On Tue, 12 Jan 2016 11:45:43 +1100,
Warin wrote:
> On 12/01/2016 11:22 AM, Mike Thompson wrote:
> > I notice that some times just the part of a parking lot where cars
> > may park is mapped [1]. In other cases the entire lot, including
> > the lanes between rows of cars, has been mapped [2]. The
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 6:22 PM, Mike Thompson wrote:
> I notice that some times just the part of a parking lot where cars may
> park is mapped [1]. In other cases the entire lot, including the lanes
> between rows of cars, has been mapped [2].
>
I find the latter to be
When i have time, i also add the ways in the parking lots, mostly because i
know that here at telenav it`s generating a lot of false positive missing
roads, that are in fact parking ways.
The algorithm can filter somehow between missing roads and parking lots,
based on the speed, but better, if i
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 4:08 AM, Badita Florin
wrote:
> When i have time, i also add the ways in the parking lots, mostly because
> i know that here at telenav it`s generating a lot of false positive missing
> roads, that are in fact parking ways.
> The algorithm can
sent from a phone
> Am 12.01.2016 um 01:22 schrieb Mike Thompson :
>
> I notice that some times just the part of a parking lot where cars may park
> is mapped [1]. In other cases the entire lot, including the lanes between
> rows of cars, has been mapped [2]. The wiki
On 12/01/2016 11:22 AM, Mike Thompson wrote:
I notice that some times just the part of a parking lot where cars may
park is mapped [1]. In other cases the entire lot, including the lanes
between rows of cars, has been mapped [2]. The wiki [3] doesn't
specify which is preferred, but seems to
I notice that some times just the part of a parking lot where cars may park
is mapped [1]. In other cases the entire lot, including the lanes between
rows of cars, has been mapped [2]. The wiki [3] doesn't specify which is
preferred, but seems to suggest [2] is better. What do you think?
Mike
7 matches
Mail list logo