Such topics are curently discussed during the voting of a power tagging
proposal on the wiki.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Power_supports_refinement
Have a look to the voting section.
As I understand, renders is A (out of plenty) way to look at the data.
It sounds very
Am 18.05.2015 um 00:44 schrieb Paul Norman penor...@mac.com:
Tiles@home was not a P2P map style, it was kept in SVN and used a distributed
rendering system. Distributed rendering is still used, primarily by larger
scale operations.
yes, but because there were no or few authorities to
On 18/05/2015, Daniel Koć daniel@koć.pl wrote:
I think the mission will be accomplished once we have it integrated with
OSM website somehow, just like we did with routing: there were already a
few routing services using our data, so we may not care, but for average
user they were just not
W dniu 18.05.2015 0:44, Paul Norman napisał(a):
I am not certain of the details after this long, but I don't think the
Tiles@home rendering was P2P either - simply distributed.
You're probably right! =} I just focused on how distributed platform
could be even more distributed in the future.
Am 17.05.2015 um 21:36 schrieb Daniel Koć:
.
I also don't think we should let anybody do anything on default map,
however the general idea is good if we split the problem:
1. We should have some tools to let people render their own style, no
matter how crazy. It's possible of course from
W dniu 17.05.2015 22:22, moltonel 3x Combo napisał(a):
Did you even try the existing tools ? Tilemilll is very userfriendly,
and if Joe or Jane has trouble setting it up, they can just use the
MapBox instance. There's very little skill needed to start tweaking an
existing style, and the
W dniu 17.05.2015 23:47, Simon Poole napisał(a):
Showing your favourite objects on a map with uMap is reasonably easy
and in the mean time something fairly popular even with people without
a
deep technical background.
I've heard about it lately and I like it. Great tool, but - how one
On 5/17/2015 3:14 PM, Daniel Koć wrote:
I have no idea how you'd apply P2P to map style design. It sounds like
you; ve heard of a great technology, and want to apply it to every
problem without fully understanding the technology and/or the problem.
I even used it once on OSM - it was called
On 17/05/2015, Daniel Koć daniel@koć.pl wrote:
1. We should have some tools to let people render their own style, no
matter how crazy. It's possible of course from the technical point of
view (the data and tools are available and the licenses are open), but
that is far too complicated for
W dniu 16.05.2015 1:57, Rob Nickerson napisał(a):
The people behind the default map render have put a lot of work in to
trying to develop a map style which works well for the average OSM
mapper. To have anyone come along and add their own styling for any
map feature they like would be chaos.
I don't know whether this has been discussed or even mooted before...
Tagging for the renderer is natural. Mappers, especially newbies will be
disappointed their pet new feature they've just added to the db does not
appear on the map. This situation is no use to anyone but has been allowed
to
Of course the editors don't render EVERYTHING. Depending on the kind of
work I want to focus on, I'm switching MapCSS styles and filters on and off
in JOSM all the time.
bicycle routes
walking itineraries
public transport routes
addresses
turn lanes
traffic signs
HOT validation
speed limits
It's
when a mapper invents something new, they can add tags for
colour, opacity, line colour, line width, line opacity - for areas and
similar attributes for lines and points (colour, opacity, size etc.) and
obviously tags for name and description etc. What do people think to this ?
The people behind
On 16 May 2015 at 00:57, Rob Nickerson rob.j.nicker...@gmail.com wrote:
when a mapper invents something new, they can add tags for
colour, opacity, line colour, line width, line opacity - for areas and
similar attributes for lines and points (colour, opacity, size etc.) and
obviously tags for
14 matches
Mail list logo