cover
current import in France corresponding to the class 2.2.2 of this
european program (Agricultural areas - Permanent crops - Fruit trees
and berry plantations).
I would like to push this for improvements and a proper
15 matches
Mail list logo
