Martijn van Oosterhout schrieb:
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 8:47 PM, sylvain letuffe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, I know there are strong oppositions on this list to that way of doing,
some guys that have the power by the fact they own the renderer might be
unappy of changes they have to do on
Nathan wrote:
Maybe the answer is to modify the map features table
and add columns for mapnik, osmarender, cyclemap, etc.
Maybe getting rid of the generic rendering column and
making it rendering for each of the viewers. What
do you think?
If someone does modify Map Features to add
If someone does modify Map Features to add extra columns to the
tables then the perl script which automatically parses the page to
highlight the Not in Map Features items in the Maplint layer will
also need amending.
Whaou, I wasn't aware of that ! Doesn't it looks like a bit strange that a
Since there is a maybe need wouldn't it be a good idea (or
maybe someone
allready does ?) to create an xml version of the map feature ?
That is sort of what the perl script does, or tries to, I think.
Once it has the XML file the program can see whether a given feature
is in that file or not.
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 2:54 AM, Nathan Mixter
The Map Features is edited manually, means that we have to accept the
fact that the list of all key/values supported by all OSM applications
will never be complet and up-to-date in this wiki page.
Map Features is a great page and very usefull for
Ulf Lamping wrote:
Come on. There is no the renderer, you can set up your own if you
like. Anyone can.
Of course, I could climb on the top of the mount everest - in theory.
In practise I would need a lot of time to learn how to do that.
Yes so what? I learned how osmarender styles worked
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 3:46 PM, Andy Allan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
in that case we better find
another solution which can tell what tags programs will try to support.
Actually, a page like map features which documented such things would
be good. But the current craze on the wiki is to
I wish we could have a wiki page that describes tags which are supported by
at least one of the major renderers (main mapnik, osmarender, cyclemap)
A column in the map feature saying which renderer is using it ?
generally not rendered
(path).
osmarender does
As it is now, I think map
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 8:47 PM, sylvain letuffe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, I know there are strong oppositions on this list to that way of doing,
some guys that have the power by the fact they own the renderer might be
unappy of changes they have to do on their styles and software and I
Maybe the answer is to modify the map features table and add columns for
mapnik, osmarender,
cyclemap, etc. Maybe getting rid of the generic rendering column and making it
rendering for each of the viewers. What do you think?
I think there is a wysiwyg media wiki plugin that might make
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 2:28 PM, Johnny Rose Carlsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andy Allan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Isn't there a description of highway=path on Map
Features page?
Ahahahahahahaha. So what?
Are you saying Map Features is useless?, in that case we better find
another
Hi,
Igor Brejc wrote:
Anyway, I checked Tagwatch for Germany and it has
some 17,000 paths, so it's not totally unused.
I checked a random sample. Of 10 highway=path objects I checked, 8 had
been highway=footway before someone decided to change it. One was a
highway=residential before. One
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 2:28 PM, Johnny Rose Carlsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andy Allan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Isn't there a description of highway=path on Map
Features page?
Ahahahahahahaha. So what?
Are you saying Map Features is useless?
No, it's not useless. But there's no point
Andy Allan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Isn't there a description of highway=path on Map
Features page?
Ahahahahahahaha. So what?
Are you saying Map Features is useless?, in that case we better find
another solution which can tell what tags programs will try to support.
Best regards,
-
Hello,
This question has come up several times (from what I could Google out),
but let me ask it again: when can we expect Mapnik OSM layer to render
highway=path? Nevermind the path or footway debate - it would be nice
to have paths rendered (they can be rendered the same as footways, as
far
Igor Brejc wrote:
This question has come up several times (from what I could Google out),
but let me ask it again: when can we expect Mapnik OSM layer to render
highway=path? Nevermind the path or footway debate - it would be nice
to have paths rendered (they can be rendered the same as
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Igor Brejc
Sent: 03 November 2008 16:14
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [OSM-talk] Mapnik rendering of paths + place=locality in
general
Hello,
This question has come up several times (from what I could Google out),
but let me ask it again: when can we
Tom Hughes wrote:
Igor Brejc wrote:
This question has come up several times (from what I could Google
out), but let me ask it again: when can we expect Mapnik OSM layer to
render highway=path? Nevermind the path or footway debate - it
would be nice to have paths rendered (they can be
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 4:49 PM, Igor Brejc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Aren't we constantly reiterating the fact that tagging is
democratic?
I think democratic is the wrong word. You can do what you like.
There's no tyranny of the masses, for a start - minorities and
majorities are both on equal
19 matches
Mail list logo
