The tag oneway=true is extinct in the database.
Without defending the author of the Craigslist stylesheet: tracking OSM
data changes is hard.
In part due to the negative attitude towards cleanup mechanical edits, the
data is all over the place.
1, -1, reverse, true, false, no, yes, maybe.
just a few thoughts:
What is the value of a 1 time mechanical edit cleanup ? From the moment you
ran your script, new data can arrive in the OSM with the wrong values.
Will you run your script daily ? What if a data consumer obtains the data
between 2 runs of your script ?
Wouldn't it be better
2015-06-01 9:55 GMT+02:00 Marc Gemis marc.ge...@gmail.com:
Part of that work could be (or is) done by the validators in the editors.
+1
If you look at the actual values for oneway, very few are obviously
mistagged, e.g. oneway=yes;no (32) and no;yes (111) - these result very
likely from
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 12:55 AM, Marc Gemis marc.ge...@gmail.com wrote:
just a few thoughts:
What is the value of a 1 time mechanical edit cleanup ? From the moment
you ran your script, new data can arrive in the OSM with the wrong values.
Will you run your script daily ? What if a data
Yeah, I noticed this about the Craigslist rendering a while ago. In my case
it was ways tagged as oneway=-1. Since the ways were not members of any
relations and there was no other reason for them to be tagged this way, I
reversed the way directions and changed the tag to oneway=yes but obviously
Yes, I would class this as a rendering error on Craigslist's part, not a
data error on OSM's part. It sounds like the code is checking for the
presence of the oneway tag, where it should be checking for the presence of
oneway=yes.
--
John F. Eldredge -- j...@jfeldredge.com
Darkness cannot
On 1/06/2015 6:42 AM, John Eldredge wrote:
Yes, I would class this as a rendering error on Craigslist's part, not
a data error on OSM's part. It sounds like the code is checking for
the presence of the oneway tag, where it should be checking for the
presence of oneway=yes.
Or oneway=1,
Warin 61sundowner at gmail.com writes:
Or oneway=1, -1 reverse, true,
reversible
The tag oneway=true is extinct in the
database.
--
Andrew
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
After a long stretch of oneway=yes, I might indeed tag oneway=no
just to keep someone from assuming I'd made a mistake. oneway=no is a
declaration,
as opposed to a lack of information.
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
On Sun, 2015-05-31 at 07:56 +0200, Marc Gemis wrote:
I've seen this topic being discussed here or elsewhere in the past. I
thought that the consensus was that in some area's (a Spanish town I
believe), it was ok to leave the oneway=no. The reasoning was that
most streets in that town were
Forgot reply to list :(
On 31/05/15 01:51, Mike Thompson wrote:
Why care? I would imagine to the majority of the users make no
distinction between OpenStreetMap and Craigslist's rendering of
OpenStreetMap, if the map is wrong, to them that simply means that
OpenStreetMap is wrong.
There are
Mike Thompson miketho16 at gmail.com writes:
The issue is that some streets that are not one way in OSM data, are
rendered as one way by Craigslist.
If you go to this ad and zoom in on the map you will see the arrows
designating one way streets, for example on Cliffrose Way
On 31/05/15 12:24, Andrew Hain wrote:
Does Craigslist also get oneway=-1 (traffic opposite to the direction of the
way) wrong?
And oneway:cycle=no and the like ...
--
Lester Caine - G8HFL
-
Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact
L.S.Caine Electronic
I have posted this issue to the Craigslist feedback forum, but I also
thought I would post it here to see if anyone has a specific contact at
Cragislist that handles their map rendering. They use - and credit -
OpenStreetMap (which is wonderful), but I believe they perform their own
custom
On 31/05/2015 10:51 AM, Mike Thompson wrote:
I have posted this issue to the Craigslist feedback forum, but I also
thought I would post it here to see if anyone has a specific contact
at Cragislist that handles their map rendering. They use - and credit
- OpenStreetMap (which is wonderful),
I've seen this topic being discussed here or elsewhere in the past. I
thought that the consensus was that in some area's (a Spanish town I
believe), it was ok to leave the oneway=no. The reasoning was that most
streets in that town were oneway=yes, and the oneway=no was used to
indicate that this
16 matches
Mail list logo
