Re: [OSM-talk] Fwd: Re[2]: Tag:manhole=telecom

2020-04-19 Thread François Lacombe
Given problem is you argue with pictures showing what is under the cap. On the tag page picture - and on the ground - we can't say what is under and if a man can't get down a ladder into a room. I think all this stuff would require a formal proposal to discuss about vocabulary and have opinions

Re: [OSM-talk] Fwd: Re[2]: Tag:manhole=telecom

2020-04-19 Thread 80hnhtv4agou--- via talk
I am trying to say the tag page is wrong, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:manhole=telecom the picture is a fiber optics splice enclosure not a manhole https://www.multicominc.com/product/pencell-pem-2436-24x36x24-buried-cable-enclosure/

Re: [OSM-talk] Fwd: Re[2]: Tag:manhole=telecom

2020-04-19 Thread François Lacombe
To me, manhole applies in the two situations. We should make a distinction between the "cap" visible from the surface and the facility underground. Same shape of "cap" (I call it the manhole actually) can hide really different kind of stuff underground you won't be able to define without removing

[OSM-talk] Fwd: Re[2]: Tag:manhole=telecom

2020-04-19 Thread 80hnhtv4agou--- via talk
 this is an enclosure  just put in the ground, level 3 fiber. https://s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/mapillary.private.images/4KIBU1qe2CfjtcKtPHegeg/uploaded.jpg?AWSAccessKeyId=AKIAR47SN3BMII5SHG7V=1587328637=8%2FzNiW16zbU9FjWy0JD17cNwIns%3D