Lars
I think this is all sorted out now. Let me know if you suspect any other
discrepancies.
80n
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 8:39 PM, Lars Aronsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
80n wrote:
Lars
Can you point to a couple of specific instances please so that I can
investigate further?
If you
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 1:43 AM, 80n [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 12:46 AM, Jon Burgess [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sat, 2008-03-15 at 00:30 +, 80n wrote:
Lars
Thanks for this info, its been very useful.
Some edits, that were made during the period when
On Sat, 2008-03-15 at 07:31 +, 80n wrote:
On further inspection, what I said above is complete rubbish. The
timestamp format difference is between the the planet dump and the API
not Osmosis:
Planet dump:
node id=2 lat=50.1360074 lon=8.3023717
timestamp=2007-10-04T18:28:37Z
Karl Newman wrote:
This is probably due to the recently broken (and now fixed)
daily/hourly diffs. After this week's planet dump is imported
(probably today), the hourly diffs should be able to properly
keep it up to date as the wiki page states.
Yes, it's much better now. But it's not
Lars
Can you point to a couple of specific instances please so that I can
investigate further?
Osmxapi was resynchronized against this week's planet file (
planet-080312.osm) plus the diff files from then onwards. So if there are
still discrepancies all the evidence is still be available at the
80n wrote:
Lars
Can you point to a couple of specific instances please so that I can
investigate further?
If you try this very narrow region,
wget
'http://www.informationfreeway.org/api/0.5/way[bbox=14.4,58.05,14.6,58.1][note=FIXME
previously unwayed segment]' -O mymap.osm
You will get a
Lars
Thanks for this info, its been very useful.
Some edits, that were made during the period when the incremental feeds were
down, have not been resynchronized correctly.
The problem is due to a difference in the timestamp format between the
planet dump and the incremental feeds.
I'll fix the
On Sat, 2008-03-15 at 00:30 +, 80n wrote:
Lars
Thanks for this info, its been very useful.
Some edits, that were made during the period when the incremental
feeds were down, have not been resynchronized correctly.
The problem is due to a difference in the timestamp format between the
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 5:26 AM, Karl Newman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 9:30 PM, Lars Aronsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Today I learned about [[Osmxapi]] and found it really useful for
digging out ways tagged with FIXME. However, on the wiki page it
says the data
Today I learned about [[Osmxapi]] and found it really useful for
digging out ways tagged with FIXME. However, on the wiki page it
says the data is never more than about 2 hours old and this
clearly doesn't hold, as I got data from InformationFreeway that
was changed in OSM many days ago.
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 9:30 PM, Lars Aronsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Today I learned about [[Osmxapi]] and found it really useful for
digging out ways tagged with FIXME. However, on the wiki page it
says the data is never more than about 2 hours old and this
clearly doesn't hold, as I
11 matches
Mail list logo