On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 10:24:06AM +0100, David Earl wrote:
And I think the previous point about other alphabets is a red herring
too: basically no letter can precede all other letters in whatever
alphabet. If there's ambiguity in the alphabet due to the glyph
The problem is as follows:
The problem is as follows:
You see an interpolation 25a to 25c. How do you know that this means
25a, 25b, 25c? You know by removing the number and then starting with
the a go through code points adding one until you reach c. Easy.
This will work for all alphabets where that are layed out in
The problem is as follows:
You see an interpolation 25a to 25c. How do you know that this means
25a, 25b, 25c? You know by removing the number and then starting with
the a go through code points adding one until you reach c. Easy.
This will work for all alphabets where that are layed out in
On Fri, Oct 02, 2009 at 10:26:11AM +0200, Peter Körner wrote:
The problem is as follows:
You see an interpolation 25a to 25c. How do you know that this means
25a, 25b, 25c? You know by removing the number and then starting with
the a go through code points adding one until you reach c. Easy.
2009/10/2 Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org:
No. The interpolation way has less nodes in it than houses. Thats the whole
point of having an interpolation way. Otherwise you'd just use those nodes
and tag them with the right house numbers and you are done.
+1. Why not simply use explicit
On 02/10/2009 12:42, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2009/10/2 Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org:
No. The interpolation way has less nodes in it than houses. Thats the whole
point of having an interpolation way. Otherwise you'd just use those nodes
and tag them with the right house numbers and you are
On 28/09/2009, at 2:22 PM, Marcus Wolschon wrote:
25A-25C should work with addr:interpolation=alphabetic .
However not all software that supports interpolation at all,
supports this interpolation-mode yet.
25-25A would not.
I'm not sure you how you can interpolate things like this correctly
On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 18:51:35 +1000, James Livingston doc...@mac.com
wrote:
On 28/09/2009, at 2:22 PM, Marcus Wolschon wrote:
25A-25C should work with addr:interpolation=alphabetic .
However not all software that supports interpolation at all,
supports this interpolation-mode yet.
25-25A
On 30/09/2009 09:51, James Livingston wrote:
On 28/09/2009, at 2:22 PM, Marcus Wolschon wrote:
25A-25C should work with addr:interpolation=alphabetic .
However not all software that supports interpolation at all,
supports this interpolation-mode yet.
25-25A would not.
I'm not sure you how
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 8:59 PM, Mike N. nice...@att.net wrote:
Since I haven't heard any counter points of view, how do we proceed with
this? Based on previous comments, it should not just be Edit the wiki
page, or is this change small enough to just update the wiki?
If you're referring
On 28 Sep 2009, at 05:22, Marcus Wolschon mar...@wolschon.biz wrote:
On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 7:33 PM, David Earl da...@frankieandshadow.com
wrote:
I'm experimenting with adding house numbering for the first time (and
using the address interpolation plugin).
One common case I came across
What plugin are you talking about?
The AdvancedAddressDB of Traveling Salesman?
Sorry, the AddrInterpolation plugin in JOSM.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/AddrInterpolation
which doesn't allow you to put just a number in the starting # field
when numbering scheme is set to
On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 06:33:25PM +0100, David Earl wrote:
I'm experimenting with adding house numbering for the first time (and
using the address interpolation plugin).
One common case I came across was 25, 25A, 25B, ...
I wonder whether addr:interpolation=alphabetic could include this
I'm experimenting with adding house numbering for the first time (and
using the address interpolation plugin).
One common case I came across was 25, 25A, 25B, ...
I wonder whether addr:interpolation=alphabetic could include this case
(in essence when the first node has no letter, the second
On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 7:33 PM, David Earl da...@frankieandshadow.com wrote:
I'm experimenting with adding house numbering for the first time (and
using the address interpolation plugin).
One common case I came across was 25, 25A, 25B, ...
I wonder whether addr:interpolation=alphabetic
Thank you Brian for your tips, I edited address with suggestions you
made. Can I ask you just to check if I made it ok now, because I will
start adding street numbers so I would like to be sure I'm doing ti
correctly:
So I should remove:
addr:city = Osijek
addr:country = Croatia
addr:postcode = 31000
addr:street = Starigradska
from way and put it back on nodes?
Imo, yes, you should put all those details onto the objects that carry
addr:housenumber (either nodes or building outlines). That's the method
Imo, yes, you should put all those details onto the objects that carry
addr:housenumber (either nodes or building outlines). That's the method
intended by the documentation and I don't see a good reason for not
sticking to it in this case.
inconsistent duplication.
I can't image having to
Brian Quinion wrote:
Imo, yes, you should put all those details onto the objects that carry
addr:housenumber (either nodes or building outlines). That's the method
intended by the documentation and I don't see a good reason for not
sticking to it in this case.
inconsistent duplication.
I'd
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 10:57 PM, Valent Turkovic
valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 2:18 PM, Brian
Quinionopenstreet...@brian.quinion.co.uk wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 1:05 PM, Valent
Turkovicvalent.turko...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, I'm using address interpolation for
On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 01:18:33PM +0100, Brian Quinion wrote:
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 1:05 PM, Valent
Turkovicvalent.turko...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, I'm using address interpolation for the first time so I would like to
ask if somebody can check if I did it ok or if there are some errors:
I'd suggest moving all the following tags
addr:city = Osijek
addr:country = 385
addr:postcode = 31000
addr:street = Starigradska
to the way (rather than the individual nodes). And I'd suggest that
addr:country = 385 is unlikely to be understood.
No! Please don't do that. That makes
No! Please don't do that. That makes it harder to use. Then
there are two
possible ways, where data can be. Please use only
addr:interpolation on
the way and everything else on the nodes.
Which seems to be the opposite of what the section on the Karlsruhe
interpolation wiki section says:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/489432179
I'd suggest moving all the following tags
addr:city = Osijek
addr:country = 385
addr:postcode = 31000
addr:street = Starigradska
No! Please don't do that. That makes it harder to use. Then there are two
possible ways, where data can be.
On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 02:51:36PM +0100, Ed Loach wrote:
No! Please don't do that. That makes it harder to use. Then
there are two
possible ways, where data can be. Please use only
addr:interpolation on
the way and everything else on the nodes.
Which seems to be the opposite of what
that you can ignore tags on the way just doesn't work. Your advise
Do you have numbers for that?
There are, as of last Wednesday:
46899 uses with addr:street in this way I described
209340 uses with addr:street used to link a building outline to a street
2947067 uses with addr:street used to
Hi,
Brian Quinion wrote:
No, duplication is almost always bad (caching may be an exception).
Inconsistent data is the enemy of all good database management
*Inconsistent* data is surely not desirable, but *redundant* information
may well have its place because it makes it easier to spot
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 2:18 PM, Brian
Quinionopenstreet...@brian.quinion.co.uk wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 1:05 PM, Valent
Turkovicvalent.turko...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, I'm using address interpolation for the first time so I would like to
ask if somebody can check if I did it ok or if
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 7:28 AM, andrzej zaborowskibalr...@gmail.com wrote:
in this case I agree we should stick to the schema the way it was
originally defined, good or bad, and I normally only use addr:street
on the nodes.
+1
Another argument for doing that is that the addr:interpolation
Hi, I'm using address interpolation for the first time so I would like to
ask if somebody can check if I did it ok or if there are some errors:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=45.544703lon=18.718653zoom=18layers=B000FTF
Thank you in advance!
--
pratite me na twitteru -
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 1:05 PM, Valent
Turkovicvalent.turko...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, I'm using address interpolation for the first time so I would like to
ask if somebody can check if I did it ok or if there are some errors:
31 matches
Mail list logo
