As I read your proposal, it sounds like you have a solution but haven't
defined the problem. If you could focus on the problem and describe exactly
what is wrong with the current arrangement, and what will happen if we do
nothing, that might help. Otherwise I can not see the merits of your
sent from a phone
> On 9. Aug 2020, at 21:16, john whelan wrote:
>
> And different features really are called difference things in different
> countries.
+1, moreover, the „same“ features are different in different countries and
cultures, and it is part of our work to define when we
sent from a phone
> On 9. Aug 2020, at 21:04, pangoSE wrote:
>
> E.g. permanent unique ids, talk pages if we want that for every osmid, SPARQL
> support, standardization benefits "riding the current ride in open data"
somehow you can have this already through the integration of wikidata:
"riding the current ride in open data" - I am confused what is the meaning of
that
"scripting support for botmakers" - as a bot operator and a bot author I am
confused what is
supposed to be missing
"support for references and linking interactively to other data sources" - we
have that,
see
I honestly can't see any benefit. Splitting the data into two places adds
the danger of it getting out of sync.
Standard naming conventions would be nice but defining the standard name is
practically impossible. Compare taginfo to the map features wiki page.
One problem with map features is
Could you reply with your arguments in favor of the current one2one tag model
system in the other thread where I listed the benefits as I see them?
E.g. permanent unique ids, talk pages if we want that for every osmid, SPARQL
support, standardization benefits "riding the current ride in open
It still fails to provide even a single benefit over the current situation.
Aug 9, 2020, 20:11 by pang...@riseup.net:
>
>
>
> Originalmeddelande
> Från: pangoSE
> Skickat: 9 augusti 2020 15:40:41 CEST
> Till: talk@openstreetmap.org
> Ämne: Re: [OSM-talk] Roadmap for
Originalmeddelande
Från: pangoSE
Skickat: 9 augusti 2020 15:40:41 CEST
Till: talk@openstreetmap.org
Ämne: Re: [OSM-talk] Roadmap for deprecation of name tags in OSM
This is another good reason to abandon this suggestion in favor of our own
wikibase instance.
Philip Barnes
This was meant for the list.
Originalmeddelande
Från: pangoSE
Skickat: 9 augusti 2020 11:09:08 CEST
Till: Mateusz Konieczny
Ämne: Re: [OSM-talk] Roadmap for deprecation of name tags in OSM
Hi
Thanks for the response.
Mateusz Konieczny via talk skrev: (9 augusti 2020
9 matches
Mail list logo
