On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 6:39 PM, SteveC [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However, this is not the place for that argument. That argument's
place is the legal-talk mailing list.
Which makes me wonder why you posted the poll here then?
It was your idea - as you said, only asking the legal-talk mailing
El Lunes, 3 de Noviembre de 2008, Joseph Gentle escribió:
The public domain will benefit OSM.
Could we stop making PD-vs-SA flamewars that will lead nowhere, please?
Thanks,
--
--
Iván Sánchez Ortega [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Un ordenador no es un televisor ni un
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 7:59 AM, Joseph Gentle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The public domain will benefit OSM.
What incentive would anyone have to add datasets to OSM if it were PD?
Surely it would be easier and less risky for them to keep their own
work in a separate database and combine it with
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 10:09 AM, OJ W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 7:59 AM, Joseph Gentle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The public domain will benefit OSM.
What incentive would anyone have to add datasets to OSM if it were PD?
Surely it would be easier and less risky for them
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 9:24 AM, Erik Johansson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 8:59 AM, Joseph Gentle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 6:39 PM, SteveC [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the only way you
will be happy and viral people will be happy is with parallel
On Monday 03 November 2008 01:09:41 pm SteveC wrote:
Can't you guys think more than 5 minutes ahead and realise the only
way you will be happy and viral people will be happy is with parallel
projects? That way us viral people will just take all your work and
always have a better map.
public domain will benefit OSM.
Why not, make a list of all people who want public domain, then
download the 16GBs of planet dumps and diffs necessary to get all
history. Analyze all history; extracting the nodes and ways that are
How for example?
Way # 12564789654321
History
* Edited by
Phooee, all these lists to choose from. Probably most sensible on
legal-talk, I think (so followups to there).
Erik Johansson wrote:
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 10:35 AM, maning sambale
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You didn't read the whole sentence:
ways that are contributed PD only,
Of course
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 10:35 AM, maning sambale
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
public domain will benefit OSM.
Why not, make a list of all people who want public domain, then
download the 16GBs of planet dumps and diffs necessary to get all
history. Analyze all history; extracting the nodes and
On 3 Nov 2008, at 00:12, Iván Sánchez Ortega wrote:
El Lunes, 3 de Noviembre de 2008, Joseph Gentle escribió:
The public domain will benefit OSM.
Could we stop making PD-vs-SA flamewars that will lead nowhere,
please?
On 3 Nov 2008, at 02:09, Joseph Gentle wrote:
2008/11/3 Iván Sánchez Ortega [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Could we stop making PD-vs-SA flamewars that will lead nowhere,
please?
Thanks,
I'm sorry for reigniting the flamewar. My intention was merely to get
some data. However, I'd rather have some
2008/11/3 OJ W [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 7:59 AM, Joseph Gentle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The public domain will benefit OSM.
What incentive would anyone have to add datasets to OSM if it were PD?
Surely it would be easier and less risky for them to keep their own
work in a
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:talk-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joseph Gentle
Sent: 03 November 2008 10:10
To: Iván Sánchez Ortega
Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] A super quick poll
2008/11/3 Iván Sánchez Ortega [EMAIL PROTECTED
SteveC steve at asklater.com writes:
Can't you guys think more than 5 minutes ahead and realise the only
way you will be happy and viral people will be happy is with parallel
projects? That way us viral people will just take all your work and
always have a better map.
Exactly. I mean
2008/11/3 Iván Sánchez Ortega [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Could we stop making PD-vs-SA flamewars that will lead nowhere, please?
Thanks,
I'm sorry for reigniting the flamewar. My intention was merely to get
some data. However, I'd rather have some argument here than Steve's
inflammatory remarks
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 9:31 AM, Dave Stubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On the license note ffs guys, legal-talk-general i believe,
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-general
It's an entire mailing list set up so this un-resolvable (to a large
extent) discussion can be kept away from
Whats important to you? Please answer this ~20 second poll:
http://sineltor.selfip.org/osm.php
Thanks!
Joseph
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
You should rotate the options randomly and also try some of the
consequences in the question also
a) Would you like OSM to always be inferior to TeleAtlas and Navteq
and probably die (PD license)
b) Would you like OSM to be the best map on the planet (viral license))
c) This requires more
Steve:
I disagree with your opinion. So do _many_ others.
I think OSM would be vastly improved by being more open and free. I
think our maps would be improved with more mapping and less lawyering.
However, this is not the place for that argument. That argument's
place is the legal-talk mailing
On 2 Nov 2008, at 23:35, Joseph Gentle wrote:
Steve:
I disagree with your opinion. So do _many_ others.
and so _many_ others disagree with you
I think OSM would be vastly improved by being more open and free. I
think our maps would be improved with more mapping and less lawyering.
Under
20 matches
Mail list logo
