Since all the streets of The Netherlands already made their way into
wikidata, I think it's reasonable to add other streets as well and indeed
it's possible/desirable to say in wikidata what was named after something
else.
Wikidata is not Wikipedia, which indeed suffers from the problem that what
On 31/07/15 17:47, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>> or you simply read the information in wikidata/wikipedia.
>
> given that even the street of the seven churches around here ("via delle
> sette chiese") doesn't have its own WP/Wikidata article yet (although
> referenced a lot, e.g. here:
> https:
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 05:31:48PM +0200, Ruben Maes wrote:
> 2015-07-31 17:21 GMT+02:00 Lester Caine :
> > On 31/07/15 16:09, Jo wrote:
> >> That's what is proposed here though:
> >> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Wikidata
> >>
> >> And it keeps that particular wikidata tag n
sent from a phone
> Am 31.07.2015 um 18:16 schrieb Lester Caine :
>
> or you simply read the information in wikidata/wikipedia.
given that even the street of the seven churches around here ("via delle sette
chiese") doesn't have its own WP/Wikidata article yet (although referenced a
lot, e.
On 31/07/15 16:35, Jo wrote:
> Due to the fact that our ids are not stable, the only reasonable way to
> add links between wikidata and OSM is to tag objects on our side. I
> spent some time convincing the people at wikidata about this over a year
> ago. I had thought it was obvious for OSM contrib
2015-07-31 17:31 GMT+02:00 Ruben Maes :
> I'd say make a reference to the actual object is named after, not just
> to 'church'.
Although this might not always be clear. There is a street called
Church Street near me and it has two churches. Which church is the
street named after? Some historical r
sent from a phone
> Am 31.07.2015 um 17:31 schrieb Ruben Maes :
>
> I'd say make a reference to the actual object is named after, not just
> to 'church'.
+1, if you then want all churches you can ask wikidata which of the tagged
specific instances are churches.
cheers
Martin
_
Due to the fact that our ids are not stable, the only reasonable way to add
links between wikidata and OSM is to tag objects on our side. I spent some
time convincing the people at wikidata about this over a year ago. I had
thought it was obvious for OSM contributors.
Polyglot
2015-07-31 17:21 GM
2015-07-31 17:21 GMT+02:00 Lester Caine :
> On 31/07/15 16:09, Jo wrote:
>> That's what is proposed here though:
>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Wikidata
>>
>> And it keeps that particular wikidata tag nicely together with the name
>> when sorted alphabetically.
>
> I don't
On 31/07/15 16:09, Jo wrote:
> That's what is proposed here though:
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Wikidata
>
> And it keeps that particular wikidata tag nicely together with the name
> when sorted alphabetically.
I don't see any point loading our servers down with wikidat
That's what is proposed here though:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Wikidata
And it keeps that particular wikidata tag nicely together with the name
when sorted alphabetically.
Jo
2015-07-31 17:01 GMT+02:00 Jochen Topf :
> On Fr, Jul 31, 2015 at 04:27:05 +0200, Jo wrote:
>
On Fr, Jul 31, 2015 at 04:27:05 +0200, Jo wrote:
> I like to create bridges between projects, so now I was looking into the
> name:etymology:wikidata tag.
Whatever you do, do not use an abomination like "name:etymology:wikidata",
because to a computer it looks like it is a "name"-Tag with the lang
Hi,
I like to create bridges between projects, so now I was looking into the
name:etymology:wikidata tag.
And I have a question about it.
Say, you have a
Rue de la Chapelle
Rue de la Station
I'd be inclined to make it point to the specific instance of chapel or
station. The other possibility wo
13 matches
Mail list logo
