Re: [OSM-talk] classification of airports/aerodromes

On 13/04/2016 8:35 AM, Alejandro S. wrote: But the surface tag applies to runaways, not aerodromes, does it? If the surface tag is on the runway .. then it applies to the runway, similarly for taxiway etc. Personally my experience is that it much easier to map the runway, as that is fairly

Re: [OSM-talk] classification of airports/aerodromes

But the surface tag applies to runaways, not aerodromes, does it? On Tue, Apr 12, 2016, 23:25 Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 13/04/2016 5:47 AM, Michael Kugelmann wrote: > > Am 12.04.2016 um 11:40 schrieb Christoph Hormann: > >> This is also a problem for map rendering - map styles

Re: [OSM-talk] classification of airports/aerodromes

On 13/04/2016 5:47 AM, Michael Kugelmann wrote: Am 12.04.2016 um 11:40 schrieb Christoph Hormann: This is also a problem for map rendering - map styles use these features to place labels and icons but these features are generally too ill-defined and undifferentiated to do this properly. I agree

[OSM-talk] classification of airports/aerodromes (was: Old Aerodromes)

Am 12.04.2016 um 11:40 schrieb Christoph Hormann: This is also a problem for map rendering - map styles use these features to place labels and icons but these features are generally too ill-defined and undifferentiated to do this properly. I agree completely. This is something that should be