Re: [OSM-talk] Revert of changeset
> He replied and acknowledges he has done some damage, though most of his > actions tackled the problem of 2-7 duplicate imports of the sama data at > the same point. > > However, he said he will not touch the data in the US in the future, to > avoid further damage and redirect his energy in more productive things. > > I think this resolves the issue for you. > > Thanks Roland. The issue is not yet resolved though. What is the plan to fix the data now? I listed a few errors in a previous email but when I see the size of the changeset there might be other as well. Can he fix this or can someone cancel his changes altogetehr? Thanks in adavance, N. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] Revert of changeset
Am Samstag, den 05.06.2010, 10:40 +0200 schrieb Roland Ramthun: > Am Freitag, den 04.06.2010, 18:45 -0500 schrieb Ian Dees: > > It appears that User:grossing > > (http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/grossing/edits) sporadically > > removes TIGER node duplicates throughout the US. > > > > > > I thought we had decided *not* to do this without careful inspection? > > Can someone with better German than I try to explain to him why what > > he's doing is a bad thing? He replied and acknowledges he has done some damage, though most of his actions tackled the problem of 2-7 duplicate imports of the sama data at the same point. However, he said he will not touch the data in the US in the future, to avoid further damage and redirect his energy in more productive things. I think this resolves the issue for you. Regards, Roland ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] Revert of changeset
Am Freitag, den 04.06.2010, 18:45 -0500 schrieb Ian Dees: > It appears that User:grossing > (http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/grossing/edits) sporadically > removes TIGER node duplicates throughout the US. > > > I thought we had decided *not* to do this without careful inspection? > Can someone with better German than I try to explain to him why what > he's doing is a bad thing? Sure, done. Regards, Roland ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Re: [OSM-talk] Revert of changeset
It appears that User:grossing ( http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/grossing/edits) sporadically removes TIGER node duplicates throughout the US. I thought we had decided *not* to do this without careful inspection? Can someone with better German than I try to explain to him why what he's doing is a bad thing? On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 6:10 PM, Nakor wrote: > Hello, > > Could somebody please revert changeset #4845372 or point out how I can > do it? Since one week I have been finding countless errors coming from > it. To show a few examples: > > * linking a road and a railway at > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/62417120 when there actually is > a bridge > * removing nodes from road, actually truncating the road: > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/8733179 > * connecting river and roads when there are bridges/tunnels > * ... > > I contacted the user but did not hear back from them so far. > > Thanks, > > N. > > ___ > talk mailing list > talk@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk > ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
[OSM-talk] Revert of changeset
Hello, Could somebody please revert changeset #4845372 or point out how I can do it? Since one week I have been finding countless errors coming from it. To show a few examples: * linking a road and a railway at http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/62417120 when there actually is a bridge * removing nodes from road, actually truncating the road: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/8733179 * connecting river and roads when there are bridges/tunnels * ... I contacted the user but did not hear back from them so far. Thanks, N. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
