sent from a phone
> On 23. Mar 2018, at 19:42, François Lacombe wrote:
>
> Mixing waterways and culverts or gates in the same list isn't so clear.
it is not mixing (or should not) waterways and culverts. The culvert property
is for stating that a waterway runs
There are many way of thinking about this.
Mixing waterways and culverts or gates in the same list isn't so clear.
If I want to know which are the possible waterways I can map, it's not a
concern they can be under a culvert or through a gate.
The point is to give essential features and let
2018-03-23 17:58 GMT+01:00 Martin Koppenhoefer :
> 2018-03-23 17:01 GMT+01:00 François Lacombe :
>
>>
>> One additional issue is the "additional attributes for waterways" in the
>> feature table here :
2018-03-23 17:01 GMT+01:00 François Lacombe :
>
> One additional issue is the "additional attributes for waterways" in the
> feature table here : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:waterway
> It's not a good idea to put attributes in the feature table since they
Hi Martin,
Understood, I won't merge the overview page, and will only move stuff
between two page as to remove redundancies.
One additional issue is the "additional attributes for waterways" in the
feature table here : https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:waterway
It's not a good idea to put
2018-03-23 15:45 GMT+01:00 François Lacombe :
> Hi,
>
> I'm currently thinking about wiki improvement about waterways.
>
> It would be great to move (with caution) the content of the Waterways page
> to Key:waterway
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:waterway
>
Hi,
I'm currently thinking about wiki improvement about waterways.
It would be great to move (with caution) the content of the Waterways page
to Key:waterway
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:waterway
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Waterways
This would prevent redundancy and ease
7 matches
Mail list logo